Phylogenetics
Tree of Life and Major Clades
- Three main branches of the Tree of Life: Eubacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes
- Eukaryotes subdivide into major groups: Bikonts (Alveolates, Stramenopiles, Rhizaria), Plants, Excavates, Unikonts (Amoebozoans, Opisthokonts)
- Opisthokonts include Fungi, Choanoflagellates, Animals
- Exam 1 deals with the entire tree of life
What is a phylogeny and what is it used for?
- A phylogeny is a hypothesis about the relationships among organisms based on shared characteristics and evolutionary history
- What it shows: branching patterns that reflect divergence from common ancestors
- Component parts: taxa (tips), nodes (common ancestors), branches (lineages), root (most recent common ancestor of all taxa in the tree)
- How we get it: from morphological characters, molecular data (DNA/RNA/protein), and computational methods (cladistics, phylogenetic inference)
- What we use it for: understanding evolutionary relationships, naming clades, tracing character evolution, informing biology and conservation
Cladistics and character states (Page 3 content)
- Phylogenetic analysis (cladistics) uses characters to reconstruct phylogenies, focusing on synapomorphies
- Key character terms:
- Homologous: derived from the same common ancestor (not homoplasious)
- Homologous vs homoplasious distinction matters for correct inference
- Apomorphic: derived character state (recently derived; not plesiomorphic)
- Plesiomorphic: ancestral character state
- Autapomorphy: a derived character unique to a single taxon
- Shared: character present in more than one taxon (not just a single occurrence)
- Synapomorphy: shared derived character, identifies a clade
- Monophyletic group: includes a common ancestor and all of its descendants (in contrast to paraphyletic or polyphyletic groups)
- Uses in classification: to name taxa and ensure taxa reflect true evolutionary relationships
- Key exam-style questions (from Page 3):
- Why are only certain characters phylogenetically informative?
- What is the purpose of an outgroup?
- Why should named taxa be monophyletic?
Synapomorphy, homology, and sequence-based illustration (Page 4)
- Symplesiomorphy (A): shared ancestral character
- Synapomorphy (IC): shared derived character that defines a clade
- Autapomorphy (E): unique derived character in a single lineage
- Apomorphy (C): derived character state (not necessarily shared)
- Plesiomorphy (A): ancestral character state
- Common ancestor ↔ descendants (diagrammatic example of character-state evolution)
- Example with sequence alignment (illustrates how changes define synapomorphies):
- Alignment context shows insertion/deletion events that differentiate descendants
- Insertion in descendant 1 can produce a shared derived state with other descendants if present in multiple taxa
- Deletion in descendant 2 changes the character state relative to the ancestor
- Takeaway: synapomorphies are the basis for defining clades; autapomorphies/plesiomorphies help polarize character changes when using an outgroup
A simple sequence-based example illustrating character evolution (Page 4 recap)
- Aligned sequences illustrate how gains and losses alter character states across taxa
- Example notes:
- 1) Insertion in descendant 1 changes the character state compared to the ancestor
- 2) Deletion in descendant 2 changes the character state relative to the ancestor
- Practical point: alignment reveals where changes occur and helps identify synapomorphies that unite groups
A concrete dataset: sequences across several mammals and an outgroup (Page 5)
- Dataset includes species and their gene sequences across sites, used to infer relationships
- Listed taxa and sample data (concise representation):
- Cow: sequences shown as lines below; site numbers provided (e.g., 192)
- Cow:
- AGTCCCCAAAGTGAAGGAGA
- CTATGGTTCCTAAGCACAAG
- 192
- GAAATGCCCTTCCCTAAATA
- Deer: sequences with gaps/ambiguous characters (e.g., GX representing ambiguity)
- Whale: sequences with some gaps/ambiguous characters
- Hippo: sequences with minor variations
- Pig: sequences
- Peccary: sequences
- Outgroup: Camel, with its own set of sequences
- Notable feature: site 166 involves a G vs C difference and a gap (G- C) in the alignment
- Purpose: demonstrate how a multiple-sequence alignment can be used to identify shared derived characters (synapomorphies) and to root a tree using an outgroup
- Practical note: gaps and ambiguous characters are common in alignments and must be treated carefully in inference
Taxon list and bootstrap-like support (Page 6)
- A list of taxa with numerical values (likely bootstrap support or other metrics) alongside group names
- Examples of taxa/groups referenced: obscura, punctiferella, piperella (Montana, Idaho, Washington, California), mitellae (Idaho, Washington), Poja, Polymixiiformes, Paracanthopterygii, Gamo, Zefa, Zeioidei, Zene, etc.
