Lect 5 Fate and Bioaccumulation - ENSC
Page 1: Course Introduction
Course Title: ENSC 201: Environmental Toxicology and Chemical Risks
Lecture Title: Fate and Bioaccumulation
Instructor: Louise M. Winn, Ph.D.
Contact: Botterell Hall RM 557, winnl@queensu.ca
Page 2: Fate of Substances in the Environment
Environmental Compartments: Various ecosystems including:
Saltmarsh
Floodplain
Mangroves
Intertidal mudflat
Marine
Freshwater
Estuarine
Subtidal sand and mud
Toxicant Sources:
Pesticides and heavy metals from:
Mining
Agriculture
Urban land uses
Industrial point sources
Boating activities (e.g., antifoulants)
Transport Mechanisms:
Toxicants may be transported:
Attached to sediments
Dissolved in water.
Resuspension: Natural or anthropogenic processes can make toxicants available again.
Effects on Biota:
Pesticide settlement affects photosynthesis and plant health in various habitats.
Page 3: Transfer of Substances
Environmental Compartments: Toxicants can transfer between air, soil, water, and sediment over time.
Individual Behaviors: Molecules can behave differently in mixtures.
Transformations: Chemical and biological changes occur during transfer.
Page 4: Toxicant Lifetime and Persistence
Lifetime: Average duration of a toxicant in a compartment (Residency Time).
Persistence: Tendency of toxicants to remain in a compartment.
Longer lifetime equates to higher persistence.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): Organic toxicants with a lifetime greater than one year.
Page 5: Impact of Persistence
Importance of Persistence: The persistence of a toxicant directly influences its travel distance in the environment.
Page 6: Bioaccumulation
Definition: The accumulation of toxicants in the biological organism compartment over time.
Food Web Influence: Bioaccumulation correlates with persistent levels in organism tissues.
Chemical Properties: Dependence on the chemical properties of the toxicant.
Components of Bioaccumulation:
Bioconcentration: Partitioning of toxicants into organisms.
Biomagnification: Concentration increase through the food web.
Page 7: Principles of Bioconcentration
Bioconcentration: Refers to partitioning of toxicants into biological organisms.
Equilibrium between water and organisms.
Hydrophobicity: The relationship of toxicant's partitioning to its hydrophobic nature.
Partition Coefficient (Kow): Models bioconcentration using a chemical partition constant.
Page 8: Example of DDT
Data on DDT:
Water concentration: 0.003 ppm
Octanol concentration: 24,000 ppm
Kow calculation: Kow = 24,000/0.003 = 8.0 x 10^6
Logarithmic Scale: Log Kow = 6.9 indicates lipophilicity.
Page 9: Table of PAHs
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Variations in toxicant properties:
Log KOW, solubility, vapor pressure, half-life, and sorption coefficients listed for 16 PAHs.
Page 10: Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)
Measurement: BCF measured in laboratory settings:
Single toxicant exposure in controlled conditions.
Importance: Relates to hydrophobicity (Kow) and concentration in tissues versus water.
Page 11: BCF in Fish
Experiment Methodology: Fish placed in contaminated water (gill exposure only).
No food, levels measured at steady-state to establish BCF.
Page 12: Correlations with Log Kow
Graph Relation: Log BCF shows strong correlation with log Kow across toxicant series:
Higher log Kow often correlates with higher BCF.
Page 13: Limitations of BCF
Complex Realities: Laboratory conditions differ from natural water phases
Presence of dissolved organic carbon and particulates complicates measurements.
Key Reminders: Bioaccumulation incorporates both bioconcentration and biomagnification effects.
Page 14: Biomagnification
Definition: Concentration increases in predators through consumption of contaminated prey.
Assumes nearly all contaminants from prey are retained by predators.
Example Calculation: A 1 kg fish consumes smaller fish and accumulates significant DDT over time.
Page 15: Definitions
BCF: Laboratory experiment considering direct water exposure.
BAF: Includes all uptake routes, emphasizing comprehensive accumulation processes.
Page 16: Case Study - Clear Lake DDD
Historical Context: Use of DDD at Clear Lake, California to control pests, leading to significant ecological impact.
Notable deaths in Western Grebe, the need for investigation arose after continued usage.
Page 17: Continued Impacts
Analysis Findings: High levels of DDD in fish and grebe tissue noted after pesticide application, highlighting historical bioaccumulation issues.
Page 18: DDT Bioaccumulation
Trophic Effects: DDT concentration increases noted with higher trophic levels in the food chain, especially for humans through dietary intake.
Page 19: Bioaccumulation of PCBs
PCBs: Persistent, hydrophobic compounds; water and sediment persistence studied, highlighting extended biological effects in Great Lakes.
Page 20: Summary
Understanding Relationships: Bioaccumulation and chemical properties are crucial for risk assessments of new contaminants.
Persistence vs. Toxicity: Greater persistence may lead to unexpected toxicity in low concentrations, even when inherent toxicity is low.