HOTA Cold War Origins Notes
The Cold War; The Breakdown of the Grand Alliance
Key Developments: 1946-1947
Soviet moves for consolidating influence
Salami Tactics
Term coined by Hungarian Communist leader, Matyas Rakosi – When commenting on how the USSR secured Communist control in Eastern Europe stated “like slicing off salami – piece by piece
Stage 1: the Soviets supervised the organization of governments in the Eastern European states, initially establishing a broad alliance of anti-fascists
Stage 2: each of the parties was sliced off, one after another
the communist core was left, and then ultimately the local Communists were replaced, if needed, with Moscow trained people
Baggage Train Leaders
Baggage Train Leaders
Men who had spent much of the war in Moscow, and were considered by the Soviets to be “trustworthy”
Bolesław Bierut was a Polish Communist leader, NKVD agent, and a hardline Stalinist who became President of Poland after the Soviet takeover of the country in the aftermath of World War II.
Vasil Petrov Kolarov was a Bulgarian communist political leader and leading functionary in the Communist International (Comintern)
Ana Pauker was a Romanian communist leader and served as the country's foreign minister in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Ana Pauker became the world's first female foreign minister when entering office in December 1947. She was also the unofficial leader of the Romanian Communist Party right after World War II.
Mátyás Rákosi was a Jewish Hungarian communist politician. Froom 1949 to 1956, he was the de facto ruler of Communist Hungary. An ardent Stalinist, his government was a satellite of the Soviet Union.
These leaders made sure that the post war governments of their prospective countries would be backed by Moscow – backed “Stalinist” communists
Free elections promised by Stalin at Yalta – to occur in a matter of weeks – were not held until January 19, 1947.
Prior to these elections, there was a campaign of murder, censorship, and intimidation.
An estimated 50,000 people were deported to Siberia prior to elections
Case Study: Poland
During the election in Poland in January of 1947:
Stanisław Mikołajczyk, Prime Minister of the Polish government in exile during World War II and leader of the Polish Peasant Party, saw his party have:
246 candidates disqualified from the election
149 candidates and members arrested
18 candidates/ members murdered
1 million voters were taken off of the electoral register
Desmond Donnelly, Struggle for the World, “ in these appalling circumstances of intimidation, it was not surprising that Bierut’s Communists secured complete control in Poland” (1965)
Soviet Perspective on these elections was quite different from that of the West – who saw this as a breach of Yalta – Soviets saw this as a victory over “Western expansionism”
Nikita Khrushchev, Krushchev Remembers (Little, Brown and Co. 1970) vol. 2, p. 166
“The political goals set by Mikolajczyk in cahoots with Churchill required that Warsaw be liberated by (British and American) forces before the Soviet army reached the city. That way a pro- Western government supported by Mikolajczyk would already be in control of the city by the time that Soviets arrived. But it didn’t work out that way. Our troops under Rokossovsky got there first”
Overall a pattern emerges similar to that in Poland in Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary, all had been occupied by the Red Army. Only Czechoslovakia and Finland had a semblance of democracy
Soviet Pressure on Iran
USSR tried to increase its political control in Iran in the aftermath of WWII
At Tehran, it had been agreed that both the British and Soviets would withdraw their troops from Iran after the war.
British remove their troops
Stalin left 30,000 troops in the northern part of the country, claiming that they were needed to help put down internal rebellion
Unsurprising, these troops encouraged a Communist uprising
Iran asks US and Britain for help, seeing this as a breach of the wartime agreements
On January 1, 1946, Stalin refuses – wants access to Iranian oil
Four days later, in a letter to Secretary of State James Byrnes, Truman reveals that he thinks the Soviet Union will invade Turkey and the Black Sea Straits
“unless Russia is faced with an Iron Fist and strong language, war is in the making”
Iran had to make a formal protest to the UN concerning the continued presences of Soviet forces. This was the first crisis faced by the UN
Moscow agrees to pull its troops out
Instability and Communist Parties Elsewhere in Europe
Instability in Greece and Turkey
Post WWII, anti-imperialist, nationalist, and somewhat Pro-Communist rebellions in these countries
British, and to a slightly lesser degree the US, believed that these rebellions were being directed and supported by the Soviets.
Stalin does assert that he wants Soviet control of the Straits of Constantinople, rather than Turkish control of the area
Communist Parties in Italy and France
Grew stronger in post war Europe.
Membership increasing due to the economic hardships experience at the end of the war
Americans and British are worried that these parties are receiving encouragement from Moscow (not nearly as much as in Eastern Europe), and are worried that these countries could be weak links in anti-Communist Western Europe
Kennan’s Long Telegram
February of 1946, US diplomat in Moscow, George F. Kennan, sent a telegram to the US State Department on the nature of Soviet foreign policy and conduct
His views in this telegram, on the motives behind Soviet foreign policy, will have lasting influence on the State Department
Key idea: the Soviet system is buoyed by the “threat” of a “hostile” world outside its borders, and that the USSR was “fanatically and implacably hostile to the West: Impervious to the logic of reason Moscow [is] highly sensitive to the logic of force. For this reason it can easily withdraw – and usually does – when strong resistance is encountered at any point.”
Kennan is arguing:
The USSR’s view of the world was a traditional one of insecurity
The Soviets want to advances Muscovite Stalinist ideology (not simply Marxism)
The Soviet regime was cruel and repressive and justified this by perceiving nothing but evil in the outside world. That view of a hostile outside environment would sustain the internal Stalinist system
The USSR was fanatically hostile to the West – but it was not suicidal
Kennan’s logic of force argument helped harden attitudes in the US and helped play a key role in the development of the policy of containment
NV Novikov, Soviet Ambassador to the US
Sends telegram to Stalin in 1946, after the Kennan telegram
Set out concerns about US actions he saw as imperialist and thus a threat to Russia:
“The foreign policy of the United States, which reflects the imperialist tendencies of American monopolist capital, is characterized in the postwar period by a striving for world supremacy. This is the real meaning of the many statements by President Truman and other representatives of American ruling circles; that the United States has the right to lead the world. All the forces of American diplomacy – the army, the air force, the navy, industry, and science – are enlisted in the service of this foreign policy. For this purpose broad plans for expansion have been developed and are being implemented through diplomacy and the establishment of a system of naval and air bases stretching far beyond the boundaries of the United States, through the arms race, and through the creation of ever newer types of weapons.”
Kennan and Novikov’s telegrams indicate the suspicion that was emerging in both the United States and Soviet Russia
Basis for Iron Curtain Speech
By 1946, Soviet dominated governments in:
Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria
This was in spite of hopes at Yalta that there would be free and democratic elections in Eastern Europe post WWII
Communist regimes not tied to Moscow had also been established:
Albania, Yugoslavia
By 1949, communism had expanded to include:
East Germany and Czechoslovakia
Red army is still occupying much of Eastern Europe, and thus a cloak of secrecy descends upon Eastern Europe soon after the war
Soviet Reaction to Churchill’s Speech
Swift response: Outrage
Within a week, Stalin compares Churchill to Hitler
Saw the speech as racist and a call to war with the Soviet Union
USSR takes the following steps within 3 weeks of the speech:
They withdrew from the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
They stepped up the tone and intensity of anti-Western propaganda
They initiated a new five-year economic pan of self-strengthening
The iron curtain speech led to a further hardening of opinions on both sides. Churchill had publically defined the new front line in what was now being seen as a new war
The Truman Doctrine
Truman makes a key speech to the US Congress on March 12th, 1947.
