Unit 2: Probability, Random Variables, and Probability Distributions Study Guide

Discrete Random Variables & Probability Distributions

  • Discrete Random Variable Definition: A discrete random variable XX takes on a countable set of distinct numerical values, where each value is associated with a specific probability P(X=x)P(X = x).

  • Fundamental Properties of Discrete Probability Distributions:

    • Non-Negativity Constraint: Every individual probability must lie between 0 and 1 inclusive:     0≤P(X=x)≤10 \le P(X = x) \le 1

    • Summation Constraint: The sum of probabilities across all possible outcomes in the sample space must equal exactly 1:     ∑P(X=x)=1\sum P(X = x) = 1

  • Weighted Die Problem:

    • Distribution Table:     

      Weighted Die Probability Table

               | Value | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |     | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |     | Probability | 0.100.10 | 0.150.15 | 0.200.20 | 0.250.25 | 0.200.20 | 0.100.10 |

    • Calculating Probability of Die Sum equal to 10:     When two independent weighted dice are thrown, the event that the sum of the two face values equals 10 can occur through three mutually exclusive outcome pairs: (4,6)(4, 6), (6,4)(6, 4), and (5,5)(5, 5).

    • P(4 then 6)=P(4)×P(6)=(0.25)(0.10)P(4 \text{ then } 6) = P(4) \times P(6) = (0.25)(0.10)

    • P(6 then 4)=P(6)×P(4)=(0.10)(0.25)P(6 \text{ then } 4) = P(6) \times P(4) = (0.10)(0.25)

    • P(5 then 5)=P(5)×P(5)=(0.20)(0.20)=(0.20)2P(5 \text{ then } 5) = P(5) \times P(5) = (0.20)(0.20) = (0.20)^2

    • Total probability formula:       P(sum=10)=2(0.25)(0.10)+(0.20)2=0.050+0.040=0.090P(\text{sum} = 10) = 2(0.25)(0.10) + (0.20)^2 = 0.050 + 0.040 = 0.090

  • Cookie Decorating Experiment:

    • Distribution Table:     

      Cookie Decorating Discrete Distribution

               | XX | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |     | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |     | P(X)P(X) | 0.20.2 | 0.40.4 | 0.30.3 | 0.10.1 |

    • Probability of Decorating At Least 3 Cookies:     P(X≥3)=P(X=3)+P(X=4)=0.3+0.1=0.4P(X \ge 3) = P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) = 0.3 + 0.1 = 0.4

    • Mean / Expected Value Calculation (μX\mu_X):     μX=E(X)=∑x⋅P(X=x)\mu_X = E(X) = \sum x \cdot P(X = x)     μX=(1)(0.2)+(2)(0.4)+(3)(0.3)+(4)(0.1)=0.2+0.8+0.9+0.4=2.3 cookies\mu_X = (1)(0.2) + (2)(0.4) + (3)(0.3) + (4)(0.1) = 0.2 + 0.8 + 0.9 + 0.4 = 2.3\,\text{cookies}

    • Interpretation of Standard Deviation (σX\sigma_X):     In repeated trials, the number of cookies decorated by participants will typically differ from the mean number of cookies (2.3 cookies2.3\,\text{cookies}) by approximately one standard deviation.

  • Two-Dice Sum Probability Distribution Function:

    • Function Definition: P(X)=6−∣X−7∣36P(X) = \frac{6 - |X - 7|}{36} for X∈{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12}X \in \{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12\}.

    • Distribution Table:     

      Sum of Two Dice Distribution Table

               | XX | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |     | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |     | P(X)P(X) | 136\frac{1}{36} | 236\frac{2}{36} | 336\frac{3}{36} | 436\frac{4}{36} | 536\frac{5}{36} | 636\frac{6}{36} | 536\frac{5}{36} | 436\frac{4}{36} | 336\frac{3}{36} | 236\frac{2}{36} | 136\frac{1}{36} |

    • Verification as a True Probability Function:

    • Every probability value P(X)P(X) is non-negative and bounded by 1 (0≤P(X)≤10 \le P(X) \le 1).

    • Sum of all probabilities across the sample space:       ∑X=212P(X)=1+2+3+4+5+6+5+4+3+2+136=3636=1.00\sum_{X=2}^{12} P(X) = \frac{1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1}{36} = \frac{36}{36} = 1.00

    • Physical Modeling Context: This probability function models the sum of the outcomes when rolling two fair, standard six-sided dice.

