Social Control Theories - Self-Control Theory Notes
Social Control Theories
Self-Control Theory Overview
Definition: A general theory of crime explaining individual differences in propensity to commit or abstain from certain behaviors.
Scope: Includes all crime and analogous behavior (e.g., drug use, risky sexual acts, etc.) across all ages and circumstances.
Key Concept: Criminal propensity is a reflection of an individual’s self-control.
Dynamic: Self-control serves as a barrier between individuals and the inherent benefits of crime.
Formula:
Decreased self-control does not directly lead to increased crime.
Instead, it’s an interaction between individual propensity and crime opportunities that determines crime or conformity.
Key Authors: Gottfredson & Hirschi (1990).
Sources of Self-Control
Socialization:
Effective socialization is critical for developing self-control.
Family Importance: The family plays the most significant role in shaping self-control.
Other Contributors: Schools and other social institutions offer additional support, but to a lesser extent.
Peering Effect: Peer influence is minimal; rather, the principle of homophily suggests similar peers are selected based on existing traits.
Child-Rearing:
Development requires adequate child-rearing practices.
High parental attachment and monitoring linked to higher socialization and better behavioral recognition.
Emphasis on rewarding good behavior and punishing bad behavior effectively.
Ineffective Child-Rearing and Self-Control
Contributing Factors:
Ineffective or incomplete socialization leads to lower self-control.
Poor parenting styles (e.g., erratic discipline) contribute to developing lower self-control in children.
Outcomes: Low self-control parents tend to raise low self-control children.
Fixed Levels: Levels of self-control are generally fixed by age 7.
Age Crime Curve: Attributed to changes in opportunity rather than criminal propensity.
Measurement Issues in Self-Control Theory
Behavioral vs. Attitudinal:
Debate over the best indicators for self-control, focusing on acts explained by self-control (e.g., reckless and delinquent acts).
Behavioral measures may suffer from tautology, as they can reinforce existing conclusions (e.g., assuming that criminals have lower self-control because they commit crimes).
Characteristics of Low Self-Control (Attitudinal)
Six key characteristics (Grasmick et al., 1993):
Impulsivity: Preference for immediate gratification, focus on 'here and now'.
Risk-Seeking: Engagement in risk for excitement and pleasure.
Simplicity: Enjoyment of straightforward tasks over complex challenges.
Physicality: Favor physical activities over cerebral or intellectual ones.
Self-Centeredness: Focused on personal needs often at the expense of others.
Anger: Quick temper, orientation towards aggression, and difficulty calming down.
Empirical Evidence and Context
Variability of Self-Control: Self-control fluctuates within individuals over time, rather than being a fixed trait.
Age Crime Curve: Provides insights not only into opportunity changes but also reflects variations in criminal propensity.
Influences from Other Theories: Integrate concepts from social learning theories and life-course criminology to understand the moderate impact of low self-control on delinquency.
Predictive Value: Self-control serves as an important predictor, accounting for approximately 19% of the variance in delinquent behavior; however, it is not the sole determinant of crime.
Upcoming Readings
For Tuesday (March 25th): Read Chapter 7 – Labeling & Reintegrative Shaming.