Social Control Theories - Self-Control Theory Notes

Social Control Theories

Self-Control Theory Overview

  • Definition: A general theory of crime explaining individual differences in propensity to commit or abstain from certain behaviors.

  • Scope: Includes all crime and analogous behavior (e.g., drug use, risky sexual acts, etc.) across all ages and circumstances.

  • Key Concept: Criminal propensity is a reflection of an individual’s self-control.

  • Dynamic: Self-control serves as a barrier between individuals and the inherent benefits of crime.

  • Formula:

  • Decreased self-control does not directly lead to increased crime.

  • Instead, it’s an interaction between individual propensity and crime opportunities that determines crime or conformity.

  • Key Authors: Gottfredson & Hirschi (1990).

Sources of Self-Control

  • Socialization:

  • Effective socialization is critical for developing self-control.

  • Family Importance: The family plays the most significant role in shaping self-control.

  • Other Contributors: Schools and other social institutions offer additional support, but to a lesser extent.

  • Peering Effect: Peer influence is minimal; rather, the principle of homophily suggests similar peers are selected based on existing traits.

  • Child-Rearing:

  • Development requires adequate child-rearing practices.

  • High parental attachment and monitoring linked to higher socialization and better behavioral recognition.

  • Emphasis on rewarding good behavior and punishing bad behavior effectively.

Ineffective Child-Rearing and Self-Control

  • Contributing Factors:

  • Ineffective or incomplete socialization leads to lower self-control.

  • Poor parenting styles (e.g., erratic discipline) contribute to developing lower self-control in children.

  • Outcomes: Low self-control parents tend to raise low self-control children.

  • Fixed Levels: Levels of self-control are generally fixed by age 7.

  • Age Crime Curve: Attributed to changes in opportunity rather than criminal propensity.

Measurement Issues in Self-Control Theory

  • Behavioral vs. Attitudinal:

  • Debate over the best indicators for self-control, focusing on acts explained by self-control (e.g., reckless and delinquent acts).

  • Behavioral measures may suffer from tautology, as they can reinforce existing conclusions (e.g., assuming that criminals have lower self-control because they commit crimes).

Characteristics of Low Self-Control (Attitudinal)

  • Six key characteristics (Grasmick et al., 1993):

  • Impulsivity: Preference for immediate gratification, focus on 'here and now'.

  • Risk-Seeking: Engagement in risk for excitement and pleasure.

  • Simplicity: Enjoyment of straightforward tasks over complex challenges.

  • Physicality: Favor physical activities over cerebral or intellectual ones.

  • Self-Centeredness: Focused on personal needs often at the expense of others.

  • Anger: Quick temper, orientation towards aggression, and difficulty calming down.

Empirical Evidence and Context

  • Variability of Self-Control: Self-control fluctuates within individuals over time, rather than being a fixed trait.

  • Age Crime Curve: Provides insights not only into opportunity changes but also reflects variations in criminal propensity.

  • Influences from Other Theories: Integrate concepts from social learning theories and life-course criminology to understand the moderate impact of low self-control on delinquency.

  • Predictive Value: Self-control serves as an important predictor, accounting for approximately 19% of the variance in delinquent behavior; however, it is not the sole determinant of crime.

Upcoming Readings

  • For Tuesday (March 25th): Read Chapter 7 – Labeling & Reintegrative Shaming.