Lect 5 Fate and Bioaccumulation - ENSC

Page 1: Course Introduction

  • Course Title: ENSC 201: Environmental Toxicology and Chemical Risks

  • Lecture Title: Fate and Bioaccumulation

  • Instructor: Louise M. Winn, Ph.D.

  • Contact: Botterell Hall RM 557, winnl@queensu.ca

Page 2: Fate of Substances in the Environment

  • Environmental Compartments: Various ecosystems including:

    • Saltmarsh

    • Floodplain

    • Mangroves

    • Intertidal mudflat

    • Marine

    • Freshwater

    • Estuarine

    • Subtidal sand and mud

  • Toxicant Sources:

    • Pesticides and heavy metals from:

      • Mining

      • Agriculture

      • Urban land uses

      • Industrial point sources

      • Boating activities (e.g., antifoulants)

  • Transport Mechanisms:

    • Toxicants may be transported:

      • Attached to sediments

      • Dissolved in water.

    • Resuspension: Natural or anthropogenic processes can make toxicants available again.

  • Effects on Biota:

    • Pesticide settlement affects photosynthesis and plant health in various habitats.

Page 3: Transfer of Substances

  • Environmental Compartments: Toxicants can transfer between air, soil, water, and sediment over time.

  • Individual Behaviors: Molecules can behave differently in mixtures.

  • Transformations: Chemical and biological changes occur during transfer.

Page 4: Toxicant Lifetime and Persistence

  • Lifetime: Average duration of a toxicant in a compartment (Residency Time).

  • Persistence: Tendency of toxicants to remain in a compartment.

    • Longer lifetime equates to higher persistence.

  • Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): Organic toxicants with a lifetime greater than one year.

Page 5: Impact of Persistence

  • Importance of Persistence: The persistence of a toxicant directly influences its travel distance in the environment.

Page 6: Bioaccumulation

  • Definition: The accumulation of toxicants in the biological organism compartment over time.

  • Food Web Influence: Bioaccumulation correlates with persistent levels in organism tissues.

  • Chemical Properties: Dependence on the chemical properties of the toxicant.

  • Components of Bioaccumulation:

    • Bioconcentration: Partitioning of toxicants into organisms.

    • Biomagnification: Concentration increase through the food web.

Page 7: Principles of Bioconcentration

  • Bioconcentration: Refers to partitioning of toxicants into biological organisms.

    • Equilibrium between water and organisms.

  • Hydrophobicity: The relationship of toxicant's partitioning to its hydrophobic nature.

  • Partition Coefficient (Kow): Models bioconcentration using a chemical partition constant.

Page 8: Example of DDT

  • Data on DDT:

    • Water concentration: 0.003 ppm

    • Octanol concentration: 24,000 ppm

    • Kow calculation: Kow = 24,000/0.003 = 8.0 x 10^6

  • Logarithmic Scale: Log Kow = 6.9 indicates lipophilicity.

Page 9: Table of PAHs

  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Variations in toxicant properties:

    • Log KOW, solubility, vapor pressure, half-life, and sorption coefficients listed for 16 PAHs.

Page 10: Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)

  • Measurement: BCF measured in laboratory settings:

    • Single toxicant exposure in controlled conditions.

  • Importance: Relates to hydrophobicity (Kow) and concentration in tissues versus water.

Page 11: BCF in Fish

  • Experiment Methodology: Fish placed in contaminated water (gill exposure only).

    • No food, levels measured at steady-state to establish BCF.

Page 12: Correlations with Log Kow

  • Graph Relation: Log BCF shows strong correlation with log Kow across toxicant series:

    • Higher log Kow often correlates with higher BCF.

Page 13: Limitations of BCF

  • Complex Realities: Laboratory conditions differ from natural water phases

    • Presence of dissolved organic carbon and particulates complicates measurements.

  • Key Reminders: Bioaccumulation incorporates both bioconcentration and biomagnification effects.

Page 14: Biomagnification

  • Definition: Concentration increases in predators through consumption of contaminated prey.

    • Assumes nearly all contaminants from prey are retained by predators.

  • Example Calculation: A 1 kg fish consumes smaller fish and accumulates significant DDT over time.

Page 15: Definitions

  • BCF: Laboratory experiment considering direct water exposure.

  • BAF: Includes all uptake routes, emphasizing comprehensive accumulation processes.

Page 16: Case Study - Clear Lake DDD

  • Historical Context: Use of DDD at Clear Lake, California to control pests, leading to significant ecological impact.

    • Notable deaths in Western Grebe, the need for investigation arose after continued usage.

Page 17: Continued Impacts

  • Analysis Findings: High levels of DDD in fish and grebe tissue noted after pesticide application, highlighting historical bioaccumulation issues.

Page 18: DDT Bioaccumulation

  • Trophic Effects: DDT concentration increases noted with higher trophic levels in the food chain, especially for humans through dietary intake.

Page 19: Bioaccumulation of PCBs

  • PCBs: Persistent, hydrophobic compounds; water and sediment persistence studied, highlighting extended biological effects in Great Lakes.

Page 20: Summary

  • Understanding Relationships: Bioaccumulation and chemical properties are crucial for risk assessments of new contaminants.

  • Persistence vs. Toxicity: Greater persistence may lead to unexpected toxicity in low concentrations, even when inherent toxicity is low.