Put forward the belief that the US had obligations to “support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures”
This becomes known as the “Truman Doctrine”
Culmination of shift in US foreign policy: isolationist to interventionist
Woodrow Wilson WWI – ran in 1914 on “he kept us out of war” then enters WWI on promise to “make the world safe for democracy”
Roosevelt – WWII lend-lease program
Truman doctrine is a response to unstable situations in Turkey and especially Greece
British had restored the Greek monarchy following WWII, but communist guerillas continued to resist in the countryside.
British could no longer support Greek government and army financially, as its own economy had been devastated by the war, and is roughly 3 billion pounds in debt
The Truman Doctrine
In February of 1947, British told the US that they could no longer maintain tropps in Greece
US cannot afford a potential Communist takeover
Greece is at a strategic location in Europe – gateway to Western Europe
US aid sent to Greece
Roughly 400 million dollars in financial aid
Military advisors are sent to Greece to help combat communists
Soviet perspective
Evidence of the determination of US to expand its sphere of influence
Soviets believe US involvement in Europe is not legitimate
Both the long telegram and iron curtain speech influence Truman before making his “doctrine”
Correct perception of expansionist threat of Soviets
Beginning of the policy of containment of Communism – will draw the US into the affairs of nations well beyond Europe
Political Historian Walter LaFeber
On the longer-term significance of the Truman Doctrine
“The Truman Doctrine was a milestone in American History … the doctrine became an ideological shield behind which the United States marched to rebuild the Western political and economic system and counter the radical left. From 1947 on, therefore, any threats to that Western system could be easily explained as Communist inspired, not as problems which arose from difficulties within the system itself. That was the most lasting and tragic result of the Truman Doctrine.”
America, Russia, and the Cold War, 5th ed. (Knopf, 1985) pp. 57-58
Directly for Greece and Turket, expansion into the Marshall plan and containment
The Marshall Plan
In January of 1947, Secretary of State James Byrnes resigned, and was replaced by General George Marshall.
Marshall believes that the economies of Western Europe needed immediate help from the USA
“Patient is sinking while the doctors deliberate”
Marshall plan – an economic extension of the ideas outline in the Truman Doctrine
The Marshall plan – Dollar Imperialism?
Designed to give immediate economic help to Europe
Set down strict criteria to qualify for American economic aid
Involved allowing the US to investigate the financial records of applicant counties
Stated aims of the Marshall Plan:
Revive European Economics so that political and social stability could ensue
Safeguard the future of the US economy
US wants to avoid the interpretation that they were coercing European governments to accept the plan, so it was made clear that the initiative had to come from Europe
The bill allocating the money did not pass Congress until March 1948
17 Billion dollars
Successfully passed after the Czech Coup in February of 1948
Marshall Plan Money
Yugoslavia 109 Million
Turkey 221 Million
Denmark 271 Million
Austria 677 Million
Netherlands 1.079 Billion
Italy 1.474 Billion
United Kingdom 3.176 Billion
France 2.706 Billion
West Germany 1.389 Billion
Greece 694 Million
Belgium/Luxembourg 556 Million
Norway 254 Million
Ireland 146 Million
Sweden 107 Million
Soviet Reaction and Response
Soviet Union Rejects the Marshall Plan – because Americans had asked to see recipients financial records
This is an example of American dollar imperials in Soviet minds
Marshall plan soon evolved into military alliances – LaFeber
Soviet Response
Molotov Plan
Series of bilateral trade agreements that aimed to ties the economies of Easter Europe to the USSR
Creation of COMECON in January of 1949 (Council for Mutual Economic Assistence)
Designed to stimulate and control their economic development and support the collectivization of agriculture and development of heavy industry
Cominform and the “two camps”
Cominform
Communist Information Bureau is created in 1947
Created as an instrument to increase Stalin’s control over the Communist parties of other countries
Initially comprised of communists in USSR, Yugoslavia, France, Italy, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania
West is concerned that the organization would spread communism (thus destabilizing the democratic governments) in its own backyard (think France, Italy)
Stalin’s two camps doctrine
Idea developed by Stalin in 20s and 30s – dividing up Europe into opposing camps
The aftermath of WWII makes this a reality.
Stalin gives “two camps” speech in 1946 before Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech.
Two Camps idea is discussed at first Cominform meeting
One Camp: American organized “anti-Soviet” bloc which was influencing from Europe to Latin America to Asia
The other: USSR and “new democracies” in Eastern Europe
Also included countries the Soviets deemed sympathetic at the time: Indonesia, Vietnam, India, Egypt, and Syria
Red Army Occupation of Eastern Europe 1945-1947
Soviets control Eastern Europe by creating what is known as a “satellite empire.”
Countries keep their separate legal identities, keeping them technically separate from each other and Russia
However, they were tied to following Moscow by the following factors:
Soviet Military Power (eventually formalized in Warsaw Pact in 1955)
Salami tactics, which transferred the machinery of government into the hands of obedient, pro-Soviet Communists
State police and spy networks
COMECON
One Eastern European Country where salami tactics are slow going: Czechoslovakia
Stalin opts to set a coup in motion to speed up the process
By the end of 1948, the satellite states were economically and militarily controlled by the USSR
Western Allies saw the “occupation” of Eastern Europe as a direct breach fo the agreements made at Yalta and Potsdam, and as clear evidence of Soviet expansionist policies in action
The Czechoslovakian Coup, February 1948
Stalin is worried about Czechoslovakia receiving Marshall Plan aid
Country is considering it
The west, perhaps feeling guilty after the Munich Agreements in 1938, doesn’t want to abandon the Czechs again
Stalin organizes for pressure to be put on the Czech coalition government
12 non communist members are forced to resign
Communists Party leader demands the formation of a communist government
Under heavy pressure from Moscow, and loosely veiled threats of armed intervention, Czech President Edvard Benes agrees to terms
Two weeks later, independent Czech foreign Minister Jan Masaryk was found dead under suspicious circumstances
This is used as evidence by Truman against the Soviets, becomes the final push to get the Marshall Plan through congress
The X Article -- 1947
Written by George Kennan, under the pseudonym, Mr. X
Argued that the long-term policy of the United States towards the Soviet Union had to be that of containment of Soviet Expansion
The US should regard the Soviet Union as a “rival” not partner
Kennan was a strong influence on Truman and his reputation as the United States key expert on Soviet Policy gave him a tremendous amount of influence over the American public
Czech Coup happens months after publishing, shows evidence of dangers of Soviet Union
The Berlin Crisis of 1948 (THERE ARE TWO BERLIN CRISIS, THIS LEADS TO BERLIN AIRLIFT, THE ONE IN 1960 LEADS TO BERLIN WALL)
Post War Germany
Germany had been invaded on two major fronts, making it extremely difficult to leave it undivided during occupation at the conclusion of the war
Germany split into for zones, administered by the Allied Control Council (ACC)
Berlin, in the eastern portion of the country, was governed by the Allied Kommandantur, made up of four military governors
All of this was supposed to be temporary
It was the intention that all of Germany be treated as one economically, and that a German state would once again emerge as a state
By 1949, German was permanently divided into two separate states (eventually reunified)
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Germany’s key strategic position and the differing aims of the main powers
Center of Europe
Potential economic strength – had been an industrial power
USSR does not want to see a resurgent united Germany that would pose a security threat
But it does want to get as much reparations as possible out of Germany
France feared a united Germany rising again on its eastern boarder
USA thinks rapid economic recovery of Germany would be best for health of western Europe
Would contain spread of communism
British backed this view, although they were bankrupt post war
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
The increasing lack of trust between East and West as the Cold war developed
The differences in aims and attitudes of the allied powers had in 1945 would have been enough on their own to delay any permanent peace settlement for Germany
But mutual suspicions between the USSR and the West began to harden, making it more difficult
Both sides worry about Germany joining the “other side” and tipping the fragile balance of power
James Byrnes gives “Speech of Hope” promising that Germany would be rebuilt and would not be divided economically, and that Germans would be allowed to govern themselves democratically
He also commits US troops to Germany as long as there is an occupation
“to win the German people … it was a battle between us and Russia over minds…”
