Lecture 9 - Behaviorist and Cognitive Theories on Personality
Linear Model of Behavioral Outcomes
A linear model is presented as: Y = B0 + B1X1 + B2X_2 + … +error
Implications on Freedom:
Behaviour is only factors times the extent of influence, human freedom & thoughts are not accounted
Key Features of Behaviorism
Mechanistic View of Individuals:
People are seen as collections of machine-like mechanisms.
Environmental Determinism:
Behavior is determined by the environment, rather than through autonomous actions.
Critique of Internal Traits:
Latent traits and inner states are seen as non-constructive.
Universal Mechanisms:
These mechanisms are also evident in animals, suggesting a continuity between human and animal behavior.
Psychotherapeutic Approach:
Psychotherapy is viewed as reestablishing healthy environment-behavior contingencies.
John B. Watson and Conditioning Emotions
Research Focus:
Investigated whether innate emotions like fear can be conditioned through novel stimuli.
Example provided: The case of "Little Albert," highlighting fear conditioned by various stimuli.
Quotes from Watson:
“At approximately nine months of age we ran him (Albert) through the emotional tests that have become a part of our regular routine in determining whether fear reactions can be called out by other stimuli than sharp noises and the sudden removal of support.”
Watson contends that fear is as primal and influential as love in shaping personality.
Learning Generalization:
Learning can generalize to other targets, as demonstrated in the study with "Little Albert."
Ivan Pavlov’s Experiments on Conditioned Responses
Conditioning and Discrimination:
Example: Pavlov's drooling dogs where stress response and behavior were observed akin to human neurosis.
- Conditioned stimulus leads to drooling that is reinforced, while distractor stimuli does not reinforce drooling.
Pavlov’s Observations (1927):
Observed that dogs displayed distress when conditioned discrimination failed; the behavior manifested signs of neurosis, indicating a severe psychological response.
B.F. Skinner’s Behavioral Modification
Radical Behaviorism:
Skinner conducted laboratory studies focusing on modifying animal behavior through external environment control (e.g., Skinner Box).
Emphasizes reinforcement (rather than punishment) as a universal mechanism of personality development.
Believes that maladaptive behaviour is only due to ineffective learning
Experimental Observations:
Discussed findings on pigeons fed on random schedules and their resulting ritualistic behaviors; e.g., the bird behaves as if there were a causal relation between its behaviour and food
Behavioral Analogies:
Skinner relates the behavior of pigeons to human rituals that maintain regardless of negative reinforcement.
Example: Bowlers maintaining body movements to control the ball despite lack of correlation.
Skinner on Inner States and Personality Psychology
Critique of Prescientific Views:
thinks that problem of circularity exists if we say human behaviour is due to inner states
Arguments Against Inner States:
Skinner argues that referencing human behavior to inner states leads to circular reasoning and is not scientifically constructive.
Are we autonomous and free? We think so only because we haven’t looked at the environmental factors causing the behaviour
Little Hans and Oedipal Complex
Freud’s Analysis of Little Hans:
Analysis included the concepts of an Oedipal conflict and the role of castration anxiety.
Skinner proposed that Hans’s fear of horses could stem from negative stimuli or punishments rather than being a product of complex emotional states.
Temperature and Social Behavior
Social Thermoregulation Theory:
Higher temperatures can lead to perceived social warmth increases and a higher tendency to help others.
General Aggression Model:
Higher temperatures can invoke hostile thoughts, leading to less helping behavior.
Social Activity Theory:
Elevated temperature can increase activity levels, causing more opportunities for both helping behavior and crime.
Skinner on Freedom and Control
believes that human beings do not have freedom, actions all caused by environmental input
Literature on Freedom:
we always forget the environmental input (eg. people success in aversive environments- maybe sth in the environment has helped? bad behaviour- caused by environment???)
Skinner’s Utopia concept
Discusses the idea that individuals cannot escape control, aversive control (negative reinforcement) create slaves, benevolent control (positive reinforcement) make us feel free
Proposes a fictional society in "Walden Two" where societal roles are predicated on non-competitive collaboration without admiration or punishment.
