Breadth theme 1- Reform Acts essay plans
To what extent was reform of the franchise in the years 1780-1928 influenced by extra-parliamentary pressure?
EXTRA PARLIAMENTARY
1832- Attwood’s BPU march- 100,000 strong, united middle/working class agitation, riots in Bristol (Burned down Bishop’s palace- 12 killed), Nottingham castle destroyed, run on banks ‘To stop the Duke, go for gold’ BUT- early demos failed to get bill passed e.g Attwood’s march- only middle class popular pressure succeeded
1867- Hyde Park riots 200,000.
1884-5- little impact. Liberals/ Tories not overly opposed to reform
1918- Impact of soldiers returning from war, fear of unrest/revolution & return of militancy by WSPU (Is this context though…?)
POLITICAL OPPORTUNISM
1832- Whigs in political wilderness 30+ years- middle classes could provide new voter base
1867- Disraeli’s Conservative Reform Bill March 1867- ‘A leap in the dark’- “A step which would destroy the present agitation and destroy Gladstone and Co”
1884-5- Lord Salisbury’s opportunism- could manipulate redistribution of seats in South-East to benefit Tories.
1918- Women’s vote an antidote to working class preference of liberal/Labour.
1928- Cross-party consensus for equal franchise- Baldwin convinced cabinet 1927
POLITICAL COMMITMENT
1832- Earl Grey’s commitment- resigned. Fear of revolution, defence of aristocracy- reform to conserve. BUT lack of commitment to fundamental change? Stephen Lee- “It’s (1832 Act) essence was really to preserve and strengthen aristocracy by removing from it the taint of oligarchy”
1867- Gladstones commitment to extending franchise ‘Pale of the constitution’ (Respectable working class)
1884-5- Gladstone’s commitment to extending principle of Respectable working class to counties (agricultural workers)
1918- Coalition wartime govt, speakers conference (Asquith & Lloyd George- more commitment to enfranchising working men than women)
1928- PM Stanley Baldwin saw opportunity- 1 million+ female membership of Conservatives by 1928
In the years 1815-1928, the reform of parliamentary representation was driven primarily from those excluded from the franchise. How far do you agree with this statement?
How far do you agree that the reform of Parliament in the years 1830-1928 was driven mainly by the desire of parliamentarians to secure political advantages for their parties?
To what extent was the Second Reform Act 1867 the key turning point in the development of democracy in the years 1790-1928?
‘Redistribution of seats was carried out mainly to reflect changes in Britain’s economic landscape’ How far do you agree with this opinion on parliamentary redistribution in the years 1780-1918?
ESSAY Qs- HOW DEMOCRATIC
CRITERIA
Representative institutions (parliament) reflect will of the people
- Universal franchise (men → women) - extension of franchise
- Fairness and equality of electoral system
- Redistribution of seats
- Accountability of parliament
-Political participation, party choice
Democracy VS aristocratic govt which relies on rule of family, inheritance, authority, land, property (property- constitutes nation- if own property, you hold a ‘stake’ in the nation) Lord Durham- ‘To property and good order we attach numbers’
Opposed by Burke (vs Paine’s Rights of Man, Chartists, radical reformers- do not win in 1st half of 19th century)
Industrial, commercial capital becomes increasing interest (Middle class industrialists - lobby to keep working class (employees) out of parliaments)