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Specific Disputes between the post-war powers within Germany itself
Economic conflict
Reparations are key
USSR was to take 25% of German industrial equipment from the Western Zones in return for supplying those zones with food and raw materials
This did not work
Food was a huge problem in war-torn Germany
Compounded by a swell of refugees from Eastern Europe
USSR was not delivering enough food to the Western zone
Also increasingly secretive about what is going on in their zone
USA and UK stopped supplying the Soviet zone
German coal was another area of disagreement
Soviets want western coal, Americans want to use this coal to assist in the economic recovery of Western Europe
25 million tons exported to Europe, not Soviets
In early 1947, British and US zones are merged into a new unit called Bizonia
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Specific Disputes between the post-war powers within Germany itself
Political Conflict
Stalin is planning as early as June 1945 to reunify Germany and incorporate it into Russia’s sphere of influence
Red army controlled Soviet zone, and Communist Party of Germany (KDP) would attempt to get popular support
First step, merge the Social Democrats in Soviet zone with KDP, creating the Socialist United Party (SED)
Party did not win over West Germans however
The London Conference of Ministers 1947
Should have considered the German peace treaty, ends in Soviets and the West throwing accusations at each other, showing that agreement was far from happening
London Conference 1948
France, Britain, US draw up a constitution for a new West Germany
Also establish a new currency
The Berlin Blockade, 1948
Stalin’s response to establishing a West German state and new currency
Berlin is 100 miles within the Soviet zone, sealed off from the rest of Germany
Thus West Germans in the zone received their food and energy supplies from the Western zone, delivered on road, rail and air corridors
Stalin begins a total blockade of these routes
Roads, railways and waterways linking West Berlin with West Germany were closed, cut supply of electricity from west German to West Berlin, and the USSR left the Berlin Kommandantur, having left the ACC in March of 48
West defeats the blockade by air not by direct military confrontation
British and American planes flew more than 200,000 flights in 320 days, delivering vital supplies of food and coal to 2.2 million West Berliner
By 1949, its clear this is working, Soviets end the blockade
Results of the Berlin Blockade
First time since 1945 that war had been a possibility
Blockade has significant impact on the development of the Cold War
Any agreement would be extremely difficult to come by
Three major outcomes
Germany is divided
West, 1948, Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)
East, 1949, German Democratic Republic (GDR)
For the West, a divided Germany protected by the US was preferable to a neutral united Germany
Continuation of four-power control in Berlin
Berlin remained a divided city
The formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
April 1949,
USA, Canada, Brussels Pact Powers (1948 -- Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg,), Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Portugal
Defensive alliance
In Paris Pact, West Germany is added to NATO in 1955
Soviets respond w/ Warsaw Pact
Brings all of Eastern Europe under one military command
Conclusions that can be drawn: Europe 1949
Europe was now clearly divided along political, economic, and military lines
Germany was not to be reunited as had been an original aim of the Allies at the end of World War II. There were now two clear states, although neither side was prepared to recognize the existence of the other (until the 1970s)
The USA had abandoned its peacetime policy of avoiding commitments and was now involved economically (Marshall Plan) and militarily (NATO)
No peace treaty had actually been signed with Germany, which meant that the boarders of central Europe were not formalized. This was particularly worrying for Poland, as it now included territory taken from Germany in 1945 (not resolved until 1975)
Western countries had developed a greater sense of unity due to the Soviet threat
International Relations Beyond Europe?
From this time on, many conflicts, wherever they were in the world, would be seen as part of the struggle between Communism and Capitalism
The USA’s policy of containment, which had been developed to fight Communism in Europe, was to lead the USA into resisting Communism anywhere in the world that it perceived Communism was a threat. This would involve the USA fighting in both the Korean and Vietnam War
The United Nations was never to play the role envisioned in the original discussions between Roosevelt and Churchill at the time of its foundation. With the USA and the USSR now opposing each other and able to use their respective vetoes, the UN could not act effectively to resolve international conflicts.
Breakdown of the Grand Alliance - Steps to the political, economic and Military Division of Europe
Causation and Change
In 1945, American and Soviet Soldiers met at the River Elbe
Signified the final defeat of Germany, due to the successful collaboration between the USA and the Allies in the Grand Alliance
By 1949 however, Europe has been divided into two separate “spheres of influence”
In September of 1949, following the Berlin Blockade, the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) or West Germany was established
By October of 1949, the German Democratic Republic (GDR), or East Germany is established
This physical divide of Germany was a symbol of the divide in Europe to come
Breakdown of the Grand Alliance
When Germany attacked Russia in June of 1941, both British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and American President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent aid to the Soviets
Marks beginning of Grand Alliance
Churchill and the British, despite sending aid, still have highly unfavorable views of the Soviet State
“If Hitler invaded Hell, I would make at least favorable reference to the Devil in the House of Commons”
Still mutual suspicion
“an enemy of my enemy is my friend” applies to the relationship
Stalin wants more than the aid he is receiving – demands that the allies open up a second front to the war to deflect some of the pressure the Soviets are under
Allies agreed to this in principle, after all France was under occupation and the British were under bombardment, but said they were waiting for the right opportunity
This increases Stalin’s suspicion of the Allies – believes they are allowing Germany to weaken the USSR permanently
The Wartime Conferences
During the war, the decisions of the Grand Alliance determined the territorial and political structure of post war Europe.
Three major conferences: Tehran, Yalta, Potsdam
Key issues discussed at these Conferences
The state of the war
The status of Germany, Poland, Eastern Europe, and Japan
The United nations
The Tehran Conference
First Major Conference, held in Tehran Iran – November 1943
Leaders present: Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill
The State of the War
Allies were beginning turn the fight around, pushing the Germans back from North Africa and had invaded Italy
Soviets were pushing the Germans into retreat on the Eastern front
British and Americans had not launched a second front yet in Stalin’s eyes
Continues to press that the allies invade northwestern Europe
Early discussions on Japan start, US has begun its Island hopping strategy
The Tehran Conference: Germany
Question is raised – what to do with Germany post defeat
Divide between Stalin and Allies
Allies are looking to learn from Treaty of Versailles failures
Too punishing of Germany – leading to Hitler’s rise
Stalin is less forgiving
One major agreement: “unconditional surrender” of Germany was the objective
Roosevelt does believe that Operation Overlord – the allied invasion of northern France that would eventually begin June 6th 1944– was a priority
Tehran Conference: Poland
Stalin’s main concern: “security” – which influences his demands over the future of Germany, but also thus shapes his concerns over the shape of Poland’s post war boarders.
Stalin wants to secure his western boarder by taking land from Poland
Wants a pro-soviet government installed in Poland
Claims that historically, Poland had been a launching pad to the invasion of Russia
Thus it was agreed to that USSR was to keep territory seized in 1939 and Poland would be given territory on its western boarder with Germany
No independent Poland would agree to this – ensuring hostilities in the future between Poland and Germany
Made it likely that a puppet regime would have to be installed, and it would have to look to the USSR for security
Tensions between Pole and Soviets increased in 1943, when a mass grave of 10,000 Polish officers was discovered in the Katyn Forest. Though the Soviets blamed the Germans, many Poles rightly suspected that this had been committed by the Soviets
Tehran Conference: Eastern Europe
Soviets demanded the right to keep the territories that they had seized between 1939 and 1940, giving them control of the Baltic States and parts of Finland and Romania
Americans and British reluctantly agreed to allow it
Goes against the Atlantic Charter agreement between the United States and Britain
The Charter they drafted included eight “common principles” that the United States and Great Britain would be committed to supporting in the postwar world. Both countries agreed not to seek territorial expansion; to seek the liberalization of international trade; to establish freedom of the seas, and international labor, economic, and welfare standards.
