Unit 2: Probability, Random Variables, and Probability Distributions Study Guide
Discrete Random Variables & Probability Distributions
Discrete Random Variable Definition: A discrete random variable takes on a countable set of distinct numerical values, where each value is associated with a specific probability .
Fundamental Properties of Discrete Probability Distributions:
Non-Negativity Constraint: Every individual probability must lie between 0 and 1 inclusive:
Summation Constraint: The sum of probabilities across all possible outcomes in the sample space must equal exactly 1:
Weighted Die Problem:
Distribution Table:

| Value | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Probability | | | | | | |
Calculating Probability of Die Sum equal to 10: When two independent weighted dice are thrown, the event that the sum of the two face values equals 10 can occur through three mutually exclusive outcome pairs: , , and .
Total probability formula:
Cookie Decorating Experiment:
Distribution Table:

| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | | | | |
Probability of Decorating At Least 3 Cookies:
Mean / Expected Value Calculation ():
Interpretation of Standard Deviation (): In repeated trials, the number of cookies decorated by participants will typically differ from the mean number of cookies () by approximately one standard deviation.
Two-Dice Sum Probability Distribution Function:
Function Definition: for .
Distribution Table:

| | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Verification as a True Probability Function:
Every probability value is non-negative and bounded by 1 ().
Sum of all probabilities across the sample space:
Physical Modeling Context: This probability function models the sum of the outcomes when rolling two fair, standard six-sided dice.
Calculating P(X \ge 9)$format:**\n P(X \ge 9) = P(9) + P(10) + P(11) + P(12) = \frac{4}{36} + \frac{3}{36} + \frac{2}{36} + \frac{1}{36} = \frac{10}{36} = \frac{5}{18} \approx 0.2778\n * **Determining Expected Value E(X) via Symmetry:**\n * E(X) = 7\n * **Symmetry Justification:** The probability distribution is perfectly symmetric around X = 7E(X) is located at the center of symmetry without requiring explicit calculation.\n\n# Binomial Distributions\n\n* **Binomial Criteria Framework (BINS):**\n * **B - Binary Outcomes:** Each individual trial results in one of exactly two outcomes: a "Success" or a "Failure".\n * **I - Independent Trials:** The outcome of any given trial does not affect or alter the outcome of any other trial.\n * **N - Number Fixed:** There is a predetermined, fixed number of trials n.\n * **S - Same Probability:** The probability of success p remains constant across all trials.\n\n* **Standard Mathematical Formulas for Binomial Random Variable X \sim \text{Bin}(n, p)$format:
Probability Mass Function (PMF):
Mean / Expected Value:
Variance:
Standard Deviation:
SAT Multiple Choice Random Guessing Application:
Parameters: questions, probability of correct guessing on a 5-option question .
Probability of answering 6 or more questions correctly (P(X \ge 6)$format):\n P(X \ge 6) = 1 - P(X \le 5) = 1 - \text{binomcdf}(25, 0.20, 5)\n P(X \le 5) = \text{binomcdf}(25, 0.20, 5) \approx 0.6167\n P(X \ge 6) = 1 - 0.6167 = 0.3833\n\n* **Clemson University Freshmen Graduation Case Study:**\n * Parameters: Sample size n = 16p = 0.63.\n * Figure showing handwritten solutions:\n \n\n * **Verification of Binomial Settings (BINS):**\n * **Binary:** Each freshman either graduates in 4 years (Success) or does not graduate in 4 years (Failure).\n * **Independent:** The graduation outcome of one freshman is independent of the graduation outcome of another freshman on the floor.\n * **Number Fixed:** There is a fixed sample size of n = 16 freshmen.\n * **Same Probability:** Each freshman has an identical probability p = 0.63 of graduating in 4 years.\n * **Probability Exactly Half Graduate (X = 8):**\n P(X = 8) = \text{binompdf}(16, 0.63, 8) \approx 0.1118\,\text{(or } 11.18\% \text{)}\n * **Probability More Than 10 Freshmen Graduate (P(X > 10)$format):**
Probability Less Than 5 Freshmen Graduate (P(X < 5)$format):**\n P(X < 5) = P(X \le 4) = \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 4) = 0.0023\,\text{(or } 0.23\% \text{)}\n * **Probability At Least 6 Freshmen Graduate (P(X \ge 6)$format):