4 hour work per day→ happy slaves
Social Organization: unpleasant work more credit, pleasant work less credit
Emotional Education: Desensitization from unprductive emotions like jealousy and pride
Debate on Behavioral Control
Skinner (1956) Stance:
All individuals control and are controlled, presenting a necessity to negotiate the type and purpose of control exercised.
Rogers's Critique:
Posits that true behavioral control should enable self-actualization rather than creating happy slaves
individuals should decidehow they should live their lives: as they know best
Client-centered therapy helps clients to gain back internal control, so it contradicts with Skinner’s thinking
Skinnerian and Rogerian Utopias
Views on Self-Actualization and Productivity
Skinner's Response:
The overarching goal of behavioral control according to Skinner:
To ensure cultural survival, rather than simply achieving happiness or productivity.
Renouncing “useful control” (as seen by Skinner in Rogers's proposal) leaves the population vulnerable to unhealthy forms of control.
Implicit statement: Control is an inescapable aspect of human life.
George A. Kelly’s Theory of Personal Constructs
Emphasis on people as thinking beings, countering Skinner's views.
People have alternate ways to construe the environment.
People Evaluate Constructs based on predictive accuracy and they refine their constructs for higher precision.
Constructive Alternativism
all construct systems are our predictions/contain our subjective views
Flexibility in Constructs:
no construction is inherently superior to another.
Each construct has its specific range and foci of conveneience (context within which it is useful)
Theory Preference:
Having any construct theory is preferred over having none.
Foci of convenience of different theories
Learning Theory: Focus on animal learning and environmental contingencies.
Humanistic Theory: Emphasis on self-experience.
Psychoanalysis: Focus on psychodynamics in neurosis.
Five-Factor Model: Common taxonomy for personality traits.
Limitations of theories:
Theoretical frameworks become less useful when applied beyond their respective ranges of convenience.
Fundamental Problems in Psychological Theories
Explanation of Human Processes:
Concept: Human processes viewed as results of energy interactions; similar to external forces acting on physical items.
Inference: Humans are described as inert beings influenced by external stimuli or internal motivations.
The Problem of Animism
Critique of Energy Theories:
criticizes theories that reduce human actions solely to external energy → minimizing individual agency, effectively portraying humans as passive recipients of stimuli rather than active agents.
Intrinsic motivations:
Self-actualization suggested as an innate drive for social connectivity.
Kelly's Perspective on Phenomenal Field
Classical theories' failure to engage the full complexity of human nature:
Abandonment of the “phenomenal field” neglects the richness of human experience.
Call to focus on analyzing individuals as active agents rather than as inert objects
Kelly's assertion:
“It’s time to give life back to the person who lives it.”
Fundamental Problems in Theoretical Design
Individuality in Theory Design:
Contrasts between nomothetic (group-focused) and idiographic (individual-focused) approaches; not contradictory but rather complementary.
Freedom vs. Determinism:
Kelly's assertion: Individuals possess both freedom and determinism based on the perspective taken.
Kelly’s Fundamental Postulate
Definition of processes:
“A person’s processes are psychologically channelized by the ways in which he anticipates events.”
Human Agency:
Clarification that individuals are active participants in their processes.
Variation arises from differing interpretations of experiences.
Individuals can exercise their freedom in how they channel these processes.
Past experiences inform but do not restrict future anticipations; forward-looking focus emphasizes predictive capabilities.
Construct Dichotomy
Importance of dichotomy in constructs:
Constructs only hold significance if they reflect contrasting poles.
Example constructs: “This is good” implies a negation of something not good.
Coexistence of Contrasts:
Opposite poles (e.g., freedom vs. non-freedom) exist simultaneously yet remain uncontradictory.
Demonstration of Constructs:
Utilization of comparisons among three objects to showcase similarity and contrast.