Tehran Conference: Japan and UN
Japan
United States and Britain pressed the USSR to enter the war with Japan
Stalin says no until Germany has been stopped
The United Nations
British and Soviets give general approval of the idea of such an organization
Settle international disputes though collect security
Tehran overall:
Agreement on a new international organization
Agreement on the need weak post-war Germany
Roosevelt: “I got along fine with Marshal Stalin… I believe that we are going to get along very well with him and the Russian People…”
However, there is a growing gap between Soviet post war goals and Churchill
Roosevelt even assures Polish that Stalin is not imperialist
The Yalta Conference
By the time of February 1945 Yalta Conference on the Black Sea in Russia Stalin’s diplomatic position is greatly strengthened
Red Armies control most of Eastern Europe
Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill represent the big powers
Yalta: the State of the War
Germany is on the verge of defeat
Normandy landings in 1944 – second war front has been opened
British and Americans had forced the Germans from France, poised to cross the Rhine and invade Germany from the West
Soviets are ready to invade Germany from the East
Japan
Still fighting on, but are under heavy aerial bombardment from the Americans
USA is in control or Air and Sea in the Pacific
Japan is preparing for final defense of the homeland
Yalta Conference: Germany
Allies decide that Germany would be disarmed, demilitarized, de-Nazified, and divided
Four Zones of Occupation: USA, USSR, Britain, France would each control a portion
Divisions would be temporary and Germany was to be run as one country
Allied Control Council (ACC) would be set up to govern Germany
Stalin demands reparations
It was agreed Germany would pay 20 Billion, with half going to USSR
Yalta Conference: Poland
Biggest issue: boarders of Poland
Boarder between USSR and Poland would be drawn at the Curzon Line
Puts boundary to what it had been before the Russo-Polish War of 1921.
Poland would be compensated by gaining back territory taken by Germany
Land east of the Oder-Neisse Line
Thus Stalin gets what he wants in terms of boundaries
Establishment of Polish Government
British support the London Poles, pre-war government that had fled in 1939
Soviets want Communist Lublin Committee in Poland to form the new government
Katyn Forrest massacre and failure of Soviets to back Polish in Warsaw Uprising – specifically those who followed the London Poles
Yalta Conference: Eastern Europe and Japan
There is agreement over the future nature of governments in Eastern Europe
Stalin agrees that Eastern Europe would be able to have free elections
Perceived at the time as a major victory for Britain and US
Japan
Stalin promised to enter the war against Japan as soon as the war in Europe drew to a close
Demanded territory as a reward: South Sakhalin and Kuril Islands.
Terms accepted by Roosevelt and Stalin
Yalta Conference: United Nations
Stalin agreed that the Soviet Union would join the UN organization
Allies agree to five permanent members of the Security Council, each with veto power: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States
Stalin wants all 16 Soviet Republics to have seats in the UN General Assembly
British and USA agreed in the end to only Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
Three main positive outcomes of Yalta:
Agreement on UN
Soviet agreement to join the war with Japan
The Big Three signing a “Declaration on Liberated Europe” pledging for free elections in all European Countries, including those in Eastern Europe
Crucial Developments between Yalta and Potsdam Conferences
President Roosevelt died in April 1945, and was replaced by Truman, who was to adopt a more hardline approach towards the Soviets
Germany finally surrendered unconditionally on May 7th, 1945
Winston Churchill’s conservative party lost the July 1945 general election, and Churchill was succeeded as prime minister by Labour Party leader, Clement Attlee
As the war in Europe ended, the Soviet Red Army occupied territory as far west as deep inside Germany
On July 17, 1945, the day after Potsdam begins, the US successfully tested its first atomic bomb
Potsdam Conference
State of the War
May of 1945 Germany surrendered unconditionally
America is poised to invade Japan, planning on using its new Atomic Weapon
Germany
Yalta plans being put into effect
Economy was run as a “whole” but this was limited to domestic industry and agriculture (74% of 1936 capacity)
Soviets received 25% of their reparation bill from Western zones, Eastern Germany would trade them food
Poland
Truman is not happy with Yalta agreement, tried to challenge the Oder-Neisse Line
Truman wants government re-organized
Unhappy with Lublin-Dominated government, does not think that Stalin including London Poles in elections is satisfactory enough
Eastern Europe
US unhappy with British and Soviet Percentages Agreement
Percentages gave spheres of influence power in fate of Eastern European Europe and Southern Europe: EX: Romania – Russia 90% influence, 10% other, Greece UK 90%, Russia 10%, Yugoslavia 50-50, Hungary 50-50, Bulgaria Russia 75, others 25
Did not like control Russia got over Bulgaria and Romania
However, the Red Army control Eastern Europe, so it was hard to get Stalin to budge here
Japan
Others told of the bomb, which was first used on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945.
Three days later, second bomb is dropped on Nagasaki
Unconditional surrender is announced on September 2nd.
Truman hid details of the super weapon from Stalin
Americans did not encourage Soviet participation in war against Japanese
United Nations
Created, became a reality when chartered in San Francisco in 1945
Stalin would use veto power on anything not deemed to be in Soviet Interest
PAPER TWO UNITS START The Cold War - Signifcance and Causation
The Emergence of Superpowers
Following the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 at the end of World War II, two competing Superpowers emerge:
United States
Union of Soviet Socialists Republics (USSR)
In 1945, many expected this to evolve into a traditional rivalry, one that could lead to an armed conflict.
Instead, rapid escalation of nuclear armament by both countries makes the results of direct conflict unthinkable.
This leads to 45 years of ideological conflict, a conventional and nuclear arms race, and wars fought by proxy on the battlefields of Asia, Africa and Latin America
Leads to economic rivalry, and the development of huge spy networks as each side tried to discover the other’s military and strategic secrets
The Cold War
Fun Fact: American Journalist Walter Lippman, writing for the New York Herald Tribune in 1947 who popularized the term “Cold War”
Harry Truman preferred the phrase “the war of nerves”
Opposing Ideologies
Part of what made the Cold War so intense was that both of these Superpowers had fundamental differences in ideology
Made for natural, if not inevitable enemies.
The Bolshevek Revolution in Russia in 1917, saw Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party establish the world’s first Communist State, based on the ideas of 19th century economic philosopher Karl Marx
These ideas seemed to threaten basis of American and Western Society
America (and the “West”)
Economic Differences
Individuals should be able to compete with each other with a minimum of state interference and make as much money as they wish
Capitalism
Individuals are thus encouraged to work hard with the promise of individual reward
Political Differences
Individuals choose the government through voting. There is a range of political parties to choose from
Individuals have certain rights, such as freedom of the press
Liberal Democracy
USSR
Economic Differences
Capitalism creates divisions between rich and poor. Thus all businesses and farms should be owned by the state on behalf of the people
Communism
Goods will be distributed to individuals by the state. Everyone will thus get what is needed and everyone will be working for the collective good
Political Differences
There is no need for a range of political parties, as the Communist Party truly represents the views of all of the workers and rules on behalf of the people.
