Untitled

COGNITIVE END OF YEAR REVIEW

C1: Models of Memory

  • Explain two models or theories of one cognitive process with reference to research studies.
Introduction
  • Discuss the cognitive process of memory.
  • Define the two main memory models:
      - Multi-Store Model (MSM): proposes that memory consists of three stores: sensory memory, short-term memory (STM), and long-term memory (LTM).
      - Working Memory Model (WMM): focuses on the structure of short-term memory, consisting of a central executive and multiple subsystems.
  • Note the two models to be supported with studies: MSM and WMM.
Studies that Apply
  • Atkinson & Shiffrin: introduced the Multi-Store Model (3-Box memory model).
  • Glazner & Cunitz: demonstrated that STM and LTM memories are stored in different parts of the brain through studies of recall and interference.
  • Corkin and Milner: provided evidence through case study of patient HM, supporting the idea that STM and LTM are distinct.
  • Baddeley & Hitch: created the Working Memory Model which includes:
      - Central Executive: directs attention and processing.
      - Phonological Loop: auditory information storage and rehearsal.
      - Visuospatial Sketch Pad: visual and spatial information processing.
  • Laundry and Bartling: supported the WMM by examining how distractions affect recall.

C2: Schema Theory

  • Outline schema theory with reference to research studies.
Introduction
  • Bartlett: introduced schema theory, suggesting that knowledge and memories are organized in mental structures called schemas.
  • Different types of schemas:
      - Scripts: expectations for routine activities.
      - Self-Schemas: beliefs and ideas about oneself.
      - Social Schemas: generalizations about groups and social norms.
Studies that Apply
  • Bartlett: used the ghost story study to demonstrate how schemas affect memory recall.
  • Brewer & Treyens: conducted the office study showing how expectations influenced memory of an office environment.
  • Bransford & Johnson: illustrated how context and schema activation can aid memory retention (laundry study).

C3: Thinking and Decision-Making

  • Explain thinking and decision-making with studies that support these processes.
Introduction
  • Define thinking as the cognitive process of manipulating information.
  • Define decision-making (DM) as the process of selecting a choice from alternatives.
  • Define Heuristics: mental shortcuts used in decision-making:
      - Availability Heuristic: judging the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind.
      - System 1: intuitive, fast, and emotional processing.
      - System 2: rational, slower, and more deliberate thinking.
Studies that Fit
  • Kahneman & Tversky: illustrated System 1 thinking through various cognitive biases.
  • Englich & Mussweiler: examined System 2 thinking in the context of legal judgments.
  • Kahneman & Tversky: further explored decision-making biases in their 2000 study.

C4: Reliability of Cognitive Processes

  • Explain the reliability of one cognitive process pertaining to bias/influences on thinking and decision-making.
Introduction
  • Explain how cognitive shortcuts lead to bias in confirming pre-existing beliefs.
  • List factors involved in biased thinking:
      - Personal experiences, cultural influences, and cognitive biases.
  • Define framing bias: the way information is presented affects decisions.
  • Define anchoring bias: reliance on the first piece of information encountered when making decisions.
Studies that Fit
  • Kahneman & Tversky (1974): demonstrated anchoring bias using numerical estimations.
  • Kahneman & Tversky (1986): showed framing effects in decision-making regarding gains and losses.
  • Englich & Mussweiler: provided evidence for anchoring effects in legal settings.

C5: Reliability of Memory as a Cognitive Process

  • With reference to relevant research studies, explain how one cognitive process is reliable.
Introduction
  • Explain the cognitive process of memory.
  • Discuss Eyewitness Testimony (EWT) and its connection to memory reliability.
  • Explain Reconstructive Memory: the idea that memories are not static but reconstructed, often leading to inaccuracies.
  • State how reconstructive nature can make memory unreliable.
Studies that Apply
  • Loftus & Palmer: explored the effects of leading questions on EWT.
  • Bartlett: contributed to understanding constructive memory through his schema theory studies.
  • Brewer & Treyens: examined how context affects memory reconstruction.
  • Neisser & Harsch: studied EWT, showing inaccuracies in memories of high-emotion events.
  • Brown & Kulik: investigated flashbulb memories and their reliability over time.

