Transfer Pricing

Transfer Pricing Overview

  • Learning Objective: Determine the range within which a negotiated transfer price should fall and explain approaches to setting the transfer price.

  • Definition of Transfer Price: The price charged when one division of a company sells goods or services to another division of the same company.

  • Importance: Transfer prices can significantly impact the profits reported by both the buying and selling segments, thereby affecting managerial assessments and operational decision-making.

Transfer Pricing Scenario Example

  • Industry Context: Common in industries like oil (e.g., Imperial, Shell, Petro-Canada) where divisions process products and sell through retail outlets.

  • Performance Measures: Divisions evaluated using metrics like Return on Investment (ROI) or Residual Income.

  • Example:

    • Petrol-refining division sells gasoline at a transfer price (e.g., $1.00 per litre) to the retail division.

    • Refining division credits $1.00 revenue while the retailing division records it as an expense.

    • Transfer pricing impacts internal profit evaluation without affecting consolidated company profits.

Approaches to Setting Transfer Prices

  • Negotiated Transfer Prices:

    • Agreement on price between managing divisions.

    • Advantages:

      • Preserves autonomy of divisions.

      • Managers possess better information regarding costs and benefits.

    • Limitations: Difficulties predicting exact price; both divisions need to see profit improvements.

  • Cost-Based Transfer Prices:

    • Set at variable cost or full absorption cost.

    • Drawbacks:

      • Can lead to risky decisions; selling division may show no profit from internal transfer.

      • Little incentive for cost control as costs are passed on.

    • Example Issue: Full cost might be above outside supplier price, inhibiting internal transfers.

  • Market-Based Transfer Prices:

    • Set based on competitive market prices for transferred products.

    • Advantages:

      • Aligns internal pricing with external markets when idle capacity exists.

    • Challenges:

      • Might create perception issues for managers if costs are represented inaccurately.

Division Perspectives in Transfer Pricing

Selling Division's Perspective

  • Lowest Acceptable Transfer Price: Must cover variable costs and potential lost sales—e.g., for Cumberland Beverages, minimum must be $8 plus opportunity costs.

Purchasing Division's Perspective

  • Highest Acceptable Transfer Price: Typically based on the cost of external suppliers; e.g., Pizza Place may not pay more than outside vendor prices.

Range of Acceptable Transfer Prices

  • Range Consideration: The agreed price should lie between selling division’s minimum and purchasing division’s maximum. Managers must reach a cooperative agreement to benefit both divisions.

Situational Examples of Transfer Pricing Dynamics

Case 1: Selling Division with Idle Capacity

  • Division selling less than its capacity—e.g., 7,000 kegs with 3,000 idle.

  • Agreed Transfer Price Range:

    • Minimum = $8 (selling division costs)

    • Maximum = $18 (purchasing division finding external costs).

    • Their agreement could effectively be anywhere from $8 to $18.

Case 2: Selling Division with No Idle Capacity

  • Division fully utilizing resources—e.g., selling 10,000 kegs at $20, needs to divert to internal.

  • Impasse: Selling division insists on at least $20 transfer price, while purchasing division can only pay up to $18.

  • Conclusion: No transfer—it’s counterproductive for the overall company to facilitate this.

Case 3: Division with Some Idle Capacity

  • Division has limited capacity to satisfy an internal order; needs to calculate due to lost sales.

  • Agreed Transfer Price: Must incorporate lost sale opportunity costs leading to a mutually agreeable price.

Evaluation of Transfer Pricing Mechanisms

  • Negotiate Principle: Internal transfer pricing can indirectly harm divisions if they misalign or both work at odds with top management objectives.

  • International Implications: Involve minimizing taxes, duties affecting price strategies based on jurisdictional regulations and competitive positioning.

  • Emphasis on compliance with legal requirements such as arm's length pricing to ensure fair assessment of tax obligations.

Conclusion

  • Decentralization Principle: Allow managers autonomy for decisions while balancing profitability and cooperative agreements across divisions.

  • Recognition of Best Interests: If transfers increase profits, there exists a collaborative solution for fair pricing and enhancing overall organizational efficiency.