Individual freedoms valued by the west are not necessary
This is a one party state
Increasing Hostility Leading into World War II
There is mutual suspicion between the West and the USSR that manifests itself in various ways between the Bolshevik Revolution and the start of World War II
Russian Civil War 1918-1922
Estimated 7,000,000–12,000,000 casualties during the war, mostly civilians.
Red army is triumphant (Bolshevism – Russian form of Communism)
West had given support to the Conservative forces – the white army – which was a hodge-podge of anti-communist beliefs (favoring monarchism, capitalism and alternative forms of socialism, each with democratic and antidemocratic variants)
rival militant socialists and nonideological Green armies fought against both the Bolsheviks and the Whites
Eight nations – mainly Allies from WWI, and pro- German forces, helped against the Red Army, but without success
USSR does not receive diplomatic recognition or join the League of Nations until 1934
Hilter is appeased leading into World War II in part because of fear of Soviet Communism, which at the time was more feared than German Facism
The Non-Aggression Pact (Soviet-Nazi Pact) between USSR and Nazi Germany, signed in 1939, allowed Hitler to concentrate on attacking the West, increases tension between USSR and the rest of the West
Idealism v. Self Interest: What ideals underpinned the view of each country/ How was this achieved by each country?
USA
Idealism of Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt
Struggle for a better world based on collective security, political self-determination, and economic integration
Peace freedom, justice and plenty
Achieved by democracy/Capitalism and international co-operation
USSR
Marxist idealism and Stalinism
Struggle for a better world based on international socialism
Peace, freedom, justice, and plenty
Achieved by spreading Soviet- style communism
Idealism v. Self-Interest: Which Elements of self-interest lay behind each country’s ideals
USA
The need to establish markets and open doors to FREE TRADE
The desire to avoid another economic crisis of the magnitude of 1929
President Truman and most of the post war US administration’s belief that what was good for America was good for the world
USSR
The need to secure boarders
The need to recover from the effects of World War II
The need to regain strength as the nursery of Communism
Stalin’s belief that what was good for the USSR was good for the workers of the world
Significance of Stalinism
Stalin takes over leadership of the Soviet Union after the death of Lenin
Becomes the sole leader by the late 1920s
Stalin’s Policies
Collectivization of all farms
Leads to the death of millions of agricultural workers
Five-year plans
Industry: dramatically increase production, put USSR in a position to defeat the Nazi’s by 1945
Great Terror
Purges of all political opponents as well as millions of ordinary people
Gulag’s – slave labor camps
Executions
By 1945, Stalinism means:
Dominance of Stalin over the party, and the party over state institutions
A powerful state machinery
The ruthless maintenance of power by the elimination of opposing leaders, groups or entire sections of the population
The development of a regime associate with paranoia and violence
Stalin’s role in World War II
Stalin had hoped that engagement with Hitler could be delayed by the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939
Nazi Germany, which had not yet defeated the British in 1941, decided they can no longer wait to engage the Soviet Union
Operation Barbarossa
Red Army is ill prepared for war, many military leaders had not survived Stalin’s purges
Ukraine is quickly overrun
German Army besieged Leningrad and reached the outskirts of Moscow
Winter in Russia devastates the underprepared Germans
Soviet’s win at Stalingrad, start pushing Nazi’s back to Germany
Overall, Stalin plays a key role in defeating the Nazis
Made him more secure and powerful in the Soviet Union, and also puts the Soviet Union in a strong position to emerge as one of the leading powers of the post war world
General Costs of World War II
20 Million people were displaced in World War II
Europe: 23% of farmland could not be used for food production, severe crisis in 1946-47
USSR: 1,700 towns, 31,000 factories, 100,000 state farms destroyed
USSR: 25-27 Million Deaths
China: 10 million deaths
Japan: 2 Million deaths
Australia and New Zealand Deaths: roughly 50,000
Poland: 6 million deaths
Germany: 7 million deaths
France: 600,000 deaths
Great Britain: 357,000 deaths
Italy: 500,000 deaths
USA: GDP Doubles by 1944
400,000 deaths
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Military Reasons
To defeat Germany, USA had become the number one air force power in the world
To defeat Germany, USSR had become the number one land force power in the world
France’s and Britain’s inability to defeat Germany had changed the balance of power – they are now “second tier”
The USSR now lacked any strong military neighbors. This made it the regional power
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Economic Reason
The USA’s economy was strengthened by the war. It was now able to out-produce the other powers put together
The USA was committed to more “open trade” Its politicians and businesspeople wanted to ensure liberal trade, and market competition flourished. The United States was willing to play an active role in avoiding the re-emergence of the disastrous pre-war pattern of trade blocs and tariffs
The USA had the economic strength to prevent a return to instability in Europe
The small Eastern European countries that had been created after World War One were not economically viable on their own, so they needed the support of a stronger neighbor, and the USSR could replace Germany in this role
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Political Reasons
For the West, the outcome of World War Two showed that the ideals of democracy and international collaboration had triumphed over fascism. Thus the political system of the USA was the right path for the future
For the Soviet Union, it was Communism that had triumphed over fascism. Indeed Communism had gained widespread respect in Europe because of its part in resisting the Germans
The USSR had huge losses, and the role of the Red Army in defeating the Nazis, gave Stalin a claim to great influence in forming the post-war world.
The USSR had the political and military strength to prevent a return to instability in Eastern Europe. Communism could fill the political vacuum
The alliance that existed between the United States and the USSR to defeat Germany completely collapses by 1949.
Key Political Definitions
Liberalism
Liberals put their main emphasis on the freedom of the individual
Economically they believe in minimal interference by the state.
Foreign policy: promote the ideas of free trade and cooperation
Strong beliefs in:
Civil liberties (freedom of conscience, freedom of speech)
Universal suffrage
Parliamentary constitutional government
An independent judiciary
Diplomacy rather than force in relations between states
Fascism
This ideology is rooted in ideas that are the very opposite of liberalism
Limiting individual freedoms in the interest of the state
Extreme nationalism
Use of violence to achieve ends
Keeping power in the hands of an elite group or leader
An aggressive foreign policy
Socialism
Ideology developed in the early 19th century in the context of the Industrial Revolution
Socialists believe:
A more egalitarian social system
Governments providing for the more needy members of society
International cooperation and solidarity
Conservatism
The general implication is a belief in maintaining the existing or traditional order
Respect for traditional institutions
Limiting government intervention in people’s lives
Gradual and/or limited changes in the established order
Right Wing v. Left Wing
Right: describes groups who favor free-market capitalism and place an emphasis on law and order, limited state interference and traditional societal values
Left: describes those groups who favor more equality in society, and thus more government intervention in the economy to secure this situation
The Cold War; The Breakdown of the Grand Alliance
Key Developments: 1946-1947
Soviet moves for consolidating influence
Salami Tactics
Term coined by Hungarian Communist leader, Matyas Rakosi – When commenting on how the USSR secured Communist control in Eastern Europe stated “like slicing off salami – piece by piece
Stage 1: the Soviets supervised the organization of governments in the Eastern European states, initially establishing a broad alliance of anti-fascists
Stage 2: each of the parties was sliced off, one after another
the communist core was left, and then ultimately the local Communists were replaced, if needed, with Moscow trained people
Baggage Train Leaders
Baggage Train Leaders
Men who had spent much of the war in Moscow, and were considered by the Soviets to be “trustworthy”
Bolesław Bierut was a Polish Communist leader, NKVD agent, and a hardline Stalinist who became President of Poland after the Soviet takeover of the country in the aftermath of World War II.