    • Calculating P(X \ge 9)$format:**\n    P(X \ge 9) = P(9) + P(10) + P(11) + P(12) = \frac{4}{36} + \frac{3}{36} + \frac{2}{36} + \frac{1}{36} = \frac{10}{36} = \frac{5}{18} \approx 0.2778\n * **Determining Expected Value E(X) via Symmetry:**\n * E(X) = 7\n * **Symmetry Justification:** The probability distribution is perfectly symmetric around X = 7.Foranydiscreterandomvariablewhosedistributionissymmetrical,themean/expectedvalue. For any discrete random variable whose distribution is symmetrical, the mean / expected valueE(X) is located at the center of symmetry without requiring explicit calculation.\n\n# Binomial Distributions\n\n* **Binomial Criteria Framework (BINS):**\n * **B - Binary Outcomes:** Each individual trial results in one of exactly two outcomes: a "Success" or a "Failure".\n * **I - Independent Trials:** The outcome of any given trial does not affect or alter the outcome of any other trial.\n * **N - Number Fixed:** There is a predetermined, fixed number of trials n.\n * **S - Same Probability:** The probability of success p remains constant across all trials.\n\n* **Standard Mathematical Formulas for Binomial Random Variable X \sim \text{Bin}(n, p)$format:

    • Probability Mass Function (PMF):     P(X=k)=(nk)pk(1−p)n−kP(X = k) = \binom{n}{k} p^k (1 - p)^{n - k}

    • Mean / Expected Value:     μ=n×p\mu = n \times p

    • Variance:     σ2=n×p×(1−p)\sigma^2 = n \times p \times (1 - p)

    • Standard Deviation:     σ=n×p×(1−p)\sigma = \sqrt{n \times p \times (1 - p)}

  • SAT Multiple Choice Random Guessing Application:

    • Parameters: n=25n = 25 questions, probability of correct guessing on a 5-option question p=15=0.20p = \frac{1}{5} = 0.20.

    • Probability of answering 6 or more questions correctly (P(X \ge 6)$format):\n    P(X \ge 6) = 1 - P(X \le 5) = 1 - \text{binomcdf}(25, 0.20, 5)\n    P(X \le 5) = \text{binomcdf}(25, 0.20, 5) \approx 0.6167\n    P(X \ge 6) = 1 - 0.6167 = 0.3833\n\n* **Clemson University Freshmen Graduation Case Study:**\n * Parameters: Sample size n = 16freshmenlivingonadormfloor,baseline4−yeargraduationratefreshmen living on a dorm floor, baseline 4-year graduation ratep = 0.63.\n * Figure showing handwritten solutions:\n    ![Clemson Freshmen Graduation Calculations](https://assets.knowt.com/pdf-flow-prod/948295bc-a9fa-4bbe-ba6d-e505d15c83d0-figures/5.png)\n\n * **Verification of Binomial Settings (BINS):**\n * **Binary:** Each freshman either graduates in 4 years (Success) or does not graduate in 4 years (Failure).\n * **Independent:** The graduation outcome of one freshman is independent of the graduation outcome of another freshman on the floor.\n * **Number Fixed:** There is a fixed sample size of n = 16 freshmen.\n * **Same Probability:** Each freshman has an identical probability p = 0.63 of graduating in 4 years.\n * **Probability Exactly Half Graduate (X = 8):**\n    P(X = 8) = \text{binompdf}(16, 0.63, 8) \approx 0.1118\,\text{(or } 11.18\% \text{)}\n * **Probability More Than 10 Freshmen Graduate (P(X > 10)$format):**     P(X>10)=P(X≥11)=1−binomcdf(16,0.63,10)=1−0.5770=0.4230 (or 42.30%)P(X > 10) = P(X \ge 11) = 1 - \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 10) = 1 - 0.5770 = 0.4230\,\text{(or } 42.30\% \text{)}

    • Probability Less Than 5 Freshmen Graduate (P(X < 5)$format):**\n    P(X < 5) = P(X \le 4) = \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 4) = 0.0023\,\text{(or } 0.23\% \text{)}\n * **Probability At Least 6 Freshmen Graduate (P(X \ge 6)$format):     P(X≥6)=1−P(X≤5)=1−binomcdf(16,0.63,5)=1−0.0100=0.9900 (or 99.00%)P(X \ge 6) = 1 - P(X \le 5) = 1 - \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 5) = 1 - 0.0100 = 0.9900\,\text{(or } 99.00\% \text{)}

