Frampton-96-99:109-115

Chapter 9: Henry van de Velde and the Abstraction of Empathy (1895-1914)

Early Career

Henry van de Velde made his debut as an architect and designer in 1895, when he designed and built a house for himself in Uccle, near Brussels. This house was a key example of his vision for a Gesamtkunstwerk, integrating not just the architecture but also all elements within it, including furnishings and the cutlery. Van de Velde also sought to express this integration in the flowing forms of the dresses he designed for his wife.

Influences and Ideas

Van de Velde began to explore the relationship between art and society in an 1894 essay 'Déblaiement d'art,' influenced by Pre-Raphaelite ideas and the avant-garde group Les XX, which he was involved in. This group aimed to concern itself with the design of the entire environment, influenced by the Arts and Crafts movement from England, especially the teachings of Walter Crane. The influence of Gustave Serrurier-Bovy, who showcased an Arts and Crafts style, helped Van de Velde in shaping his aesthetic, focusing on a holistic approach to art and domestic living.

Fight Against Ugliness

Van de Velde believed that 'ugliness' corrupts the perception and morality of individuals. His response was to focus on designing every aspect of domestic settings, but he felt ill-equipped to tackle urban environments. Despite sharing the Pre-Raphaelites' disdain for modern architecture, he was influenced by various socialist ideas, engaging with radical thinkers like Emile Vandervelde and poet-critic Emile Verhaeren.

Theoretical Framework

The theoretical foundations of van de Velde's work involved aesthetic theories, particularly the concepts of 'Kunstwollen' coined by Alois Riegl and 'Einfühlung' or empathy by Theodor Lipps. Van de Velde integrated empathy into his designs, reflecting a desire to connect emotional experiences with artistic expression. He derived strength from Nietzsche’s dichotomy of Apollonian and Dionysian in culture, which defined the contrasts in his own artistic endeavors.

Architecture and Form

Van de Velde sought to create 'pure' organic forms, reflecting a desire for transcendent and empathetic association with design, resonating with the primordial forms of Neolithic culture. This quest for an organic aesthetic culminated in structures he built in Chemnitz and Hagen between 1903 and 1906.

Struggle with Classicism

Despite his modernist inclinations, traces of Classicism persisted in his works. His design philosophy emphasized the dualities of empathetic expression and abstraction, aiming for an architectural language that transcended typical norms. His respect for Gothic architecture highlighted his belief in architecture's capacity to convey vitality beyond mere structural function.

Contribution to Arts and Crafts

By 1904, van de Velde had become a professor at the Grand Ducal School of Arts and Crafts in Weimar, where he influenced future design movements, emphasizing the importance of "crafted" lines in integrating function with aesthetics. His work signified a transition towards an understanding that good design should engage users emotionally and practically.

Legacy and Later Work

Van de Velde’s greatest architectural expression was the Werkbund Theatre in Cologne, completed in 1914. Despite its achievements, he faced personal doubts regarding the role of the artist amid a changing industrial landscape. His theories continued to resonate, advocating for a new integration of the audience and actor in a collective societal experience.

Chapter 12: The Deutsche Werkbund (1898-1927)

Origins and Development

The Deutsche Werkbund emerged in the context of 19th-century industrialization in Germany, responding to the urgent need for improving design in both crafts and industries. The movement sought to elevate the aesthetic quality of German products to compete internationally, as artists like Hermann Muthesius pushed for a normative design that aligned with crafts.

Historical Context

In the late 1800s, Germany was characterized by a desire for industrial efficiency, distinguishing it from Britain's approach to design and production. Influential critics like Gottfried Semper and later Naumann focused on the significance of integrating art and industry, proposing that design be more culturally and artistically driven.

Role of Key Figures

Muthesius’s critique and subsequent advocacy for refined industrial production allowed the Werkbund to gain traction. Initial members, including renowned artists and craftsmen, were committed to advancing design quality in German industries. Semper's review of contemporary design issues paved the way for Muthesius and others to promote a synthesis of art and machine production.

Influence of Industrial Power

Behrens' appointment to AEG showcased the dawning of a new industrial ethos where art embraced technology. His work exemplified the beginnings of a machine aesthetic, while promising to harmonize industry with art, yielding structures that celebrated the power of industrial progress.

Tensions and Evolution

Diverse interpretations within the Werkbund led to tensions between promoting artistic individuality and mass production. Van de Velde’s insistence on the integrity of the artist stood in contrast to Muthesius’s standardized approach, creating a dynamic dialogue that would shape the organization's future.

Modernization and Legacy

The fallout from World War I filtered through the Werkbund, leading to a reevaluation of design priorities. Emphasis shifted toward functionalism and the practical aspects of living in an industrialized state, paving the way for movements like Neue Sachlichkeit. The spirit that the Werkbund sought to instill ultimately evolved but remained rooted in its initial objectives of marrying artistry with industry.