Vasil Petrov Kolarov was a Bulgarian communist political leader and leading functionary in the Communist International (Comintern)
Ana Pauker was a Romanian communist leader and served as the country's foreign minister in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Ana Pauker became the world's first female foreign minister when entering office in December 1947. She was also the unofficial leader of the Romanian Communist Party right after World War II.
Mátyás Rákosi was a Jewish Hungarian communist politician. Froom 1949 to 1956, he was the de facto ruler of Communist Hungary. An ardent Stalinist, his government was a satellite of the Soviet Union.
These leaders made sure that the post war governments of their prospective countries would be backed by Moscow – backed “Stalinist” communists
Free elections promised by Stalin at Yalta – to occur in a matter of weeks – were not held until January 19, 1947.
Prior to these elections, there was a campaign of murder, censorship, and intimidation.
An estimated 50,000 people were deported to Siberia prior to elections
Case Study: Poland
During the election in Poland in January of 1947:
Stanisław Mikołajczyk, Prime Minister of the Polish government in exile during World War II and leader of the Polish Peasant Party, saw his party have:
246 candidates disqualified from the election
149 candidates and members arrested
18 candidates/ members murdered
1 million voters were taken off of the electoral register
Desmond Donnelly, Struggle for the World, “ in these appalling circumstances of intimidation, it was not surprising that Bierut’s Communists secured complete control in Poland” (1965)
Soviet Perspective on these elections was quite different from that of the West – who saw this as a breach of Yalta – Soviets saw this as a victory over “Western expansionism”
Nikita Khrushchev, Krushchev Remembers (Little, Brown and Co. 1970) vol. 2, p. 166
“The political goals set by Mikolajczyk in cahoots with Churchill required that Warsaw be liberated by (British and American) forces before the Soviet army reached the city. That way a pro- Western government supported by Mikolajczyk would already be in control of the city by the time that Soviets arrived. But it didn’t work out that way. Our troops under Rokossovsky got there first”
Overall a pattern emerges similar to that in Poland in Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary, all had been occupied by the Red Army. Only Czechoslovakia and Finland had a semblance of democracy
Soviet Pressure on Iran
USSR tried to increase its political control in Iran in the aftermath of WWII
At Tehran, it had been agreed that both the British and Soviets would withdraw their troops from Iran after the war.
British remove their troops
Stalin left 30,000 troops in the northern part of the country, claiming that they were needed to help put down internal rebellion
Unsurprising, these troops encouraged a Communist uprising
Iran asks US and Britain for help, seeing this as a breach of the wartime agreements
On January 1, 1946, Stalin refuses – wants access to Iranian oil
Four days later, in a letter to Secretary of State James Byrnes, Truman reveals that he thinks the Soviet Union will invade Turkey and the Black Sea Straits
“unless Russia is faced with an Iron Fist and strong language, war is in the making”
Iran had to make a formal protest to the UN concerning the continued presences of Soviet forces. This was the first crisis faced by the UN
Moscow agrees to pull its troops out
Instability and Communist Parties Elsewhere in Europe
Instability in Greece and Turkey
Post WWII, anti-imperialist, nationalist, and somewhat Pro-Communist rebellions in these countries
British, and to a slightly lesser degree the US, believed that these rebellions were being directed and supported by the Soviets.
Stalin does assert that he wants Soviet control of the Straits of Constantinople, rather than Turkish control of the area
Communist Parties in Italy and France
Grew stronger in post war Europe.
Membership increasing due to the economic hardships experience at the end of the war
Americans and British are worried that these parties are receiving encouragement from Moscow (not nearly as much as in Eastern Europe), and are worried that these countries could be weak links in anti-Communist Western Europe
Kennan’s Long Telegram
February of 1946, US diplomat in Moscow, George F. Kennan, sent a telegram to the US State Department on the nature of Soviet foreign policy and conduct
His views in this telegram, on the motives behind Soviet foreign policy, will have lasting influence on the State Department
Key idea: the Soviet system is buoyed by the “threat” of a “hostile” world outside its borders, and that the USSR was “fanatically and implacably hostile to the West: Impervious to the logic of reason Moscow [is] highly sensitive to the logic of force. For this reason it can easily withdraw – and usually does – when strong resistance is encountered at any point.”
Kennan is arguing:
The USSR’s view of the world was a traditional one of insecurity
The Soviets want to advances Muscovite Stalinist ideology (not simply Marxism)
The Soviet regime was cruel and repressive and justified this by perceiving nothing but evil in the outside world. That view of a hostile outside environment would sustain the internal Stalinist system
The USSR was fanatically hostile to the West – but it was not suicidal
Kennan’s logic of force argument helped harden attitudes in the US and helped play a key role in the development of the policy of containment
NV Novikov, Soviet Ambassador to the US
Sends telegram to Stalin in 1946, after the Kennan telegram
Set out concerns about US actions he saw as imperialist and thus a threat to Russia:
“The foreign policy of the United States, which reflects the imperialist tendencies of American monopolist capital, is characterized in the postwar period by a striving for world supremacy. This is the real meaning of the many statements by President Truman and other representatives of American ruling circles; that the United States has the right to lead the world. All the forces of American diplomacy – the army, the air force, the navy, industry, and science – are enlisted in the service of this foreign policy. For this purpose broad plans for expansion have been developed and are being implemented through diplomacy and the establishment of a system of naval and air bases stretching far beyond the boundaries of the United States, through the arms race, and through the creation of ever newer types of weapons.”
Kennan and Novikov’s telegrams indicate the suspicion that was emerging in both the United States and Soviet Russia
Basis for Iron Curtain Speech
By 1946, Soviet dominated governments in:
Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria
This was in spite of hopes at Yalta that there would be free and democratic elections in Eastern Europe post WWII
Communist regimes not tied to Moscow had also been established:
Albania, Yugoslavia
By 1949, communism had expanded to include:
East Germany and Czechoslovakia
Red army is still occupying much of Eastern Europe, and thus a cloak of secrecy descends upon Eastern Europe soon after the war
Soviet Reaction to Churchill’s Speech
Swift response: Outrage
Within a week, Stalin compares Churchill to Hitler
Saw the speech as racist and a call to war with the Soviet Union
USSR takes the following steps within 3 weeks of the speech:
They withdrew from the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
They stepped up the tone and intensity of anti-Western propaganda
They initiated a new five-year economic pan of self-strengthening
The iron curtain speech led to a further hardening of opinions on both sides. Churchill had publically defined the new front line in what was now being seen as a new war
The Truman Doctrine
Truman makes a key speech to the US Congress on March 12th, 1947.
Put forward the belief that the US had obligations to “support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures”
This becomes known as the “Truman Doctrine”
Culmination of shift in US foreign policy: isolationist to interventionist
Woodrow Wilson WWI – ran in 1914 on “he kept us out of war” then enters WWI on promise to “make the world safe for democracy”
Roosevelt – WWII lend-lease program
Truman doctrine is a response to unstable situations in Turkey and especially Greece
British had restored the Greek monarchy following WWII, but communist guerillas continued to resist in the countryside.
British could no longer support Greek government and army financially, as its own economy had been devastated by the war, and is roughly 3 billion pounds in debt
The Truman Doctrine
In February of 1947, British told the US that they could no longer maintain tropps in Greece
US cannot afford a potential Communist takeover
Greece is at a strategic location in Europe – gateway to Western Europe
US aid sent to Greece
Roughly 400 million dollars in financial aid
Military advisors are sent to Greece to help combat communists
Soviet perspective
Evidence of the determination of US to expand its sphere of influence
Soviets believe US involvement in Europe is not legitimate
Both the long telegram and iron curtain speech influence Truman before making his “doctrine”
Correct perception of expansionist threat of Soviets
Beginning of the policy of containment of Communism – will draw the US into the affairs of nations well beyond Europe
Political Historian Walter LaFeber
On the longer-term significance of the Truman Doctrine
“The Truman Doctrine was a milestone in American History … the doctrine became an ideological shield behind which the United States marched to rebuild the Western political and economic system and counter the radical left. From 1947 on, therefore, any threats to that Western system could be easily explained as Communist inspired, not as problems which arose from difficulties within the system itself. That was the most lasting and tragic result of the Truman Doctrine.”