    • Probability At Most 7 Freshmen Graduate (P(X \le 7)$format):**\n    P(X \le 7) = \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 7) = 0.0926\,\text{(or } 9.26\% \text{)}\n * **Expected Number of Freshmen to Graduate (\mu):**\n    \mu = n \times p = 16 \times 0.63 = 10.08\n * **Interpretation:** Over time, an average of 10.08 freshmen on a dorm floor of 16 are expected to graduate in 4 years.\n * **Standard Deviation Calculation (\sigma) and Interpretation:**\n    \sigma = \sqrt{n \times p \times (1 - p)} = \sqrt{16 \times 0.63 \times 0.37} = \sqrt{3.7296} \approx 1.93\n * **Interpretation:** In repeated random selections of 16 freshmen, the number of freshmen who graduate in 4 years will typically vary from the expected mean (10.08)byapproximately) by approximately1.93 students.\n\n# Expected Value & Decision Analysis\n\n* **Carnival Coin Selection Game Analysis:**\n * **Game Rules:** A blindfolded player selects one coin at random from a container containing 60 total coins. Game entry costs \$0.25, and the player keeps the drawn coin.\n * **Coin Composition & Individual Probabilities:**\n * Pennies (\$0.01):9coins,): 9 coins,P = \frac{9}{60}\n * Nickels (\$0.05):8coins,): 8 coins,P = \frac{8}{60}\n * Dimes (\$0.10):12coins,): 12 coins,P = \frac{12}{60}\n * Quarters (\$0.25):16coins,): 16 coins,P = \frac{16}{60}\n * Half-Dollars (\$0.50):11coins,): 11 coins,P = \frac{11}{60}\n * Dollar pieces (\$1.00):4coins,): 4 coins,P = \frac{4}{60}\n * Total Coins: 9 + 8 + 12 + 16 + 11 + 4 = 60\,\text{coins}\n * **Expected Value Computation (E(V)):**\n    E(V) = (0.01)\left(\frac{9}{60}\right) + (0.05)\left(\frac{8}{60}\right) + (0.10)\left(\frac{12}{60}\right) + (0.25)\left(\frac{16}{60}\right) + (0.50)\left(\frac{11}{60}\right) + (1.00)\left(\frac{4}{60}\right)\n    E(V) = \frac{0.09 + 0.40 + 1.20 + 4.00 + 5.50 + 4.00}{60} = \frac{15.19}{60} \approx \$0.2532\n * **Financial Decision Conclusion:**\n * Expected Net Gain per Play: E(V) - \text{Cost} = \$0.2532 - \$0.2500 = +\$0.0032\n * Decision: A player should expect to gain money in the long run because the expected value of the coin selected (\$0.2532)isgreaterthanthe) is greater than the\$0.25 cost to play.\n\n# Continuous Random Variables & Standard Normal Distributions\n\n* **Standard Normal Distribution Variable Z \sim N(0, 1)$format:

    • Probability Comparison & Ordering:

    • Event I: P(Z<1.3)≈0.9032P(Z < 1.3) \approx 0.9032

    • Event II: P(−1.2<Z<1.2)=P(Z<1.2)−P(Z<−1.2)≈0.8849−0.1151=0.7698P(-1.2 < Z < 1.2) = P(Z < 1.2) - P(Z < -1.2) \approx 0.8849 - 0.1151 = 0.7698

    • Event III: P(Z>−1)=P(Z<1)≈0.8413P(Z > -1) = P(Z < 1) \approx 0.8413

    • Ordered from smallest to largest probability: II (0.76980.7698), III (0.84130.8413), I (0.90320.9032).

  • Tennis Serve Speed Percentile Evaluation:

    • Distribution: Serve speeds X∼N(μ=115 mph,σ=8 mph)X \sim N(\mu = 115\,\text{mph}, \sigma = 8\,\text{mph}).

    • Target observation: Taylor Fritz serve speed X=127 mphX = 127\,\text{mph}.