- Some numbers observed (interpreted as support values):
- 56, 56
- 100, 100, 60, 0, 94, 100, 100
- The page seems to present a phylogenetic tree with branch support values next to nodes
- Practical implication: bootstrap or posterior support numbers indicate confidence in inferred relationships
Major animal lineages and key developmental features (Page 7)
- Sponges and early-diverging animals:
- Choanocytes; spicules
- Siliceous spicules
- Glass sponges; Demosponges
- Sponges (Chapter 31)
- Embryology and tissue layers:
- Two embryonic cell layers; nervous system present in some early groups; simplifications and unique cell junctions in certain lineages; extracellular matrix contains collagen and proteoglycans
- Protostomes vs Deuterostomes (Chapter 32–33 framing):
- Proto-stomes: arrow worms, Lophotrochozoans, Bilateral symmetry along an anterior-posterior axis; three embryonic cell layers; Blastopore develops into mouth; Exoskeleton molting; Ecdysozoans
- Deuterostomes: Blastopore develops into anus; Bilaterians (triploblastic); Echinoderms; Hemichordates; Notochord; Chordates; Eumetazoans
- Key terms:
- PROTOSTOMES vs DEUTEROSTOMES
- Bilaterians (triploblastic)
- Major groups listed (e.g., Cnidarians are diploblastic; Placozoans, Ctenophores, Calcareous sponges, etc.)
- Takeaway: this section maps the major animal branches and their defining developmental and anatomical features, framing how phylogenies group these lineages
Practice questions (Page 8): cladistics concepts in action
- 1) At site 5361, which character cannot be used in cladistic analysis because it is an autapomorphy?
- Options: a. T for Ateles, b. T for Homo, c. G for Pan, 2) The outgroup (Ateles) in the dataset:
- a. Is not related at all to any of the others.
- b. Is used to determine which characters are homoplasious.
- c. Is used to distinguish apomorphic from plesiomorphic characters.
- d. Has a younger common ancestor than the others.
- e. Has only apomorphic characters outgroup
- 2) The outgroup is used to define character polarity and root the tree; it helps distinguish ancestral vs derived states and identify homoplasy
- Practical note: autapomorphies do not define clades; they are unique to a single taxon and are usually not informative for branching patterns
Practice questions (Page 9): viral phylogeny prompts
- 1) According to this phylogeny, the bat viruses are:
- a. Monophyletic
- b. Sister to the whale viruses
- c. Plesiomorphic
- d. Paraphyletic
- 2) The sister group to the human viruses is:
- a. Bat viruses
- b. Whale viruses
- c. Camel viruses
- Note: these questions require interpreting a shown phylogeny; answers depend on the tree topology provided in the material
True/False review (Page 10)
1. Phylogenetic analysis makes use of all characteristics of all organisms included in the analysis.
- Generally false: not all characters are equally informative; some are autapomorphies, homoplasies, or less informative for resolving relationships
2. A molecular phylogeny can be used to determine how long ago organisms shared a common ancestry.
- True: molecular clocks and sequence divergence data can estimate divergence times under appropriate models
3. Evidence from cell biology and genetics suggests that all organisms are ultimately descended from a single common ancestor.
- True: the concept of universal common ancestry
4. A paraphyletic group is one that has a common ancestor, but not all of the descendants of that common ancestor are included in the group.
- True: paraphyly excludes some descendant lineages from the group
Connections and takeaway:
- Outgroups root trees and help polarize character states
- Synapomorphies define clades; monophyly is the preferred criterion for classification
- Overlapping data types (morphology, molecular data) can support or challenge inferred relationships
- Real-world relevance: understanding disease evolution, host–pathogen relationships, and biodiversity patterns
Key terms to memorize:
- Monophyly, Paraphyly, Polyphyly
- Homology vs Homoplasy
- Plesiomorphy vs Apomorphy vs Synapomorphy vs Autapomorphy
- Synapomorphy as the basis for recognizing clades
- Outgroup and rooting
Quick recap formulas (conceptual):
- Monophyletic group: ancestor ∪ all descendants
- Paraphyletic group: ancestor ∪ some but not all descendants
- Phylogeny rooting relies on an outgroup to polarize character state changes
Use this structure to study for Exam 1: be able to identify character states as ancestral vs derived, recognize synapomorphies, determine whether a group is monophyletic, and interpret simple sequence-based or morphology-based datasets to infer relationships