America, Russia, and the Cold War, 5th ed. (Knopf, 1985) pp. 57-58
Directly for Greece and Turket, expansion into the Marshall plan and containment
The Marshall Plan
In January of 1947, Secretary of State James Byrnes resigned, and was replaced by General George Marshall.
Marshall believes that the economies of Western Europe needed immediate help from the USA
“Patient is sinking while the doctors deliberate”
Marshall plan – an economic extension of the ideas outline in the Truman Doctrine
The Marshall plan – Dollar Imperialism?
Designed to give immediate economic help to Europe
Set down strict criteria to qualify for American economic aid
Involved allowing the US to investigate the financial records of applicant counties
Stated aims of the Marshall Plan:
Revive European Economics so that political and social stability could ensue
Safeguard the future of the US economy
US wants to avoid the interpretation that they were coercing European governments to accept the plan, so it was made clear that the initiative had to come from Europe
The bill allocating the money did not pass Congress until March 1948
17 Billion dollars
Successfully passed after the Czech Coup in February of 1948
Marshall Plan Money
Yugoslavia 109 Million
Turkey 221 Million
Denmark 271 Million
Austria 677 Million
Netherlands 1.079 Billion
Italy 1.474 Billion
United Kingdom 3.176 Billion
France 2.706 Billion
West Germany 1.389 Billion
Greece 694 Million
Belgium/Luxembourg 556 Million
Norway 254 Million
Ireland 146 Million
Sweden 107 Million
Soviet Reaction and Response
Soviet Union Rejects the Marshall Plan – because Americans had asked to see recipients financial records
This is an example of American dollar imperials in Soviet minds
Marshall plan soon evolved into military alliances – LaFeber
Soviet Response
Molotov Plan
Series of bilateral trade agreements that aimed to ties the economies of Easter Europe to the USSR
Creation of COMECON in January of 1949 (Council for Mutual Economic Assistence)
Designed to stimulate and control their economic development and support the collectivization of agriculture and development of heavy industry
Cominform and the “two camps”
Cominform
Communist Information Bureau is created in 1947
Created as an instrument to increase Stalin’s control over the Communist parties of other countries
Initially comprised of communists in USSR, Yugoslavia, France, Italy, Poland, Bulgaria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and Romania
West is concerned that the organization would spread communism (thus destabilizing the democratic governments) in its own backyard (think France, Italy)
Stalin’s two camps doctrine
Idea developed by Stalin in 20s and 30s – dividing up Europe into opposing camps
The aftermath of WWII makes this a reality.
Stalin gives “two camps” speech in 1946 before Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech.
Two Camps idea is discussed at first Cominform meeting
One Camp: American organized “anti-Soviet” bloc which was influencing from Europe to Latin America to Asia
The other: USSR and “new democracies” in Eastern Europe
Also included countries the Soviets deemed sympathetic at the time: Indonesia, Vietnam, India, Egypt, and Syria
Red Army Occupation of Eastern Europe 1945-1947
Soviets control Eastern Europe by creating what is known as a “satellite empire.”
Countries keep their separate legal identities, keeping them technically separate from each other and Russia
However, they were tied to following Moscow by the following factors:
Soviet Military Power (eventually formalized in Warsaw Pact in 1955)
Salami tactics, which transferred the machinery of government into the hands of obedient, pro-Soviet Communists
State police and spy networks
COMECON
One Eastern European Country where salami tactics are slow going: Czechoslovakia
Stalin opts to set a coup in motion to speed up the process
By the end of 1948, the satellite states were economically and militarily controlled by the USSR
Western Allies saw the “occupation” of Eastern Europe as a direct breach fo the agreements made at Yalta and Potsdam, and as clear evidence of Soviet expansionist policies in action
The Czechoslovakian Coup, February 1948
Stalin is worried about Czechoslovakia receiving Marshall Plan aid
Country is considering it
The west, perhaps feeling guilty after the Munich Agreements in 1938, doesn’t want to abandon the Czechs again
Stalin organizes for pressure to be put on the Czech coalition government
12 non communist members are forced to resign
Communists Party leader demands the formation of a communist government
Under heavy pressure from Moscow, and loosely veiled threats of armed intervention, Czech President Edvard Benes agrees to terms
Two weeks later, independent Czech foreign Minister Jan Masaryk was found dead under suspicious circumstances
This is used as evidence by Truman against the Soviets, becomes the final push to get the Marshall Plan through congress
The X Article -- 1947
Written by George Kennan, under the pseudonym, Mr. X
Argued that the long-term policy of the United States towards the Soviet Union had to be that of containment of Soviet Expansion
The US should regard the Soviet Union as a “rival” not partner
Kennan was a strong influence on Truman and his reputation as the United States key expert on Soviet Policy gave him a tremendous amount of influence over the American public
Czech Coup happens months after publishing, shows evidence of dangers of Soviet Union
The Berlin Crisis of 1948 (THERE ARE TWO BERLIN CRISIS, THIS LEADS TO BERLIN AIRLIFT, THE ONE IN 1960 LEADS TO BERLIN WALL)
Post War Germany
Germany had been invaded on two major fronts, making it extremely difficult to leave it undivided during occupation at the conclusion of the war
Germany split into for zones, administered by the Allied Control Council (ACC)
Berlin, in the eastern portion of the country, was governed by the Allied Kommandantur, made up of four military governors
All of this was supposed to be temporary
It was the intention that all of Germany be treated as one economically, and that a German state would once again emerge as a state
By 1949, German was permanently divided into two separate states (eventually reunified)
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Germany’s key strategic position and the differing aims of the main powers
Center of Europe
Potential economic strength – had been an industrial power
USSR does not want to see a resurgent united Germany that would pose a security threat
But it does want to get as much reparations as possible out of Germany
France feared a united Germany rising again on its eastern boarder
USA thinks rapid economic recovery of Germany would be best for health of western Europe
Would contain spread of communism
British backed this view, although they were bankrupt post war
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
The increasing lack of trust between East and West as the Cold war developed
The differences in aims and attitudes of the allied powers had in 1945 would have been enough on their own to delay any permanent peace settlement for Germany
But mutual suspicions between the USSR and the West began to harden, making it more difficult
Both sides worry about Germany joining the “other side” and tipping the fragile balance of power
James Byrnes gives “Speech of Hope” promising that Germany would be rebuilt and would not be divided economically, and that Germans would be allowed to govern themselves democratically
He also commits US troops to Germany as long as there is an occupation
“to win the German people … it was a battle between us and Russia over minds…”
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Specific Disputes between the post-war powers within Germany itself
Economic conflict
Reparations are key
USSR was to take 25% of German industrial equipment from the Western Zones in return for supplying those zones with food and raw materials
This did not work
Food was a huge problem in war-torn Germany
Compounded by a swell of refugees from Eastern Europe
USSR was not delivering enough food to the Western zone
Also increasingly secretive about what is going on in their zone
USA and UK stopped supplying the Soviet zone
German coal was another area of disagreement
Soviets want western coal, Americans want to use this coal to assist in the economic recovery of Western Europe
25 million tons exported to Europe, not Soviets
In early 1947, British and US zones are merged into a new unit called Bizonia
Why did the post-war powers fail to unify Germany?
