Memory and Learning

Memory: Effective Long-Term Acquisition & Retrieval

Dr. Tabor’s Office Hours

  • Monday: 2:30-6pm, BOUS 161
  • Wednesday: 9:30-11am, ARJONA 324

Review

  • Successful memorization is supported when to-be-memorized material is encoded in a way that fits structures already present in the mind.
  • When utilized thoughtfully (considering the relationship between existing structures and the materials), the memory will be stronger.

Today's Topics

  • What is the relationship between memory acquisition and retrieval?
    • How does the WAY (e.g., learning environment…) we learn material impact our ability to remember it?
  • State-dependent memory
  • Encoding specificity

Introduction

  • Memory acquisition: The process of storing information in memory.
  • Memory retrieval: The process of finding that memory/information.
  • Today’s main takeaway: The success of memory retrieval can depend on how the methods of acquisition & retrieval correspond.

State-Dependent Learning

  • Definition: Memory retrieval is most efficient when an individual is in the same state of consciousness as they were when the memory was formed.
Experiment: State-Dependent Learning - Divers (Godden & Baddeley, 1975)
  • Method: Divers had to learn some new verbal material.
  • Conditions:
    • Training either ON LAND or UNDERWATER
    • Testing either ON LAND or UNDER WATER (2x2 design)
Results
  • Percentage of Words Correctly Recalled:
    • Test Condition:
      • On land: Training Condition:
        • On land: 13.5 (HIGH)
        • Under water: 8.4 (LOW)
      • Under water: Training Condition:
        • On land: 8.6 (LOW)
        • Under water: 11.4 (HIGH)
  • People do best when tested in the same conditions in which they were trained.
Interpretation
  • In some cases (e.g., early in the learning process), context or environment in which one learns about a topic becomes connected to the learned material of the topic itself.
  • Thus, in these cases, one can more easily remember the material when they’re in the environment in which they learned it.

Encoding Specificity

  • Definition: Memory is improved when information available at encoding is also available at retrieval.
Experiment: Encoding Specificity—Figure-Ground Training Bias (Kanizsa, 1979; Rock, 1983)
  • Ambiguous Figures
  • Training: Participants are primed to see either
    • White figure on black background
    • Black figure on white background
  • Testing: Participants are primed to see either:
    • White figure on black background
    • Black figure on white background
  • Test question: “Did you see this picture during training?”
Sample Stimuli
  • Training: Name each object:
    • TREE
    • CAR
    • VASE
  • Test: Did you see the following image during training?
    • YES
    • YES
    • NO
Results
  • In cases with a switch between training and test (e.g., train white on black, test black on white) participants failed to recognize the ambiguous images (but they did not fail to recognize the unambiguous images like the tree).
Interpretation
  • People do not encode raw sensations. They encode their interpretation of those sensations.
  • Therefore, if the same stimulus is presented in a different perceptual framework (e.g., testing on the same training items with inverse colors) they struggle to remember it.
  • Q: What is the link between Encoding Specificity and Top-Down effects?

Summary

  • We’ve seen two pieces of evidence that the relationship between the way information is acquired and the way it is retrieved is important for effective recall…
    • Encoding specificity
    • State-dependent learning

Review of Memory Phenomena

  1. Depth of Processing (e.g., HOUSE-plate, HOUSE-LOUSE, HOUSE-DWELLING)
  2. Mnemonic devices (e.g., Method of Loci)
  3. Encoding specificity
  4. Context (top-down) effects

Next Week

  • Forgetting