Note
0.0(0)
SG

Critical Thinking: Arguments and Reasoning

What is Critical Thinking?

  • Fundamentally, critical thinking is about ensuring you have good reasons for your beliefs.

  • It involves distinguishing between good and bad reasons for believing something.

  • A good reason is one that makes a belief probable or likely to be true; the best reasons guarantee the belief.

  • The term "good" here relates to truth, not morality.

  • Critical thinking is important because rational people want their beliefs to be true and avoid false beliefs.

What is an Argument?

  • An argument is a set of statements (premises) that together provide a reason for a further statement (conclusion).

  • Premises: The statements that offer the reason.

  • Conclusion: The statement that the premises support.

  • A good argument has premises that make the conclusion likely to be true; i.e., the premises support the conclusion.

  • Critical thinking involves evaluating arguments to determine if their premises support their conclusions.

  • Example 1:

    • Premise 1: "I can't stand Monty."

    • Premise 2: "I want to have a good time."

    • Conclusion: "Monty won't be at the party."

    • Evaluation: Bad argument because the premises don’t make the conclusion more likely.

  • Example 2:

    • Premise 1: "Monty's in Beijing."

    • Premise 2: "He can't get from Beijing to the party in time."

    • Conclusion: "Monty won't be at the party."

    • Evaluation: Good argument because the premises guarantee the conclusion if they are true.

  • Bad arguments can sometimes be improved with additional background premises.

Deductive vs. Ampliative Arguments

  • Deductive Argument: An argument where the premises guarantee the truth of the conclusion.

    • If the premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

    • Example:

      • Premise 1: "Monty's in Beijing."

      • Premise 2: "He can't get from Beijing to the party in time."

      • Conclusion: "Monty won't be at the party."

  • Ampliative Argument: An argument where the premises make the conclusion probable but do not guarantee it.

    • The conclusion could be false even if the premises are true.

    • Example:

      • Premise 1: "Monty's really shy."

      • Premise 2: "He rarely goes to parties."

      • Conclusion: "Monty won't be at the party."

  • Evaluating Arguments:

    • It is important to know whether an argument is deductive or ampliative when evaluating it.

    • If a deductive argument fails to guarantee the conclusion, it can be rejected.

    • For ampliative arguments, the premises do not need to guarantee the conclusion; they only need to make it probable.

Summary

  • Critical thinking is about having good reasons for our beliefs, where a good reason makes the belief probable.

  • An argument consists of premises that provide a reason for a conclusion.

  • In a good argument, the premises support the conclusion.

  • A deductive argument guarantees the conclusion if the premises are true, while an ampliative argument makes the conclusion probable but does not guarantee it.

Note
0.0(0)