4.4 Top Down and Bottom Up Processing
Gestalt Principles and Processing Types
Overview of Processing Types
Top Down Processing:
Definition: Utilizes prior knowledge, experiences, and expectations to interpret sensory information.
Process: Perception influenced by expectations and beliefs, helping the brain to form a coherent understanding based on context and previous experiences.
Example:
Visual Example: Presenting an image where the viewer is directed to look at the letter "A" first.
Result: The viewer is primed to interpret the following ambiguous item as "b" to continue the sequence of letters (A, B, C).
Bottom Up Processing:
Definition: Involves building up a perception from individual sensory features without prior knowledge.
Process: Interpretation starts from the small details and works upwards to formulate a complete picture.
Example:
Visual Example: A complex image that the viewer has not encountered before, requiring scrutiny of its features.
Result: After a period of observation, the viewer may interpret the image as either a rat or an old man's face, forming different perceptions based on the elements visible (ear, eye, abbreviation of facial features).
Real-World Application of Processing Types
Driving Familiarity:
Top Down Processing in Familiar Environments:
When driving in a familiar area, signs and signals can be quickly interpreted using learned expectations about their meanings.
Example: Readily understanding traffic signs based on previous experiences.
Bottom Up Processing in New Environments:
In an unfamiliar country, driver must analyze each sign individually to understand their meanings, relying on visible icons/pictures.
Example: Approaching and deciphering road signs without pre-existing knowledge of their meanings.
Influence of Information on Perception
Image Interpretation Example:
Initial State: Introducing a sparse, unclear image where viewers initially do not understand the content.
Transitioning from Bottom Up to Top Down Processing:
Allow viewers to observe the ambiguous image, initially causing confusion due to lack of prior knowledge.
After providing additional contextual information or expectations, viewers might have an easier time perceiving the intended content.
Result: The inclusion of expectations from previous guidance leads to clearer discernments, e.g., recognizing features like a horse's nose, cowboy hat, and face elements that weren't as apparent initially.