Unit 11 Notes: Relational Transgressions Part 1
Overview of Relationship Deterioration and De-escalation
Focus on factors leading to relationship deterioration, particularly relational transgressions.
Researchers classify interpersonal communication into "dark side" and "bright side."
For this context, the dark side involves harmful behaviors and communications in relationships.
Relational Transgressions
Relational transgressions defined as violations of relational rules (implicit or explicit).
Importance of discussing relational transgressions in the context of emotional pain.
Emotional Pain in Relationships
Emotional pain often arises from actions of those closest to us (partners, friends, family).
Strongest connections can lead to the most significant hurt.
Devaluation defined: feeling unappreciated or unimportant. Can occur at: - Individual Level: Example of job loss accompanied by hurtful comments about work ethic. - Relational Level: Example of a partner communicating they no longer love you, or through unfaithfulness, which devalues the relationship.
Types of Hurtful Communication
Two main types of hurtful behaviors discussed: - Relational Transgressions - Hurtful Messages
Characteristics of Relational Transgressions
Severity: Varies from minor incidents (e.g., not returning a call) to severe violations (e.g., cheating).
Perceptions: Different interpretations of what constitutes a transgression can lead to conflict. Examples include: - A friend hanging out with a disliked person. - Dating a friend's ex.
Consequences: Can lead to irreparable damage in the relationship.
Common Transgressions Among College Students
Top identified transgressions: - Having sex with another person. - Wanting to/date others. - Deceiving another about something significant.
Discussion prompts: - Which transgression would cause the most harm if it occurred only once? - Are there additional behaviors to consider for modern relationships?
Hurtful Messages
Defined: Words that elicit psychological pain, contradicting the saying "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."
Perceptions of Intent: Messages perceived as intentional are more damaging.
Example shared by instructor about being called selfish and inconsiderate leads to emotional pain due to perceived targeting.
Types of Hurtful Messages
Five common types: 1. Evaluations: Negative judgments about worth or quality of partner/relationship (e.g., "this relationship is a waste of my time"). 2. Accusations: Claims about another's faults or actions (e.g., "this is all your fault"). 3. Informative Statements: Disclosures of unwanted information (e.g., "I was on the rebound"). 4. Directives: Commands that conflict with partner's desires (e.g., "don't call me anymore"). 5. Expressions of Desire: Statements about preferences (e.g., "I wish you were more like my ex").
Infidelity and its Impact on Relationships
Infidelity seen as particularly hurtful; often considered the least forgivable behavior.
Importance of the method of discovery in reactions to infidelity: - Finding out from a third party vs. witnessing it directly vs. confession by the partner.
Research suggests that unexpected confessions (without prompting) are often more forgivable.
Types of infidelity discussed: - Sexual Infidelity: Engaging in sexual activity with someone else. - Emotional Infidelity: Investing love and attention into someone else. - Communicative Infidelity: Engaging in sexual activity to communicate dissatisfaction to the partner.
Causes of Infidelity
Leading causes identified: - Dissatisfaction with the current relationship. - Boredom with the relationship. - Boosting self-esteem or confidence. - Sexual incompatibility. - Seeking alternative support or excitement.
Gender Differences in Response to Infidelity
Evolutionary Psychology perspective suggests men prioritize sexual fidelity due to paternal investment concerns; women prioritize emotional fidelity due to relationship resource concerns.
Difficulties with evolutionary theory include: - Assumption of inherent differences rather than learned behaviors. - Cultural influences on gender responses are often ignored.
Double Shot Hypothesis suggests people respond to both types of infidelity with concerns about whether both actions (emotional and sexual) are occurring.
Research shows physiological responses vary by gender when imagining infidelity scenarios, supporting both perspectives.
Behavioral Cues Indicating Infidelity
Signs of Sexual Infidelity: - Observable changes in partner's sexual behavior. - Indirect signs like unfamiliar scents or exaggerated affection. - Sexual interest changes (either increased or decreased).
Signs of Emotional Infidelity: - Emotional disengagement or passive rejection. - Negative communication or reluctance to discuss certain individuals. - Inattentiveness towards the partner.
Signs Indicative of Both Types: - Decreased effort into the relationship or increased contact with a third party.
Upcoming Topics
Next discussion will cover Jealousy and Deception as further relational transgressions.
Overview of Relational Transgressions
Relational transgressions are violations of implicit or explicit rules within relationships.
The severity of transgressions can vary greatly: - Minor violations: forgetting important events, focusing on a phone during quality time ("fubbing"). - Severe violations: infidelity, cheating that can lead to relationship dissatisfaction and deterioration.