C6: Interaction of Cognitive and Biological Factors in Emotion

  • Describe how cognitive and biological factors interact in emotion.
Introduction
  • Ekman et al. (1972): identified six fundamental emotions consistent across cultures:
      - Fear
      - Anger
      - Surprise
      - Sadness
      - Happiness
      - Disgust
Introduction to Cognition and Emotion
  • Define Cognition: the mental processes of acquiring, processing knowledge through thought, experiences, and senses.
  • Theories of Emotion:
      - Lazarus' Appraisal Theory: evaluates emotional responses as either positive or negative, influenced by cognitive appraisal through mechanisms in the hippocampus and amygdala.
      - Brown & Kulik’s Flashbulb Memory Theory: describes how emotionally significant events create vivid, sometimes inaccurate memories, involving the amygdala.
Flashbulb Memory (FBM)
  • Define Flashbulb Memory: a type of emotional memory characterized by vivid and detailed recollections of highly emotional events, akin to a memory captured by a camera flash.
  • Explain FBM:
      - Brown & Kulik (1977): posited that FBM is elicited by unexpected, important emotional events, thereby distinguished from ordinary memories, which are often selective, unreliable, and malleable.
  • Unique features of FBM include greater vividness, accuracy, consistency, and longevity compared to regular memories.
Studies that Apply
  • Speisman: examined cognitive appraisal affecting emotional experiences.
  • Brown & Kulik: contributed fundamental evidence for FBM theory.
  • Neisser & Harsch: investigated the reliability of FBMs over time, noting common inaccuracies.

C7: Research Methods in the Cognitive Level of Analysis (CLOA)

  • Explain how and why particular research methods are used at the CLOA.
Introduction
  • List the research methods used:
      1. Experiment: controlled environment to test specific hypotheses.
      2. Correlation: measures relationships between variables.
      3. Longitudinal: studies the same participants over time for developmental insights.
      4. Survey/Interview: gathers qualitative data from subjects.
      5. Case Study: in-depth investigation of an individual or group.
Explanation of Methods
  • Discuss specific applications of each method:
      1. Experiment: Used by Baddeley, Loftus & Palmer, Kahneman & Tversky, and Glazner & Cunitz.
      2. Longitudinal: Focuses on studies like HM to observe cognitive changes over time.
      3. Survey/Interview: Essential in studies like Brown & Kulik, Neisser & Harsch.
      4. Case Study: Used to provide detailed insights regarding individuals like HM.

C8: Ethical Considerations in Research Methods at CLOA

  • Discuss ethical considerations related to research methods used at the CLOA.
Introduction
  • Ethical considerations include:
      - P: Prevention of physical or mental harm may not be guaranteed.
      - I: Importance of informed consent.
      - C: Ensuring confidentiality of participant data.
      - W: Right to withdraw from the study at any time.
      - D: Importance of debriefing participants after the study.
      - D: Necessity to avoid deception, or at least manage it ethically.
Studies that Apply
  • Loftus & Pickrell: studied false memories with ethical concerns regarding consent and deception.
  • Brown & Kulik: examined emotional pain associated with recalling memories, raising ethical implications in health.
  • HM: ethical issues related to informed consent, deceptive practices, and the inability to withdraw or debrief.
  • Englich & Mussweiler: raised concerns about deception in the legal context.
  • Speisman: focused on the potential for psychological harm through stress in an experimental context.
  • Brewer & Treyens: dealt with deception in reporting memory recall.
  • Loftus and Palmer (Car Crash): evaluation of deception regarding the nature of the experiment and potential impact on participant consent.