NHR 4811 Health Research Methods - Comprehensive Study Guide
Examination Details and Overview
- Institution: University of Namibia (UNAM), Faculty of Health Sciences, Department: School of Nursing, General Nursing Science.
- Module: Health Research Methods (NHR 4811).
- Exam Period: May/June 2022 Regular Examinations.
- Duration: 3 Hours.
- Total Marks: 100.
- Examiners: Takaedza Munangatire and Mr. Epafras Anyolo.
- Internal Moderator: Dr. K. Amakali.
- External Moderator: Dr. RR. Marie Modeste (Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa).
Foundations of the Research Process
- Initial Step in Research: Identifying the research problem is considered the initial and one of the most significant steps in conducting the research process.
- Researcher Roles in Nursing Practice:
- Consumer: A nurse who reads research articles and incorporates research findings into clinical practice.
- Primary Investigator: The lead individual responsible for the conduct of the research.
- Collaborator: An individual working with others to produce research.
- Producer: An individual who designs and executes research studies.
- Reasoning Types:
- Inductive Reasoning: Reasoning from specific observations to broader generalizations (e.g., reasoning from a single diabetic patient to all diabetic patients).
- Deductive Reasoning: Reasoning from the general to the specific (e.g., reasoning from all chronically ill patients to a single chronically ill patient, or using a standard care plan for a specific patient).
- Comparison to Nursing Process: Problem identification in the research process is equivalent to the Nursing Diagnosis step in the nursing process.
Research Sources and Documentation
- Primary Sources: A journal article about a study that used large, previously unpublished databases generated by a statistics bureau is an example of a primary source. Textbook and commentaries are generally secondary sources.
- APA Formatting References: In the reference
Harris, R. M., Bausell, R. B., Scott, D. E., Hetherington, S. E., & Kavanagh, K. H. (1998). An intervention for changing high-risk HIV behaviours of African American drug-dependent women. Research in Nursing and Health, 21(3), pp. 239-250.:- 21: Refers to the Volume number.
- 3: Refers to the Issue number.
- pp. 239-250: Refers to the page range.
- Academic Attention: The Abstract (or sometimes the Title) is the portion of the research report used to capture the reader's attention.
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research Paradigms
- Qualitative Research Characteristics:
- Studies are conducted in natural settings.
- Data collection involves relating perceptions and exploring meanings (e.g., "Subjects were asked to relate their perceptions of pain").
- Phrases common in reports: "Researchers sought to explore the meaning of the hospital experience."
- Research approaches include Phenomenology (describing lived experiences) and Grounded Theory (study of processes, social structures, and interactions).
- Quantitative Research Characteristics:
- Systematic and objective design with an emphasis on control and precision (Rigor).
- Data tend to be numeric.
- Phrases common in reports: "A convenience sample was chosen," or "The hypothesis of this study is…"
- Rigor: Defined as the amount of control and precision exerted by the methodology.
Variables and Definitions
- Conceptual Definitions: These are important because the meanings of terms may differ depending on the study framework; they provide the theoretical meaning of a concept.
- Operational Definitions: Specified what the researchers must do to measure the concept and collect needed information.
- Types of Variables:
- Continuous Variable: Can take on values from zero to more than 100, where values are not restricted to whole numbers ($1.2.4$).
- Discrete Variable: A variable with a finite number of values between any two points, representing distinct quantities ($1.2.1$).
- Categorical Variable: Variables that take on a handful of discrete non-quantitative values ($1.2.2$).
- Dichotomous Variable: Categorical variables that take on only two values (e.g., yes/no, treated/untreated) ($1.2.3$).
- Dependent Variable: The outcome variable (e.g., in a study on preoperative support, the dependent variables are "perception of pain" and "request for analgesics").
Research Design, Hypotheses, and Control
- Levels of Researcher Control:
- Experimental Research: High researcher control, random sampling, and often a laboratory setting. Involves at least partial control to implement study treatment.
- Quasi-experimental: Involves manipulation of an independent variable but lacks either random assignment or a control group.
- Correlational: Examines relationships between variables without manipulation.
- Descriptive: Describes characteristics of a population or phenomenon.