Examining Jealousy as a Transgression
Jealousy arises commonly in response to relationship transgressions, particularly suspected infidelity.
Jealousy can also be categorized as a transgression if it manifests from unfounded suspicions.
Example of Jealousy: - A partner may feel jealous over their significant other working closely with someone perceived as a threat, despite reassurances that the relationship is purely professional. - This leads to accusations or surveillance behaviors, signaling a lack of trust, thus breaching mutual trust, an implicit relationship rule.
Defining Jealousy
Jealousy: - Concerns about possibly losing something of value (e.g., a partner, friendship, or social status) due to interference from a third party.
Related Concepts Distinct from Jealousy: - Envy: - Wanting something valuable possessed by someone else due to feelings of inadequacy (e.g., desiring aspects of another’s life). - Rivalry: - Competition between two parties for something neither currently possesses (e.g., dating the same person, sibling rivalry).
Types of Jealousy
Romantic Jealousy: Belief in a third-party threat to the romantic relationship.
Sexual Jealousy: Concern about a third party wanting to engage sexually with one’s partner.
Friend Jealousy: Worry that a partner's friendships threaten the relationship.
Family Jealousy: Fears of losing a partner in favor of their family.
Activity Jealousy: Concerns that a partner’s activities (e.g., sports, work) will detract from the relationship.
Power Jealousy: Feeling a loss of influence or authority in the relationship to others, such as a parent.
Intimacy Jealousy: Belief that a partner shares more intimate communication with another, whether in friendships or other relationships.
Understanding Jealous Thoughts and Feelings
Cognitive Responses: - Evaluative appraisals of rival relationships, primary and secondary. - Primary Appraisals: General evaluations of threats (e.g., questioning partner's loyalty). - Secondary Appraisals: Specific evaluations regarding possible causes, outcomes, and alternatives. - Example Questions: - "Do they love someone else?" - "How serious is the threat?"
Emotional Responses: - Jealousy triggers feelings of fear, anger, sadness, guilt, and envy. - Positive emotions can also arise, reflecting a sense of attachment and care. - Jealousy, while negative, can communicate love and concern, suggesting relational investment.
Responses to Jealousy
Jealousy can elicit various responses categorized as: - Constructive Responses: Integrative communication to openly discuss feelings and resolve issues. - Destructive Responses: Negative communication such as arguing, sarcasm, or withdrawal. - Avoidant Responses: Ignoring the issue, potentially leading to further complications. - Rival-Focused Responses: Managing or confronting the perceived threat directly.
The Role of Communication in Jealousy
Integrative communication is an essential response when jealousy arises.
Effective communication helps to express negative emotions constructively, fostering empathy and understanding.
Avoiding shutdown or withdrawal enhances relational maintenance.
Transitioning to Deception
Defining Deception vs. Lying
Deception: Broadly defined as managing verbal and non-verbal messages to mislead someone into believing something false.
Deception is an umbrella term covering various misleading behaviors; lying is one specific type.
Example of Deception: Conducting an experiment with hidden recording devices without lying explicitly about recording consent.
Lying: Specific messages that falsify information intentionally without any prior notification.
Misconceptions: - Equivocation, concealment, exaggeration, and half-truths are also forms of deception but do not always constitute lying directly.
Types of Deception
Equivocation: Indirect or ambiguous responses that mislead without outright lying.
Concealment: Omitting important details in communication to obscure the truth.
Exaggeration: Stretching or enhancing the truth in various contexts.
Half-Truths: Providing partial truth while omitting critical aspects to mislead.
Motivation Behind Deception
Deception may serve self-serving motives or relationship-focused motives.
Self-Focused Motives: Maintaining self-image, avoiding embarrassment, or criticism.
Relationship-Focused Motives: Protecting a partner’s feelings or maintaining relational harmony.
Detecting Deception
Assumptions of truth bias make it difficult for individuals to detect deception in close relationships. - Truth bias leads to a tendency to believe people are telling the truth, particularly those we know well.
Behavioral familiarity allows for detection of atypical behaviors, but behavioral control can mask deception.
Interpersonal Deception Theory
Highlights that deception is an interactive process, requiring adaptation in response to feedback from others as the interaction unfolds.
Conclusion
Deception, while often viewed negatively, can sometimes protect relationships and avoid conflicts.
Understanding relational transgressions, particularly jealousy and deception, is crucial for fostering healthier communication and relational dynamics.