Study Notes on Sustainable Futures and Production Consumption

Lung Cancer and Sustainable Futures

  • Course Details:
    • Ar and Wate Pollin
    • GEES1105 Sustainable Futures
    • Dr. Nichola Harmer, Academic Year 2025/2026
    • Focus on sustainable production and consumption.

Goals and Contextual Overview

  • Glastel Warning: Highlighting critical sustainability challenges.
  • Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns - vital for future resources and ecological balance.

Unsustainable Consumption - Contextual Recap

  • Historical Perspective:
    • Industrial Revolution: Marked a significant rise in consumption.
    • 20th Century Fordism:
      • Led to cheaper items and increased workers’ wages.
      • Broadened customer base, predominantly in the Global North.
    • 1960s: Markets in the Global North reached saturation.
    • Post-Fordism:
      • Production began shifting to the Global South.
      • Increased distance between production and consumption led to diminished traceability and awareness.
      • Resulted in poor working conditions, deviated regulations, and detrimental environmental effects (Kütting, 2014; Scales, 2014).

Environmental Footprint by Income Level

  • High-Income Countries:
    • Leave significantly larger environmental footprints.
    • Material footprint per capita: 10 times that of low-income countries.
    • 2020 and 2021 Fossil Fuel Subsidies:
      • $732 billion in 2020, increased to $375 billion in 2021 following global crises.
    • Average food waste per person: 120 kilograms annually.
    • Over 485 policies for sustainable consumption introduced by 62 countries + EU between 2010-2022.

Ecological Footprint Metrics

  • Over the last 50 years, the ecological footprint, which indicates natural resource consumption, has increased by approximately 190% (Grooten, M. and Almond, R.E.A., 2018, WWF Living Planet Report).

Understanding Sustainable Production and Consumption

  • Understanding Scales: Macro and micro perspectives on production and consumption.
  • Power Relations:
    • Relationships of power and inequality crucially influence sustainability considerations.
  • Sustainability Aspects Include:
    • Economic, social, and environmental dimensions.
    • Key questions include:
      • Who profits?
      • Who benefits?
      • Who is disadvantaged?
      • How are different economies interconnected?
    • Examines inter-generational and intra-generational implications.

Focus on Mobile Phones

  • Ownership Statistics:
    • By 2025, 1 in 5 people globally is a mobile phone owner (International Telecommunications Union, ITU).

The Negative Impacts of Mobile Phones

  • Production Issues:
    • Utilization of conflict minerals: tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold, and cobalt.
    • Negative health impacts of mining practices and resource scarcity.
    • Instances of unfair wages and exploitation, including child labor.
    • Financing of rebel groups, notably in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
    • The production network complexity complicates traceability of components.

E-Waste as a Global Issue

  • Rapidly Growing Domestic Waste:
    • E-waste is the fastest-growing domestic waste category with 62 million tonnes generated in 2022 (Global E-waste Statistics Partnership, GESP, 2024).
    • E-waste generation increasing 5 times faster than recycling rates.
    • Only 22% of e-waste is recycled appropriately, with just 1% of rare earth element demand met via recycling.
    • Environmental and health concerns arise from improper e-waste disposal, impacting marginalized communities.

Positive and Negative Aspects of Mobile Phones

  • Benefits in Developing Nations:
    • Rise in mobile usage since the late-1980s; by 2005, mobiles represented three-quarters of telephones across 19 African nations.
    • Facilitation of mobile banking and social connectivity at low costs.
    • Aid during emergencies and health crises.
    • Support for economic activity (e.g., selling airtime kiosks, job information sharing).

Cultural Icon of Mobile Phones

  • Post-Modern Significance:
    • Mobile phones symbolize the latest industrial revolution and feature prominently in post-modern culture, representing consumption dependencies and technological advancements.
    • Exhibit a "sustainability paradox", with consumer knowledge of negative impacts yet persistent purchasing behaviors.

Addressing Mobile Phone Sustainability Challenges

  • Proposed Solutions:
    • Legislation supporting transparency in supply chains and certification of conflict-free products.
    • Audits on companies and supply chain practices, including voluntary codes of conduct.
    • Frameworks such as the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

Fashion and Environmental Activism

  • Historical Context:
    • Late Victorian era witnessed activism against feather use in women's fashion hats leading to the establishment of the RSPB.

Fast Fashion Analysis

  • Characteristics of Fast Fashion:
    • Rapid production cycles, low-cost operations in the Global South, often resulting in poor labor practices.
    • Fast fashion contributes to a throwaway culture due to low quality and quick turnover in styles.

Supply Chains and the Fashion Industry

  • Global Garment Supply Chain:
    • Connections from farming to manufacturing highlight significant labor and socio-economic disparities.
    • Calls for transparency in garment factories emerge from collective human rights efforts.

Environmental and Economic Impacts of Second-Hand Clothing

  • 2023 Mitumba Waste Report:
    • Over 900 million items sent to Kenya in 2021, with 40% classified as waste.
    • Concerns about environmental, economic, and health impacts of textile disposal.

Recommended Policy Reforms

  • Suggested policy changes to encourage sustainable practices in the fashion industry target improved waste management through legislation and extended producer responsibility.

Corporate Responses and Greenwashing

  • Greenwashing: Companies making unsupported sustainability claims for image enhancement, reflecting deeper issues in the consumption system.

Recommendations for Future Actions

  • Suggestions call for comprehensive legislation to enforce due diligence in supply chains and economic rewards for sustainable practices.

Conclusion

  • Addressing unsustainable production and consumption patterns requires comprehensive strategies across various sectors to achieve Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12 by advocating for transparency, regulatory standards, and fostering consumer awareness.

References

  • A comprehensive reference list to include relevant literature and data sources is available for further research.

  • Multiple studies cited, including works from Brooks, Kutting, Grooten, and reports on the Sustainable Development Goals.