Lecture 14

Trophic Interactions

Overview

  • Trophic interactions involve the relationships between producers, consumers, and decomposers in ecosystems.

  • Key aspects include:

    • Types of trophic interactions

    • Resource/prey adaptations (defenses)

    • Consumer/predator adaptations

    • Population limitation and predator-prey cycles

    • Modeling predator-prey cycles (Lotka-Volterra models)

    • Functional and numeric responses

    • Applications of these concepts

Lynx and Hares

  • The snowshoe hares are a significant part of the lynx diet, making up approximately 75-80% in certain regions.

  • The relationship between lynx and snowshoe hares serves as a practical example for studying predator-prey dynamics.

Population Dynamics of Lynx and Hares

  • Predator-prey populations often oscillate cyclically over time, indicative of interdependent population dynamics.

    • Example: The cycles of lynx and hare populations are synchronized and occur roughly every 10 years.

  • The population sizes of both species vary significantly over time, with hare populations peaking and subsequently influencing lynx populations:

    • In 1850, lynx populations were around 3, increasing to an estimated 16 by 1925, while hare populations oscillated ranging significantly alongside.

Population Oscillations

  • Population oscillations are evident in predator-prey interactions, wherein:

    • The prey population size influences the predator population size and vice versa.

    • The lengths of these cycles are variable, often reduced in smaller organisms.

  • The concept originates from Gause's work in the 1930s, which demonstrated predictable oscillations in consumer-resource interactions.

Lotka-Volterra Ecosystem Models

Predator-Prey Dynamics

  • Fundamental equations unpinning the model:

    • Prey population change: dNdt=rN−cNP\frac{dN}{dt} = rN - cNP

    • Where:

      • NN = population size of prey

      • rr = intrinsic per capita growth rate of prey

      • cc = capture rate (predation rate) of prey by predators.

    • Predator population change: dPdt=acNP−dP\frac{dP}{dt} = acNP - dP

    • Where:

      • PP = population size of predators

      • aa = conversion rate of prey to predator growth

      • dd = death rate of predators.

Assumptions of the Lotka-Volterra Model

  • Assumptions include:

    • The prey population can increase exponentially in the absence of predators.

    • The predator population can only persist when prey is present.

    • Individual predators can consume an infinite number of prey.

    • There are random encounters between predators and prey.

    • No density-dependent factors or “real foraging behavior.”

Equilibrium Isoclines

  • Isoclines represent all points for both populations where there is zero growth:

    • For prey: rc=P\frac{r}{c} = P

    • For predators: N=macN = \frac{m}{ac}

  • Stability analysis:

    • If rN=cNPrN = cNP, then the prey population has zero growth; when prey increases, predators tend to follow and vice versa.

  • Phase-plane diagram shows the population trajectory of prey and predator jointly:

    • When both populations are at the equilibrium point, cycles are rare, leading to regular oscillations elsewhere.

Functional and Numeric Responses of Predators

Responses to Prey Abundance

  • Numerical Response

    • Change in predator abundance in response to changes in prey abundance, influencing predator populations either through birth rates or immigration/emigration.

Functional Responses

  • Relationship between prey density and predator feeding rate.

  • Types include:

    • Type I: Linear increase in prey consumption with rising prey densities, often unrealistic due to ignoring handling time.

    • Type II: Consumption plateaus as prey density increases, factoring in handling time and predation limits.

    • Type III: S-shaped response seen in generalist predators where feeding rate increases but plateaus at higher densities due to prey switching and search image formation.

Practical Applications of Consumer-Resource Dynamics

Biocontrol Example: Prickly Pear Cactus in Australia

  • Introduction of the prickly pear cactus led to ecological issues, spreading across 20 million hectares.

  • Introduction of the Cactoblastis moth in 1925 effectively controlled the cactus but did not eliminate it completely.

    • The impact led to a monument in Queensland commemorating the success of the biological control agent.

Conservation Applications

  • These models help predict consequences of population changes in ecological settings, aiding in:

    • Management strategies for wildlife and pest control.

    • Conservation efforts directed towards threatened and endangered species.

Assessment Questions and Applications

  • Discussion points encourage consideration of ecological meanings behind model predictions, not just numerical solutions.

  • Assignments encourage visual representation of population cycles, predicted responses, and the connection between phase-plane dynamics and real population trajectories.