Preliminary Offences: Attempt
Preliminary Offences: Attempt
10.1 Definition of Attempt
Attempt: An attempt occurs when a person tries to commit an offence but fails to complete it.
Example: A defendant fires a gun at a victim intending to kill, but misses due to the victim bending down. Charges: Attempted murder.
Case Example: R v White (1910)
Facts: Defendant put cyanide in his mother’s drink intending to kill her. She died of a heart attack before drinking it.
Outcome: Convicted of attempted murder.
10.1.1 Legal Definition
According to s 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981:
"If, with intent to commit an offence to which this section applies, a person does an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence, he is guilty of attempting to commit the offence."
Key Points:
Charges for attempts can only be brought for offences triable on indictment (including either-way offences).
Offences triable summarily only cannot lead to an attempt charge.
Elements of Attempt
Actus Reus: An act that goes beyond merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
Mens Rea: Intent to commit that offence.
10.2 Actus Reus of Attempt
The act must be more than mere preparation for the main crime.
Example Scenarios:
Buying or modifying a weapon is merely preparatory.
Planning a robbery is still considered merely preparatory.
Legal Tests
Case Reference: R v Campbell (1990)
Defendant was outside a bank with items suggesting intent to rob but was found not guilty due to being merely preparatory.
Requirement of Change:
Attorney-General's Reference (No. 1 of 1992) clarified that the defendant does not need to perform the last act before the crime or reach a point of no return.
Cases Showing Mere Preparation
R v Gullefer (1987): Disrupted a horse race intending to reclaim a lost bet. Held to be merely preparatory due to additional steps required.
R v Geddes (1996): Found in a school with items for false imprisonment without approaching a victim. Conviction quashed as it was merely preparatory.
R v Campbell (1990): Possessed an imitation gun but did not enter the post office. Conviction quashed.
Cases with Established Attempts
R v Boyle and Boyle (1987): Attempting burglary upheld as the defendants were found at a broken entry point to a building.
R v Tosti (1997): Held guilty of attempted burglary for preparing to cut a padlock, showing intent and operational action.
R v Jones (1990): Defendant attempted murder with a shotgun inside a vehicle with intent established despite safety measures. Convicted.
10.3 Mens Rea of Attempt
Intent Requirement: The defendant must show the same level of intent as required for the complete offence.
Case Example: R v Easom (1971): Handbag was returned without stealing; attempted theft conviction quashed due to lack of intent.
Case Example: R v Husseyn (1977): Attempted theft of equipment ended in quash against conviction; intent was not proven.
Conditional Intention
Attorney-General's Reference (Nos 1 and 2 of 1979): Established that conditional intent is sufficient. D can be charged under conditions where D intends to steal if there is something worth stealing.
Mens Rea of Attempted Murder
Higher Requirement: Intent to kill must be proven; intent to cause grievous bodily harm is insufficient.
Case Example: R v Whybrow (1951): Defined the mens rea for attempted murder as needing an intention to kill.
Recklessness Not Sufficient
Recklessness generally does not suffice for mens rea in attempts despite being acceptable in completed offences.
Case Example: R v Millard and Vernon (1987): Attempted criminal damage conviction quashed; recklessness not sufficient.
Notable Exception: Recklessness about specific parts of the offence may meet the criterion.
Attorney-General's Reference (No. 3 of 1992) (1994): Recklessness can suffice for endangering life.
10.4 Impossibility
Understanding Impossibility: Impossibility can arise where the defendant believes they can commit an offence that is legally or physically impossible.
Case Example: Anderton v Ryan (1985): Quashed conviction for believing a non-stolen item was stolen.
Case Overruled: R v Shivpuri (1986): Conviction upheld despite the suitcase carrying no drugs; highlights the shifting legal stance on impossibility.
Clauses in the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, particularly ss 1(2) and 1(3), clarify that guilty attempts can occur even if full offences are impossible.
Key Points About Attempted Offences
The law has drawn a fine line on what constitutes 'merely preparatory' versus an attempt.
An omission cannot constitute an attempt.
Summary Points:
Attempt is defined under s 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981.
Clear tests exist for actus reus and mens rea.
Recklessness typically falls short unless concerning specific elements.
Impossibility does not automatically exempt from liability for attempt, per established cases and legal standards.