    • Standardized ZZ-score calculation:     Z=X−μσ=127−1158=128=1.50Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} = \frac{127 - 115}{8} = \frac{12}{8} = 1.50

    • Percentile derivation:     P(Z<1.50)≈0.9332  ⟹  93rd percentileP(Z < 1.50) \approx 0.9332 \implies 93\text{rd percentile}

  • Adult Male Cholesterol Level Parameter Derivation:

    • Distribution: Cholesterol levels X∼N(μ,σ=17 mg/dL)X \sim N(\mu, \sigma = 17\,\text{mg/dL}).

    • High cholesterol threshold condition: X>200 mg/dLX > 200\,\text{mg/dL}.

    • Given high cholesterol proportion: P(X>200)=0.08  ⟹  P(X≤200)=0.92P(X > 200) = 0.08 \implies P(X \le 200) = 0.92

    • Standard score for the 92nd percentile:     Z=invNorm(0.92,0,1)≈1.4051Z = \text{invNorm}(0.92, 0, 1) \approx 1.4051

    • Solving for mean cholesterol level μ\mu:     Z=X−μσ  ⟹  1.4051=200−μ17Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} \implies 1.4051 = \frac{200 - \mu}{17}     200−μ=1.4051×17=23.8867200 - \mu = 1.4051 \times 17 = 23.8867     μ=200−23.8867=176.1133≈176.1 mg/dL\mu = 200 - 23.8867 = 176.1133 \approx 176.1\,\text{mg/dL}

  • High School Daily Phone Screen Time Study:

    • Distribution: Screen time X∼N(μ=325 minutes,σ=25 minutes)X \sim N(\mu = 325\,\text{minutes}, \sigma = 25\,\text{minutes}).

    • Proportion Spending Longer Than 370 Minutes (P(X > 370)$format):**\n    Z = \frac{370 - 325}{25} = \frac{45}{25} = 1.80\n    P(X > 370) = P(Z > 1.80) = 1 - P(Z \le 1.80) = 1 - 0.9641 = 0.0359\,\text{(or } 3.59\% \text{)}\n * **Probability Spending Between 300 and 400 Minutes (P(300 < X < 400)$format):     Z1=300−32525=−1.00Z_1 = \frac{300 - 325}{25} = -1.00     Z2=400−32525=3.00Z_2 = \frac{400 - 325}{25} = 3.00     P(300<X<400)=P(−1.00<Z<3.00)=P(Z<3.00)−P(Z<−1.00)=0.9987−0.1587=0.8400 (or 84.00%)P(300 < X < 400) = P(-1.00 < Z < 3.00) = P(Z < 3.00) - P(Z < -1.00) = 0.9987 - 0.1587 = 0.8400\,\text{(or } 84.00\% \text{)}

    • Minimum Screen Time Cutoff for the Top 12% of Students:     P(X>x)=0.12  ⟹  P(X≤x)=0.88P(X > x) = 0.12 \implies P(X \le x) = 0.88     Z=invNorm(0.88,0,1)≈1.1750Z = \text{invNorm}(0.88, 0, 1) \approx 1.1750     x=μ+Zσ=325+(1.1750×25)=325+29.375=354.375 minutesx = \mu + Z \sigma = 325 + (1.1750 \times 25) = 325 + 29.375 = 354.375\,\text{minutes}

Sampling Distributions & Central Limit Theorem

  • Disney World Space Mountain Wait Time Comparison:

    • Individual wait time X∼N(μ=50 minutes,σ=4 minutes)X \sim N(\mu = 50\,\text{minutes}, \sigma = 4\,\text{minutes}).

    • Sample size n=16n = 16 riders, with sample mean wait time xˉ\bar{x}.

    • Sampling distribution parameters:     μxˉ=μ=50 minutes\mu_{\bar{x}} = \mu = 50\,\text{minutes}     σxˉ=σn=416=44=1 minute\sigma_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} = \frac{4}{\sqrt{16}} = \frac{4}{4} = 1\,\text{minute}

    • Probability evaluation for wait times under 46 minutes:

    • Individual rider (P(X < 46)$format):\n      Z = \frac{46 - 50}{4} = -1.00 \implies P(Z < -1.00) \approx 0.1587\n * Sample mean of 16 riders (P(\bar{x} < 46)$format):       Z=46−501=−4.00  ⟹  P(Z<−4.00)≈0.00003Z = \frac{46 - 50}{1} = -4.00 \implies P(Z < -4.00) \approx 0.00003

    • Conclusion: P(X<46)P(X < 46) is larger than P(xˉ<46)P(\bar{x} < 46) because the sampling distribution of xˉ\bar{x} has a smaller standard deviation (σxˉ=1 minute\sigma_{\bar{x}} = 1\,\text{minute}) than the individual wait time distribution XX (σ=4 minutes\sigma = 4\,\text{minutes}).

