Kennedy to Carter: US Foreign Policy in Latin America 1961-1981 (copy for austin)

Chapter 7: From Kennedy to Carter: US Foreign Policy in Latin America (1961-1981)

Detailed notes focusing on US relations and foreign policy in Latin America during the Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Carter administrations.

Overview of U.S. Foreign Policy in Latin America

  • Key Questions:

    • How successful were Kennedy's Latin American policies?

    • What implications did Johnson's policies have?

    • Was the USA losing control of the Western hemisphere in the mid-1970s?

    • What were the implications of Carter's policies for Latin America?

President Kennedy and Latin America

Success of Kennedy's Policies
  • 1960 Election: Kennedy versus Nixon; Kennedy criticized Eisenhower's Cold War strategies.

  • Inaugural Address: Promised vigorous Cold War efforts to support liberty worldwide.

  • Focus on the Third World: Initiatives aimed at modernizing and democratizing Latin America's developing economies.

Alliance for Progress
  • November 1961 Announcement: $20 billion promise for social change in Latin America.

  • Goals: Increased housing, jobs, healthcare, schools, land reform, tax reform, and strong democratic governments.

  • Latin American Participation: All countries except Cuba participated.

Achievements of the Alliance
  • Concrete Successes:

    • Housing programs in Peru and Brazil.

    • In Chile, President Alessandri embraced the Alliance, improving education and housing.

Mixed Results
  • Colombia: New schools were built, but economic troubles persisted, leading to increased dependence on the USA.

  • Criticism: Projects were viewed as arrogant; resentment grew towards perceived US imperialism.

Failures of the Alliance
  • Shortcomings:

    • By 1963, economic outcomes were modest; economic inequality persisted.

    • Many Latin American nations lacked political stability, resulting in military coups.

  • Bureaucratic Challenges: Conflicts within U.S. administration hindered the effectiveness of the Alliance.

  • Corruption: Elites mismanaged or diverted aid; land redistributions faced opposition from wealthy landowners.

Impact of Kennedy's Policies

Key Events
  • Cuban Affair:

    • Initial support for Castro turned to opposition.

    • Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961): Failed CIA plan to oust Castro increased tensions with Cuba and enhanced Castro's position.

    • Cuban Missiles Crisis (1962): Heightened Cold War pressures prompted direct confrontation with the USSR but ultimately forced negotiation and established hotline communication.

President Johnson's Policies

Implications Following Kennedy
  • Focus on Stability: Under Johnson, emphasis shifted away from the Alliance for Progress towards maintaining political stability and supporting military regimes.

  • Dominican Republic Invasion (1965): Justified under the Johnson Doctrine to prevent another Cuba.

    • Critics viewed intervention as an infringement on national sovereignty and a failure of the OAS.

Nixon and Loss of Control in the Western Hemisphere

Change in Strategy
  • Rockefeller Report: suggested the USA needed more tolerance for authoritarian regimes in Latin America.

  • Opposition to Allende in Chile: Nixon aimed to undermine Salvador Allende's elected government to prevent a Marxist regime.

    • Supported economic disruption through CIA operations, leading to Allende's overthrow in 1973.

President Carter's Policies

New Directions in Foreign Policy
  • Human Rights Focus: Championing of human rights during Carter’s presidency led to criticism of authoritarian regimes being supported for strategic reasons.

  • Panama Canal Treaties: Sought to return control to Panama, overcoming initial resistance in Congress.

  • Support for the Sandinistas: Reluctant support after Somoza’s overthrow; conflicted by fears they would align too closely with Cuba.

Mixed Outcomes
  • Carter’s engagement: Sought to position the US as a partner in human rights but faced contradictions in supporting authoritarian regimes for stability.

  • Resistance to Policy: Encountered backlash at home and complex geopolitical realities that complicated his idealistic approach.