AP Human Geography - Unit 6: Services & Urban Patterns Notes
Unit 6: Services & Urban Patterns
Services
- Tertiary Sector: Broad service sector.
- Quaternary: Data-driven services.
- Quinary: Decision-making services.
Economic Base of US Cities
- Basic Industries:
- Sells goods/services primarily outside the community.
- Brings new money into the local economy.
- Non-basic Industries:
- Sells goods/services primarily within the community.
- Circulates existing money within the local economy.
- Post-industrial Repositioning:
- Cities attempt to redefine themselves after deindustrialization.
- Technology Corridor: Government invests in technological infrastructure to attract businesses.
- Technopole: Clustering of technology businesses, often spurred by universities or research institutions.
Urban Hierarchies
- Christaller’s Central Place Theory:
- Market Area/Hinterland: Nodal/functional region served by a central place.
- Range: The maximum distance a consumer is willing to travel for a good or service.
- Threshold: The minimum population required to support a particular business or service.
- Nesting (Hexagons): Larger settlements offer services of smaller ones.
- Consumers access services at the closest location offering the desired service.
- Hierarchy of Services:
World/Global Cities
- Clustering of Services:
- The entire world is their hinterland.
- Concentration of corporate headquarters
- Disproportionate number of wealthy individuals.
- Luxury services and entertainment options.
- High global influence
- High-income inequality.
- Alpha ++ Cities:
- NYC, London (formerly Tokyo)
- Other Alpha Cities:
- Chicago, LA, SF, Washington DC
- Paris, Brussels
- Shanghai, Beijing, Singapore, HK
Rank-Size Rule vs. Primate City
- Rank-Size Rule:
- The nth largest city is 1/nth the size of the largest city.
- nth city=n1∗largest city
- Indicates a more even distribution of wealth and services; common in MDCs (More Developed Countries).
- Primate City:
- One city is disproportionately large and influential within a country.
- Wealth and services are clustered; common in LDCs (Less Developed Countries).
Urban Sizes
- Megacity: > 10 million residents.
- Metacity: > 20 million residents.
- Megalopolis: Blending/overlap of urban areas (e.g., Boston to Washington DC).
- City Beautiful Movement (Burnham)
- Beaux Arts, Modernism, Postmodernism
Central Business District (CBD)
- Most accessible location.
- Former retail hub; current hub for professional services.
- Bid-Rent Theory:
- Land value is highest in the CBD due to accessibility.
- Businesses compete for this space.
- Intensive Land Use:
- Skyscrapers, subways, loading docks
Urban Models
- Concentric Zone (Burgess, 1923):
- Bid-Rent Theory: Land cost decreases with distance from the CBD.
- Results in rings of similar activities, housing, and socioeconomic groups based on distance from CBD.
- Density Gradient: Population density decreases with distance from CBD.
- High land cost results in more intensive land usage close to CBD
- Zones/Rings:
- CBD
- Increasing residential density (yuppies).
- Zone of Transition
- Historically close to railroad hubs, factories, warehouses, and tenements.
- Point of entry neighborhoods.
- Factories leave with highways, now gentrified for residences/services
- Working Class
- Multi-family housing
- Lower density due to multi-to-single-family conversion, zones of abandonment.
- Middle Class/Better Residences
- Small single-family housing
- Stable density reinforced through TODs.
- Commuter Zone
- Large suburban homes/yards
- Increased density with in-filling and New Urbanism, multi-family housing for industrial workers.
- Increasing “city” problems.
- Sector Model (Hoyt, 1939):
- Wedges develop from the CBD outward.
- Wedges adjacent to “related” activities
- Industry ↔ transport ↔ working-class residential ↔ “disamenities”.
- High-income residential → “amenities”.
- Multiple Nuclei (Harris/Ullman, 1945):
- CBD decentralizing.
- Other nodes of economic activity attract related activities.
- Airport ← warehouses, convention center.
- Industry ← working-class housing.
- University ← bookstores, coffeeshops.
- Peripheral/Galactic Model (Harris, 1960):
- Post-automobile…ring highway added to Multiple Nuclei model.
- Edge cities (jobs>bedrooms, population increase during day) develop along ring highway.
- Rival CBD.
- Often have a focus.
- Nbrook/Deerfield = Insurance/Pharmaceuticals.
- Oakbrook = McDonalds
- Schaumburg = retail, offices
- European Model:
- Central city reserved for tourism.
- Wealth higher in the city, poorer on outskirts.
- Paris = Bobigny (Algerian Muslims)
- Ghettoization.