Range of Convenience
Categorization of Related Objects:
Contextual illustration where specific objects are construed within defined criteria, such as furniture classification.
Examples given: Table, Desk vs. Chair.
Range of Convenience Definition:
The set of constructs relevant for categorizing contexts; others may exist, but they remain extraneous to the construct's efficacy.
Implications of Dichotomous Nature of Constructs
Construct Necessity:
A lack of dichotomy limits a construct's constructive potential; thus, maintaining distinct contrasts is crucial.
Challenges in Clarity:
Individuals may struggle identifying contrast poles due to pre-verbal constructs or blocks in understanding akin to Freud's repression.
Illustrative case: A person perceiving all aspects of the world positively lacks an identifiable negative contrast.
Individuality, Freedom, and Determinism
The Role of Constructs in Action:
Constructs define individual actions; diverse constructs lead to varied behaviors even among shared constructs.
Organization of constructs influences perception and decision-making.
Case Study and Repertory Grid Analysis
Personal Construction of Important Figures:
Mildred Beal serves as a case example, showcasing the individual's unique construct system as revealed through a repertory grid.
Case study of Mildred Beal
Excessive use of repetitive, simplistic constructs indicative of ineffective construction of social identities.
Key contrasts identified: hypersensitive vs. relaxed, hypercritical vs. easygoing.
The core construct: Unhappy striving contrasted with comfortable quiescence.
Counselor Interactions and Construct Shifts
Insights from Beal’s Interaction:
Limited vocabulary and rigidity in conversations noted.
Notable resistance to suggestions but tendency toward rationalization. (defence mechanisms)
Potential for transference observed, drawing parallels to maternal or sibling relationships.
Marrying Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches
Consideration of Personality Assessments:
Can the nomothetic approach thoroughly encapsulate an individual's constructs?
Big Five + Repertory Grid: the personal contructs can be explained mostly by FFM, but it cannot capture the construction system completely.
Construct Complexity vs. Simplicity
Simple construction system→ applied beyond range of convenience→ low predictability
More complex construction→ high cognitive complexity, also higher predictive power
A highly differentiated construct system enhances predictive power while a less varied system restricts it.
Distinction between High and Low Complexity Individuals
High-complex individuals incorporate inconsistent information to form impressions, while low-complex individuals reject incongruent data maintaining consistency.
Complexity correlates positively with the openness dimension in the FFM framework.
Person-as-Scientist Approach
Construct Failure in Explanation: (need to accommodate new experiences, not as predicted)
Conceptualizing anxiety, fear, and threat concerning construct applicability.
Mechanisms to expand or rationalize construct systems vary in efficacy (good vs. bad scientists).
Clinical Applications of Personal Construction Theory
Role of Constructs:
Constructs(how we see things/phenomenological field) lead to actions; individuals must have the freedom to adjust for better outcomes.
Kelly’s Fixed-Role Therapy:
Clients assume new roles to facilitate new constructs, aided by fixed-role sketches for transformation.
Through new experiences, clients reconstruct self-concepts to enhance predictive effectiveness.
Repertory Test and Confrontation of Constructs
Purpose of Repertory Test:
Confronts clients with the rigidity of their constructs, prompting reflection.
Illustrative dialogues expose limited perceptions: “Isn’t that a narrow view?” or recognizing dehumanization of significant figures.
Therapist's Role in Fixed-Role Therapy
Dynamic of Therapy:
Therapists help shift client construct systems by creating urgency for change and challenging clients' defenses.
Techniques include suggesting alternative perspectives and leveraging past experiences within new contexts.
Concluding Remarks on Theories and Constructs
Skinner’s Perspective:
Seen as reducing people to mere subjects lacking autonomy, yet upholding freedom as an experimenter.
Rogers's Contrasting View:
Advocated for “good control” that facilitates potential actualization rather than mechanical productivity.
Kelly's Conclusion:
Abandonment of energy theories to focus on the nuanced nature of the phenomenal field in understanding human behavior.
The intersection of freedom and determinism viewed as inherently connected.