Transfer Pricing
Transfer Pricing Overview
Learning Objective: Determine the range within which a negotiated transfer price should fall and explain approaches to setting the transfer price.
Definition of Transfer Price: The price charged when one division of a company sells goods or services to another division of the same company.
Importance: Transfer prices can significantly impact the profits reported by both the buying and selling segments, thereby affecting managerial assessments and operational decision-making.
Transfer Pricing Scenario Example
Industry Context: Common in industries like oil (e.g., Imperial, Shell, Petro-Canada) where divisions process products and sell through retail outlets.
Performance Measures: Divisions evaluated using metrics like Return on Investment (ROI) or Residual Income.
Example:
Petrol-refining division sells gasoline at a transfer price (e.g., $1.00 per litre) to the retail division.
Refining division credits $1.00 revenue while the retailing division records it as an expense.
Transfer pricing impacts internal profit evaluation without affecting consolidated company profits.
Approaches to Setting Transfer Prices
Negotiated Transfer Prices:
Agreement on price between managing divisions.
Advantages:
Preserves autonomy of divisions.
Managers possess better information regarding costs and benefits.
Limitations: Difficulties predicting exact price; both divisions need to see profit improvements.
Cost-Based Transfer Prices:
Set at variable cost or full absorption cost.
Drawbacks:
Can lead to risky decisions; selling division may show no profit from internal transfer.
Little incentive for cost control as costs are passed on.
Example Issue: Full cost might be above outside supplier price, inhibiting internal transfers.
Market-Based Transfer Prices:
Set based on competitive market prices for transferred products.
Advantages:
Aligns internal pricing with external markets when idle capacity exists.
Challenges:
Might create perception issues for managers if costs are represented inaccurately.
Division Perspectives in Transfer Pricing
Selling Division's Perspective
Lowest Acceptable Transfer Price: Must cover variable costs and potential lost sales—e.g., for Cumberland Beverages, minimum must be $8 plus opportunity costs.
Purchasing Division's Perspective
Highest Acceptable Transfer Price: Typically based on the cost of external suppliers; e.g., Pizza Place may not pay more than outside vendor prices.
Range of Acceptable Transfer Prices
Range Consideration: The agreed price should lie between selling division’s minimum and purchasing division’s maximum. Managers must reach a cooperative agreement to benefit both divisions.
Situational Examples of Transfer Pricing Dynamics
Case 1: Selling Division with Idle Capacity
Division selling less than its capacity—e.g., 7,000 kegs with 3,000 idle.
Agreed Transfer Price Range:
Minimum = $8 (selling division costs)
Maximum = $18 (purchasing division finding external costs).
Their agreement could effectively be anywhere from $8 to $18.
Case 2: Selling Division with No Idle Capacity
Division fully utilizing resources—e.g., selling 10,000 kegs at $20, needs to divert to internal.
Impasse: Selling division insists on at least $20 transfer price, while purchasing division can only pay up to $18.
Conclusion: No transfer—it’s counterproductive for the overall company to facilitate this.
Case 3: Division with Some Idle Capacity
Division has limited capacity to satisfy an internal order; needs to calculate due to lost sales.
Agreed Transfer Price: Must incorporate lost sale opportunity costs leading to a mutually agreeable price.
Evaluation of Transfer Pricing Mechanisms
Negotiate Principle: Internal transfer pricing can indirectly harm divisions if they misalign or both work at odds with top management objectives.
International Implications: Involve minimizing taxes, duties affecting price strategies based on jurisdictional regulations and competitive positioning.
Emphasis on compliance with legal requirements such as arm's length pricing to ensure fair assessment of tax obligations.
Conclusion
Decentralization Principle: Allow managers autonomy for decisions while balancing profitability and cooperative agreements across divisions.
Recognition of Best Interests: If transfers increase profits, there exists a collaborative solution for fair pricing and enhancing overall organizational efficiency.