11/12 HIST

The Raid at Harpers Ferry

  • Context of the Raid

    • Date: 1859

    • Leader: John Brown, a white abolitionist

    • Participants: A group of anti-slavery activists and formerly enslaved individuals

    • Purpose: To raid the US armory at Harpers Ferry (Virginia) to take arms for an uprising among enslaved people.

  • Background on Slavery in Virginia

    • Approximately 580,000 individuals enslaved in Virginia at the time.

    • Plan to inspire fugitivity and conduct guerrilla warfare in the Southern Appalachian Mountains.

  • Outcome of the Raid

    • Tactical errors led to capture.

    • All 16 members either killed or captured; John Brown ultimately executed by hanging in 1861.

  • Cultural Impact

    • In 1861, the song "John Brown's Body" is written, becoming a popular anthem for Union troops.

    • Lyrics state, "John Brown's body lies a moldering in his grave, but his soul goes marching on."

  • Ideological Reception

    • Northerners: Viewed John Brown as a heroic figure encouraging Union soldiers.

    • Southerners: Saw him as a diabolical entity, emphasizing the division in viewpoints regarding abolitionism.

  • Contributions of Black Comrades

    • Often overlooked in history, but they had significant motivations:

      • Two were students from Oberlin College, a center for abolitionist activism.

      • Dangerfield Newby, whose wife remained enslaved in Virginia, sought to rescue her.

      • Harriet Newby urged him through letters, including one just before the raid, indicating an imminent relocation into slavery.

      • Dangerfield was killed at Harpers Ferry; his body was mutilated by locals afterward.

Broader Context Leading to the Civil War

  • John Brown's Vision vs. Surrender to Government Action

    • Many abolitionists felt that the government was failing to act against slavery.

    • By 1859, activists increasingly believed that armed resistance was their only hope.

  • Expansion and Reinforcement of Slavery

  • Historical Legal Framework

    • The Compromise of 1850: Strengthened the Fugitive Slave Law and allowed new states to determine for themselves whether to permit slavery through “popular sovereignty” (i.e., local voting).

    • Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854: Allowed the extension of slavery into the northern territories of Kansas and Nebraska, inflaming tensions between proslavery and antislavery groups.

  • Consequences of Political Actions

    • Urban violence termed "Bleeding Kansas" emerged from conflicts between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers.

    • John Brown's first acts of violence against pro-slavery forces occurred in this context.

Important Legal and Political Decisions

  • Dred Scott Decision (1857)

    • Ruling: Chief Justice Roger Taney stated that no person of African ancestry could claim citizenship in the United States and had no constitutional rights.

    • The ruling invalidated the Missouri Compromise and further entrenched the institution of slavery.

  • Political Climate Post-Dred Scott

    • The perceived powerlessness of legal means to counteract slavery led to increased desperation among abolitionists.

    • John Brown's raid reflected the resulting radicalization within the abolitionist movement.

Secession and Political Breakdown

  • Secessionist Movement

    • Grew post-John Brown's raid, fueled by fears regarding the election of Abraham Lincoln (1860).

    • Recognized as a mainstream movement in response to perceived threats against slave-holding economic interests and social order.

  • Election of 1860

    • Lincoln won with about 40% of the popular vote, while the Democratic Party split, fielding two candidates.

    • Lincoln's platform: Primarily preventing the expansion of slavery rather than outright abolition.

  • Economic Factors

    • Post-Lincoln election: Slave prices dropped by one-third, causing alarm among slaveholders about the viability of the institution.

    • Economic dependency on slave labor, particularly in agriculture, was a driving factor behind secession.

  • Deep South vs. Border States

    • Differences in economic reliance on slavery led to varying approaches to secession:

    • Deep South: Primarily slave-dependent economies, seceded first.

    • Border South: Less economically reliant on slavery, remained with the Union for longer.

Philosophical and Ethical Underpinnings

  • Arguments Justifying Secession

    • Slavery seen as foundational to the economic success and societal structure of the South.

    • Racist and gender panic driving fear of societal collapse and loss of white dominance if abolition succeeded.

    • Assertions suggesting a likelihood of "black governance" and the associated dangers were widely disseminated.

  • Attitudes Toward Slavery in Contemporary Discourse

    • Notable speeches by Southern leaders espoused the idea that foundational inequity justified the perpetuation of slavery.

    • Examples include arguments from prominent figures who equated the questioning of slavery to fundamental threats to Southern culture and stability.

  • Proslavery American Dream vs. Free Soil American Dream

    • Competing visions highlighting the transitional conflict in which many valued liberty and autonomy differently, leading to polarization and conflict.

    • Northern fears of losing economic rights and personal dignity due to the pro-slavery agenda informed their resistance to secession.

Final Note on the Structure of Secession Movements

  • Three Distinct Souths

    • Deep South: Heavily invested in slavery and secessionist.

    • Middle South: Mixed responses to secession based on investment and regional differences.

    • Border South: States with lesser dependence on slavery that chose not to secede.

  • Georgia's Complex Response

    • Mixed feelings towards secession; some were supportive, while others opposed it vehemently, leading to internal conflict.

    • Voting processes and conventions reflected a struggle between elite interests and the broader population's desires for representation and agency.

  • Future Considerations

    • The continued examination of these movements and differing ideologies is crucial to understanding the Civil War's complexities.