- Hypothesis Types:
- Directional Hypotheses: Specifies the expected direction of the relationship (e.g., "The risk of falling increases with the age of the patient").
- Non-directional Hypotheses: Predicts a relationship exists but does not specify the direction (e.g., "There is a relationship between the age of a patient and the risk of falling").
- Experimental Design Indication: Hypotheses comparing groups (e.g., "The incidence of UTIs will be greater in patients whose catheters are irrigated frequently than in those irrigated less frequently") indicate experimental or quasi-experimental designs.
- Research Categories:
- Applied Research: Aimed at solving practical problems (e.g., "Does telephone follow-up improve medication compliance?").
- Basic Research: Aimed at extending the base of knowledge for the sake of knowledge.
Feasibility and Ethics
- Feasibility: Determined by examining the availability of subjects, researcher expertise, time, and resources. Obtaining written permission from facilities to access patients is an example of establishing the feasibility of a study.
- Research Settings:
- Natural/Field Setting: Data collection in a participant's home (e.g., studying caregivers of stroke victims).
- Highly Controlled/Laboratory: Specialized environments designed to minimize extraneous variables.
Statistical Analysis and Interpretation
- Test for Comparing Two Means: A T-test (Independent T-test) is applied to compare mean knowledge scores between two groups (e.g., Male 56% vs Female 66%).
- Test for Comparing More Than Two Means: ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) is used when comparing means among three or more groups (e.g., comparing scores across four different years of study).
- P-Value Interpretation:
- If p=0.03: The result is statistically significant (usually p<0.05), indicating a low probability that the difference occurred by chance.
- If p=0.07: The result is not statistically significant (usually p>0.05), indicating that differences among groups might be due to chance.
- Correlation:
- Pearson’s r: Used to test the relationship between two continuous variables (e.g., Knowledge scores and Practice scores).
- Interpretation of +0.7 at p=0.05: A strong positive correlation that is statistically significant.
- Chi-Square (χ2): A non-parametric test used for cross-tabulations to determine the association between categorical variables (e.g., the relationship between gender and smoking status).
- Cause and Effect: Regression analysis (specifically Linear or Logistic Regression) is an inferential statistical test used to determine the predictive relationship or cause-and-effect among variables.
The Research Problem Statement
- Definition: A situation in need of a solution, improvement, or a discrepancy between the way things are and the way they need to be (Brink, 2018).
- Purpose: To provide a clear rationale for the study and identify the gap in knowledge or practice that the research intends to fill.
- Key Questions to Answer:
- What is wrong with the current situation?
- Where is the gap in knowledge?
- Why is the problem important?
- Who is affected by the problem?
- What are the consequences of not solving the problem?
- What is the evidence that the problem exists?
Sampling Concepts
- Target Population: The entire group of individuals or objects to which researchers are interested in generalizing the conclusions (e.g., all registered female nurses in teaching hospitals).
- Accessible Population: The portion of the target population that is available to the researcher (e.g., nurses in the six specific hospitals that granted permission).
- Sampling Error: The difference between a sample statistic used to estimate a population parameter and the actual but unknown value of the parameter. It is important because it indicates the precision of the research findings.
- Stratified Random Sampling: A technique where the population is divided into subgroups (strata) to ensure that specific groups are adequately represented.
- Sample Adequacy Criteria:
- Representativeness of the population.
- Sample size (power analysis).
- Homogeneity vs heterogeneity of the population.
- Nature of the research (qualitative vs quantitative).
- Resources and time available.
- Sampling method used (probability vs non-probability).
- Expected attrition/response rates.
- Sensitivity of the measurement tools.
- Number of variables being studied.
- Level of precision/significance required.
Data Collection Instruments
- Questionnaire Design: Typically organized into sections such as Demographic Data (Section A), Knowledge (Section B), Attitudes (Section C), and Practices (Section D).
- Validity: Ensuring the instrument measures what it is intended to measure (e.g., Content validity through expert review).
- Reliability: Consistency of the measurement.
- Cronbach’s Alpha: A measure of internal consistency.
- Score Interpretation: A Cronbach alpha of 0.5 is generally considered poor or unacceptable reliability (usually α>0.7 is required for a reliable instrument).