- Islamic Cities:
- Islamic courtyards (purdah), Iconoclasm architecture/art, mosques, minarets.
- Latin American (Griffin/Ford, 1980):
- Commercial “spine”, extension of CBD
- Sandwiched by high-income residential.
- Informal or squatter settlements
- On outskirts, along disamenities.
- Most similar to Hoyt’s Sector Model.
- SE Asian Model (McGee 1967):
- Port is focus (SE Asia = semi-periphery)
- CBD (separate clusters = Western, Govt)
- “Alien” commercial sectors (Chinese/Indian).
- Sub-Saharan Africa (de Blij 1977):
- 3 CBDs (Old Colonial, Traditional (indigenous), Informal/periodic market.
- Ethnic neighborhoods.
- Mining (periphery resource extraction).
- Squatter/informal settlements.
Inner-City Social Issues
- How to fix deteriorating housing/urban decay/blight?
- Causes of Urban Decay:
- Waves of new immigrants, impoverished minority groups, disinvestment by absentee landlords.
- Redlining (prejudicial lending).
- Blockbusting.
- White flight → eroding tax base (Detroit).
- Black flight (Chicago loses 200k black residents from 2000 – 2010).
- Zones of abandonment /“depopulation”.
Redevelopment Efforts:
- Urban Renewal (mid-20th century):
- Public housing projects (e.g., Cabrini Green).
- Ghettoization (concentrates poverty in isolated communities).
- Loses public support/funding cut.
- Disrepair and mismanagement (broken elevators).
- High crime, drugs, gangs.
- Seen as failure, demolished beginning in 1990s.
- Public/Private Redev. (late 20th century – current):
- Govt gives incentives for private developers to create mixed-income communities.
- Seen as “land grab” by middle/upper-classes of valuable locations.
- Poor displaced, unable to secure placement in new communities, vouchers given to move elsewhere.
- Developers pay to avoid offering affordable set-aside housing units.
- Neo-liberalism.
- Market-based urban redevelopment (1970s – current):
- Gentrification (middle-class owners replace low-income renters in distressed inner-city neighborhoods).
- Like proximity to amenities/CBD, walkability, low prices in distressed areas, vintage architecture.
- Transit-oriented development (TOD) – brings density, affordability to gentrifying areas.
- Results:
- Crime ↘, rents, property values, services ↗.
- Poor/elderly displaced.
- Ethnic/racial change.
- Brownfields: Lack of redevelopment in areas seen as environmentally contaminated by prior industrial use.
- US Steel South Works (87th and Lakefront)
Public Transit
- Makes urban living possible.
- BUT fares don’t cover costs, requires public funding.
- Service reduced, fares ↗, ridership decreases
Differentiation within the “urban area”
- Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs)/metro area.
- “The city”/central city/municipality
- Traditional growth through “annexation”.
- Suburbs
- “Inner” – inside ring highway
- “Outer”, the even farther = “exurbs”
- Multiple layers of local govt. (City, Township, County, special districts like water, sanitation, school districts).
Suburban Challenges/Solutions:
- Traditional single-use zoning separates residential, commercial, and industrial functions.
- Creates dependence on autos.
- High per capita pollution.
- Lack of walkability.
- Placelessness.
- Urban sprawl.
- Smart Growth/Slow Growth
- New Urbanism (mixed-use zoning to create higher density, walkable communities).
- Reduce pollution, sustainability.
- Usually located by commuter train hubs
- Greenbelts (UK)
- Restricts development at edge of urban area
- Encourages un-filling, vertical development
Development of Cities Timeline:
- Agricultural Villages (circa 8,000 BC)
- Hunting-gathering to settled farming
- Cities/First Urban Revolution (3500 BCE)
- Fertile Crescent/Mesopotamia/Sumer
- Social stratification
- The Middle Ages (500-1300 AD)
- Silk Road (Samarkand), Africa Gold/Salt trade (Timbuktu)
- Era of European exploration (1400-1700 AD)
- Coastal cities (rise of London)
- Second Urban Revolution (mid-1700s)
- 2nd Agricultural Revolution, Industrial Revolution
- Industrial Cities Improve (late 1800s – current)
- City reforms, sanitation, City Beautiful Movement
- Borchert’s Model of Urban Evolution: links American urbanization to the dominant transport. mode of era
- Sail-Wagon Epoch (1790-1830)
- Iron Horse Epoch (1830-70)
- Steel Rail Epoch (1870-1920)
- Auto-Air-Amenity Epoch (1920-70)
- Satellite-Electronic-Jet Epoch (1970-?)
- City’s importance depends on SITUATION