Probability At Most 7 Freshmen Graduate (P(X \le 7)$format):**\n P(X \le 7) = \text{binomcdf}(16, 0.63, 7) = 0.0926\,\text{(or } 9.26\% \text{)}\n * **Expected Number of Freshmen to Graduate (\mu):**\n \mu = n \times p = 16 \times 0.63 = 10.08\n * **Interpretation:** Over time, an average of 10.08 freshmen on a dorm floor of 16 are expected to graduate in 4 years.\n * **Standard Deviation Calculation (\sigma) and Interpretation:**\n \sigma = \sqrt{n \times p \times (1 - p)} = \sqrt{16 \times 0.63 \times 0.37} = \sqrt{3.7296} \approx 1.93\n * **Interpretation:** In repeated random selections of 16 freshmen, the number of freshmen who graduate in 4 years will typically vary from the expected mean (10.081.93 students.\n\n# Expected Value & Decision Analysis\n\n* **Carnival Coin Selection Game Analysis:**\n * **Game Rules:** A blindfolded player selects one coin at random from a container containing 60 total coins. Game entry costs \$0.25, and the player keeps the drawn coin.\n * **Coin Composition & Individual Probabilities:**\n * Pennies (\$0.01P = \frac{9}{60}\n * Nickels (\$0.05P = \frac{8}{60}\n * Dimes (\$0.10P = \frac{12}{60}\n * Quarters (\$0.25P = \frac{16}{60}\n * Half-Dollars (\$0.50P = \frac{11}{60}\n * Dollar pieces (\$1.00P = \frac{4}{60}\n * Total Coins: 9 + 8 + 12 + 16 + 11 + 4 = 60\,\text{coins}\n * **Expected Value Computation (E(V)):**\n E(V) = (0.01)\left(\frac{9}{60}\right) + (0.05)\left(\frac{8}{60}\right) + (0.10)\left(\frac{12}{60}\right) + (0.25)\left(\frac{16}{60}\right) + (0.50)\left(\frac{11}{60}\right) + (1.00)\left(\frac{4}{60}\right)\n E(V) = \frac{0.09 + 0.40 + 1.20 + 4.00 + 5.50 + 4.00}{60} = \frac{15.19}{60} \approx \$0.2532\n * **Financial Decision Conclusion:**\n * Expected Net Gain per Play: E(V) - \text{Cost} = \$0.2532 - \$0.2500 = +\$0.0032\n * Decision: A player should expect to gain money in the long run because the expected value of the coin selected (\$0.2532\$0.25 cost to play.\n\n# Continuous Random Variables & Standard Normal Distributions\n\n* **Standard Normal Distribution Variable Z \sim N(0, 1)$format:
Probability Comparison & Ordering:
Event I:
Event II:
Event III:
Ordered from smallest to largest probability: II (), III (), I ().
Tennis Serve Speed Percentile Evaluation:
Distribution: Serve speeds .
Target observation: Taylor Fritz serve speed .
Standardized -score calculation:
Percentile derivation:
Adult Male Cholesterol Level Parameter Derivation:
Distribution: Cholesterol levels .
High cholesterol threshold condition: .
Given high cholesterol proportion:
Standard score for the 92nd percentile:
Solving for mean cholesterol level :
High School Daily Phone Screen Time Study:
Distribution: Screen time .
Proportion Spending Longer Than 370 Minutes (P(X > 370)$format):**\n Z = \frac{370 - 325}{25} = \frac{45}{25} = 1.80\n P(X > 370) = P(Z > 1.80) = 1 - P(Z \le 1.80) = 1 - 0.9641 = 0.0359\,\text{(or } 3.59\% \text{)}\n * **Probability Spending Between 300 and 400 Minutes (P(300 < X < 400)$format):
Minimum Screen Time Cutoff for the Top 12% of Students:
Sampling Distributions & Central Limit Theorem
Disney World Space Mountain Wait Time Comparison:
Individual wait time .
Sample size riders, with sample mean wait time .
Sampling distribution parameters:
Probability evaluation for wait times under 46 minutes:
Individual rider (P(X < 46)$format):\n Z = \frac{46 - 50}{4} = -1.00 \implies P(Z < -1.00) \approx 0.1587\n * Sample mean of 16 riders (P(\bar{x} < 46)$format):
Conclusion: is larger than because the sampling distribution of has a smaller standard deviation () than the individual wait time distribution ().
Central Limit Theorem (CLT) Population Normality Requirements:
The population distribution does NOT need to be normally distributed for the sampling distribution of to be approximately normal.
Central Limit Theorem Core Principle: When the sample size is sufficiently large (), the sampling distribution of the sample mean will be approximately normal regardless of the shape of the underlying population distribution.
Bluffton High School Teacher Email Analysis:
Individual teacher daily email output .
Random sample size teachers.
Sampling Distribution Mean (\mu_{\bar{x}}$format):**\n \mu_{\bar{x}} = \mu = 12\,\text{emails}\n * **Justification:** The sample mean \bar{x}\mu.\n * **Sampling Distribution Standard Deviation (\sigma_{\bar{x}}$format) & Condition Checking:
Condition to Check: The 10% Condition (Independence Condition). The total population size must be at least 10 times larger than the sample size (). There must be at least 500 teachers in the population (or sampling performed with replacement) to ensure individual teacher observations are independent.
Probability One Selected Teacher Sends Between 9 and 11 Emails (P(9 < X < 11)$format):**\n Z_1 = \frac{9 - 12}{2.45} \approx -1.2245\n Z_2 = \frac{11 - 12}{2.45} \approx -0.4082\n P(9 < X < 11) = \text{normalcdf}(9, 11, 12, 2.45) \approx 0.2309\,\text{(or } 23.09\% \text{)}\n * **Probability Sample Mean of 50 Teachers is Between 9 and 11 Emails (P(9 < \bar{x} < 11)$format):
Comparative Likelihood Analysis:
Selecting one teacher who sends between 9 and 11 emails () is significantly more likely than finding a sample average of 50 teachers between 9 and 11 emails ().
Reasoning: Individual data values exhibit far greater variability than sample averages. Increasing the sample size shrinks the standard deviation of the sample mean (), tightly packing the distribution of around the mean . Because the interval excludes the mean of 12, the probability of the sample average falling in that interval approaches zero.
Impact of Increasing Sample Size to :
When sample size increases to , standard deviation decreases to .
As decreases, the sampling distribution concentrates even more tightly around . Consequently, the probability decreases even further toward 0.