Lecture 6
Lecture Title: Climate Change and Global Action
Presenter: Giorgio Ricchiuti
Affiliation: QMUL, October 29th, 2024
Key Topics:
Forward-looking government planning
International agreements and strategy coordination
The net-zero race
Focus on EU strategies
Global Actions: Triggers for global action and barriers
Vulnerability
EU Government responses to disasters
Definition and purpose of forward-looking government planning in addressing climate change.
Command and Control Regulation: Specific technologies and performance standards (e.g., emissions limits).
Market-based Instruments: Use price incentives (e.g., taxes, subsidies, cap-and-trade systems).
Information-based Policies: Mandatory disclosure and labeling (e.g., energy certification).
Public Spending/Lending: Government investment and support through development banks.
UNFCCC: Established in 1992; aims to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations.
COP Conferences:
Kyoto Protocol (COP3, 1997)
Copenhagen Conference (COP15, 2009)
Paris Agreement (COP21, 2015)
Sharm el-Sheikh (COP27, 2022)
Limit global temperature rise to below 2°C, and pursue efforts for 1.5°C.
Enhance adaptation to climate change impacts and promote resilience.
Align finance to facilitate low GHG development pathways.
Decentralized Approach: Countries set their own NDCs without a global agreement.
Assessment: Every five years via Global Stocktake.
Current objectives:
EU: Reduce GHG emissions by 55% by 2030.
China: -65% CO2/GDP by 2030.
India: -45% emission intensity by 2030.
US: -50/52% GHG emissions by 2030.
Concept: Achieving a balance between emissions and sequestration.
Growth of Net-Zero Targets: Numerous pledges made by countries, regions, and corporations.
Current NDCs are insufficient to bridge the gap between actual emissions and targets needed for climate goals.
European Green Deal: A comprehensive strategy launched in 2019.
Climate Neutrality: Commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050.
Legally Binding Targets: 55% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030.
Covers 27 EU states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
Compliance by approximately 10,000 stationary installations.
Emission Coverage: CO2 from various sectors, including energy and aviation.
Participation History: Three phases from 2005 to present, currently in the 2021-2030 phase.
Cap-and-Trade: Review of annual cap and reduction targets.
Minimum 50% of carbon revenues directed towards climate and energy-related initiatives.
Programs such as Innovation Fund and Modernisation Fund to support low-carbon technologies.
Fluctuation of EU allowance prices impacting market behavior and compliance rates.
Reform Strategies:
Increase reduction factor.
Include maritime sector in scope.
Implement Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
Importance of implementing climate change mitigation policies.
Multiple options available for governments to engage effectively in climate action.
Introduction to global responses to climate change challenges.
Signatures of Climate Deals: Analysis of participation across regions in climate agreements.
Explore the effects of political economy on low carbon transition and conditions for sustained action.
Factors affecting preferences include emissions growth, participation rates, and specific national characteristics.
Identifies vulnerability, GDP per capita, fossil fuel rents, and political institutions as influential factors.
Creation of a preferences index; its correlation with climate actions.
Variability of climate action preferences across different contexts.
Simulated model results vs actual participation and emission levels.
Analysis of the relationship between estimated parameters of participation and emissions.
The impact of peer pressure on countries' climate action responses.
Outcomes based on the interplay between peer pressure, bias against action, and heterogeneity.
Understanding vulnerability and its implications for climate action.
Vulnerability stems from exposure to climate hazards and adaptive capacity differences across nations.
Investigate the relationship between vulnerability and climate actions.
Comparison of vulnerability indices across signatories and non-signatories of climate accords.
Examination of the link between vulnerability and legislation aimed at mitigation.
Overview of average GHG growth rates in relation to vulnerability indices.
Analysis of GHG growth per income group and vulnerability correlation.
Evidence indicates that increased vulnerability is associated with diminished climate action efforts.
Overview of governmental responses in the face of climate disasters.
Increased frequency and intensity of climate disasters as potential motivators for action.
Unexpected climate disasters impact public concerns but lack evidence for increased mitigation laws.
Examining Hurricane Sandy's impact on climate change legislation and public perception.
Study of disaster shocks and their effects on climate legislation across 17 Western European countries.
Differentiation between mitigation (emissions reduction) and adaptation (behavioral changes).
Discussion of resource constraints impacting legislative focus post-disaster.
Establishes a theoretical basis for understanding the relationship between disasters and legislation.
Details of data sources regarding climate disasters and corresponding laws.
Identifying years of significant disaster shocks and their analysis.
Summary of disaster occurrences between 1980 and 2020.
Specific examples and statistics indicating the years and countries of extreme disaster occurrences.
Further statistics confirming disaster occurrences above specific statistical deviations.
Continuation of analysis regarding extraordinary disaster frequency.
Justification for studying Western Europe based on the region's policy history and socioeconomic factors.
Explanation of the difference-in-differences methodology applied in the study.
Visual representation of the impact of climate disaster shocks on cumulative legislation.
Visual outcomes indicating the increase in adaptation laws after climate disaster shocks.
Findings suggest disaster shocks negatively influence mitigation law enactment but increase adaptation law measures.
Thank you for participation. For more information, contact via provided email.