  • Central Limit Theorem (CLT) Population Normality Requirements:

    • The population distribution does NOT need to be normally distributed for the sampling distribution of xˉ\bar{x} to be approximately normal.

    • Central Limit Theorem Core Principle: When the sample size nn is sufficiently large (n≥30n \ge 30), the sampling distribution of the sample mean xˉ\bar{x} will be approximately normal regardless of the shape of the underlying population distribution.

  • Bluffton High School Teacher Email Analysis:

    • Individual teacher daily email output X∼N(μ=12 emails,σ=2.45 emails)X \sim N(\mu = 12\,\text{emails}, \sigma = 2.45\,\text{emails}).

    • Random sample size n=50n = 50 teachers.

    • Sampling Distribution Mean (\mu_{\bar{x}}$format):**\n    \mu_{\bar{x}} = \mu = 12\,\text{emails}\n * **Justification:** The sample mean \bar{x}isanunbiasedestimatorofthepopulationmeanis an unbiased estimator of the population mean\mu.\n * **Sampling Distribution Standard Deviation (\sigma_{\bar{x}}$format) & Condition Checking:     σxˉ=σn=2.4550≈0.3465 emails\sigma_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}} = \frac{2.45}{\sqrt{50}} \approx 0.3465\,\text{emails}

    • Condition to Check: The 10% Condition (Independence Condition). The total population size NN must be at least 10 times larger than the sample size (N≥10n=10×50=500N \ge 10n = 10 \times 50 = 500). There must be at least 500 teachers in the population (or sampling performed with replacement) to ensure individual teacher observations are independent.

    • Probability One Selected Teacher Sends Between 9 and 11 Emails (P(9 < X < 11)$format):**\n    Z_1 = \frac{9 - 12}{2.45} \approx -1.2245\n    Z_2 = \frac{11 - 12}{2.45} \approx -0.4082\n    P(9 < X < 11) = \text{normalcdf}(9, 11, 12, 2.45) \approx 0.2309\,\text{(or } 23.09\% \text{)}\n * **Probability Sample Mean of 50 Teachers is Between 9 and 11 Emails (P(9 < \bar{x} < 11)$format):     Z1=9−120.3465≈−8.66Z_1 = \frac{9 - 12}{0.3465} \approx -8.66     Z2=11−120.3465≈−2.89Z_2 = \frac{11 - 12}{0.3465} \approx -2.89     P(9<xˉ<11)=normalcdf(9,11,12,0.3465)≈0.0019 (or 0.19%)P(9 < \bar{x} < 11) = \text{normalcdf}(9, 11, 12, 0.3465) \approx 0.0019\,\text{(or } 0.19\% \text{)}

    • Comparative Likelihood Analysis:

    • Selecting one teacher who sends between 9 and 11 emails (23.09%23.09\%) is significantly more likely than finding a sample average of 50 teachers between 9 and 11 emails (0.19%0.19\%).

    • Reasoning: Individual data values exhibit far greater variability than sample averages. Increasing the sample size shrinks the standard deviation of the sample mean (σxˉ=σn\sigma_{\bar{x}} = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}), tightly packing the distribution of xˉ\bar{x} around the mean μ=12\mu = 12. Because the interval (9,11)(9, 11) excludes the mean of 12, the probability of the sample average falling in that interval approaches zero.

    • Impact of Increasing Sample Size to n=75n = 75:

    • When sample size increases to n=75n = 75, standard deviation decreases to σxˉ=2.4575≈0.2829 emails\sigma_{\bar{x}} = \frac{2.45}{\sqrt{75}} \approx 0.2829\,\text{emails}.

    • As σxˉ\sigma_{\bar{x}} decreases, the sampling distribution concentrates even more tightly around μ=12\mu = 12. Consequently, the probability P(9<xˉ<11)P(9 < \bar{x} < 11) decreases even further toward 0.