Lecture Title: Climate Change and Global Action
Presenter: Giorgio Ricchiuti
Affiliation: QMUL, October 29th, 2024
Key Topics:
Forward-looking government planning
International agreements and strategy coordination
The net-zero race
Focus on EU strategies
Global Actions: Triggers for global action and barriers
Vulnerability
EU Government responses to disasters
Definition and purpose of forward-looking government planning in addressing climate change.
Command and Control Regulation: Specific technologies and performance standards (e.g., emissions limits).
Market-based Instruments: Use price incentives (e.g., taxes, subsidies, cap-and-trade systems).
Information-based Policies: Mandatory disclosure and labeling (e.g., energy certification).
Public Spending/Lending: Government investment and support through development banks.
UNFCCC: Established in 1992; aims to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations.
COP Conferences:
Kyoto Protocol (COP3, 1997)
Copenhagen Conference (COP15, 2009)
Paris Agreement (COP21, 2015)
Sharm el-Sheikh (COP27, 2022)
Limit global temperature rise to below 2°C, and pursue efforts for 1.5°C.
Enhance adaptation to climate change impacts and promote resilience.
Align finance to facilitate low GHG development pathways.
Decentralized Approach: Countries set their own NDCs without a global agreement.
Assessment: Every five years via Global Stocktake.
Current objectives:
EU: Reduce GHG emissions by 55% by 2030.
China: -65% CO2/GDP by 2030.
India: -45% emission intensity by 2030.
US: -50/52% GHG emissions by 2030.
Concept: Achieving a balance between emissions and sequestration.
Growth of Net-Zero Targets: Numerous pledges made by countries, regions, and corporations.
Current NDCs are insufficient to bridge the gap between actual emissions and targets needed for climate goals.
European Green Deal: A comprehensive strategy launched in 2019.
Climate Neutrality: Commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050.
Legally Binding Targets: 55% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030.
Covers 27 EU states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
Compliance by approximately 10,000 stationary installations.
Emission Coverage: CO2 from various sectors, including energy and aviation.
Participation History: Three phases from 2005 to present, currently in the 2021-2030 phase.
Cap-and-Trade: Review of annual cap and reduction targets.
Minimum 50% of carbon revenues directed towards climate and energy-related initiatives.
Programs such as Innovation Fund and Modernisation Fund to support low-carbon technologies.
Fluctuation of EU allowance prices impacting market behavior and compliance rates.
Reform Strategies:
Increase reduction factor.
Include maritime sector in scope.
Implement Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).
Importance of implementing climate change mitigation policies.
Multiple options available for governments to engage effectively in climate action.
Introduction to global responses to climate change challenges.
Signatures of Climate Deals: Analysis of participation across regions in climate agreements.
Explore the effects of political economy on low carbon transition and conditions for sustained action.
Factors affecting preferences include emissions growth, participation rates, and specific national characteristics.
Identifies vulnerability, GDP per capita, fossil fuel rents, and political institutions as influential factors.
Creation of a preferences index; its correlation with climate actions.
Variability of climate action preferences across different contexts.
Simulated model results vs actual participation and emission levels.
Analysis of the relationship between estimated parameters of participation and emissions.
The impact of peer pressure on countries' climate action responses.
Outcomes based on the interplay between peer pressure, bias against action, and heterogeneity.
Understanding vulnerability and its implications for climate action.
Vulnerability stems from exposure to climate hazards and adaptive capacity differences across nations.
Investigate the relationship between vulnerability and climate actions.
Comparison of vulnerability indices across signatories and non-signatories of climate accords.
Examination of the link between vulnerability and legislation aimed at mitigation.
Overview of average GHG growth rates in relation to vulnerability indices.
Analysis of GHG growth per income group and vulnerability correlation.
Evidence indicates that increased vulnerability is associated with diminished climate action efforts.
Overview of governmental responses in the face of climate disasters.
Increased frequency and intensity of climate disasters as potential motivators for action.
Unexpected climate disasters impact public concerns but lack evidence for increased mitigation laws.
Examining Hurricane Sandy's impact on climate change legislation and public perception.
Study of disaster shocks and their effects on climate legislation across 17 Western European countries.
Differentiation between mitigation (emissions reduction) and adaptation (behavioral changes).
Discussion of resource constraints impacting legislative focus post-disaster.
Establishes a theoretical basis for understanding the relationship between disasters and legislation.
Details of data sources regarding climate disasters and corresponding laws.
Identifying years of significant disaster shocks and their analysis.
Summary of disaster occurrences between 1980 and 2020.
Specific examples and statistics indicating the years and countries of extreme disaster occurrences.
Further statistics confirming disaster occurrences above specific statistical deviations.
Continuation of analysis regarding extraordinary disaster frequency.
Justification for studying Western Europe based on the region's policy history and socioeconomic factors.
Explanation of the difference-in-differences methodology applied in the study.
Visual representation of the impact of climate disaster shocks on cumulative legislation.
Visual outcomes indicating the increase in adaptation laws after climate disaster shocks.
Findings suggest disaster shocks negatively influence mitigation law enactment but increase adaptation law measures.
Thank you for participation. For more information, contact via provided email.