Specific Disputes between the post-war powers within Germany itself
Political Conflict
Stalin is planning as early as June 1945 to reunify Germany and incorporate it into Russia’s sphere of influence
Red army controlled Soviet zone, and Communist Party of Germany (KDP) would attempt to get popular support
First step, merge the Social Democrats in Soviet zone with KDP, creating the Socialist United Party (SED)
Party did not win over West Germans however
The London Conference of Ministers 1947
Should have considered the German peace treaty, ends in Soviets and the West throwing accusations at each other, showing that agreement was far from happening
London Conference 1948
France, Britain, US draw up a constitution for a new West Germany
Also establish a new currency
The Berlin Blockade, 1948
Stalin’s response to establishing a West German state and new currency
Berlin is 100 miles within the Soviet zone, sealed off from the rest of Germany
Thus West Germans in the zone received their food and energy supplies from the Western zone, delivered on road, rail and air corridors
Stalin begins a total blockade of these routes
Roads, railways and waterways linking West Berlin with West Germany were closed, cut supply of electricity from west German to West Berlin, and the USSR left the Berlin Kommandantur, having left the ACC in March of 48
West defeats the blockade by air not by direct military confrontation
British and American planes flew more than 200,000 flights in 320 days, delivering vital supplies of food and coal to 2.2 million West Berliner
By 1949, its clear this is working, Soviets end the blockade
Results of the Berlin Blockade
First time since 1945 that war had been a possibility
Blockade has significant impact on the development of the Cold War
Any agreement would be extremely difficult to come by
Three major outcomes
Germany is divided
West, 1948, Federal Republic of Germany (FRG)
East, 1949, German Democratic Republic (GDR)
For the West, a divided Germany protected by the US was preferable to a neutral united Germany
Continuation of four-power control in Berlin
Berlin remained a divided city
The formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
April 1949,
USA, Canada, Brussels Pact Powers (1948 -- Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg,), Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Portugal
Defensive alliance
In Paris Pact, West Germany is added to NATO in 1955
Soviets respond w/ Warsaw Pact
Brings all of Eastern Europe under one military command
Conclusions that can be drawn: Europe 1949
Europe was now clearly divided along political, economic, and military lines
Germany was not to be reunited as had been an original aim of the Allies at the end of World War II. There were now two clear states, although neither side was prepared to recognize the existence of the other (until the 1970s)
The USA had abandoned its peacetime policy of avoiding commitments and was now involved economically (Marshall Plan) and militarily (NATO)
No peace treaty had actually been signed with Germany, which meant that the boarders of central Europe were not formalized. This was particularly worrying for Poland, as it now included territory taken from Germany in 1945 (not resolved until 1975)
Western countries had developed a greater sense of unity due to the Soviet threat
International Relations Beyond Europe?
From this time on, many conflicts, wherever they were in the world, would be seen as part of the struggle between Communism and Capitalism
The USA’s policy of containment, which had been developed to fight Communism in Europe, was to lead the USA into resisting Communism anywhere in the world that it perceived Communism was a threat. This would involve the USA fighting in both the Korean and Vietnam War
The United Nations was never to play the role envisioned in the original discussions between Roosevelt and Churchill at the time of its foundation. With the USA and the USSR now opposing each other and able to use their respective vetoes, the UN could not act effectively to resolve international conflicts.
Breakdown of the Grand Alliance - Steps to the political, economic and Military Division of Europe
Causation and Change
In 1945, American and Soviet Soldiers met at the River Elbe
Signified the final defeat of Germany, due to the successful collaboration between the USA and the Allies in the Grand Alliance
By 1949 however, Europe has been divided into two separate “spheres of influence”
In September of 1949, following the Berlin Blockade, the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) or West Germany was established
By October of 1949, the German Democratic Republic (GDR), or East Germany is established
This physical divide of Germany was a symbol of the divide in Europe to come
Breakdown of the Grand Alliance
When Germany attacked Russia in June of 1941, both British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and American President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent aid to the Soviets
Marks beginning of Grand Alliance
Churchill and the British, despite sending aid, still have highly unfavorable views of the Soviet State
“If Hitler invaded Hell, I would make at least favorable reference to the Devil in the House of Commons”
Still mutual suspicion
“an enemy of my enemy is my friend” applies to the relationship
Stalin wants more than the aid he is receiving – demands that the allies open up a second front to the war to deflect some of the pressure the Soviets are under
Allies agreed to this in principle, after all France was under occupation and the British were under bombardment, but said they were waiting for the right opportunity
This increases Stalin’s suspicion of the Allies – believes they are allowing Germany to weaken the USSR permanently
The Wartime Conferences
During the war, the decisions of the Grand Alliance determined the territorial and political structure of post war Europe.
Three major conferences: Tehran, Yalta, Potsdam
Key issues discussed at these Conferences
The state of the war
The status of Germany, Poland, Eastern Europe, and Japan
The United nations
The Tehran Conference
First Major Conference, held in Tehran Iran – November 1943
Leaders present: Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill
The State of the War
Allies were beginning turn the fight around, pushing the Germans back from North Africa and had invaded Italy
Soviets were pushing the Germans into retreat on the Eastern front
British and Americans had not launched a second front yet in Stalin’s eyes
Continues to press that the allies invade northwestern Europe
Early discussions on Japan start, US has begun its Island hopping strategy
The Tehran Conference: Germany
Question is raised – what to do with Germany post defeat
Divide between Stalin and Allies
Allies are looking to learn from Treaty of Versailles failures
Too punishing of Germany – leading to Hitler’s rise
Stalin is less forgiving
One major agreement: “unconditional surrender” of Germany was the objective
Roosevelt does believe that Operation Overlord – the allied invasion of northern France that would eventually begin June 6th 1944– was a priority
Tehran Conference: Poland
Stalin’s main concern: “security” – which influences his demands over the future of Germany, but also thus shapes his concerns over the shape of Poland’s post war boarders.
Stalin wants to secure his western boarder by taking land from Poland
Wants a pro-soviet government installed in Poland
Claims that historically, Poland had been a launching pad to the invasion of Russia
Thus it was agreed to that USSR was to keep territory seized in 1939 and Poland would be given territory on its western boarder with Germany
No independent Poland would agree to this – ensuring hostilities in the future between Poland and Germany
Made it likely that a puppet regime would have to be installed, and it would have to look to the USSR for security
Tensions between Pole and Soviets increased in 1943, when a mass grave of 10,000 Polish officers was discovered in the Katyn Forest. Though the Soviets blamed the Germans, many Poles rightly suspected that this had been committed by the Soviets
Tehran Conference: Eastern Europe
Soviets demanded the right to keep the territories that they had seized between 1939 and 1940, giving them control of the Baltic States and parts of Finland and Romania
Americans and British reluctantly agreed to allow it
Goes against the Atlantic Charter agreement between the United States and Britain
The Charter they drafted included eight “common principles” that the United States and Great Britain would be committed to supporting in the postwar world. Both countries agreed not to seek territorial expansion; to seek the liberalization of international trade; to establish freedom of the seas, and international labor, economic, and welfare standards.
Tehran Conference: Japan and UN
Japan
United States and Britain pressed the USSR to enter the war with Japan
Stalin says no until Germany has been stopped
The United Nations
British and Soviets give general approval of the idea of such an organization
Settle international disputes though collect security
Tehran overall:
Agreement on a new international organization
Agreement on the need weak post-war Germany
Roosevelt: “I got along fine with Marshal Stalin… I believe that we are going to get along very well with him and the Russian People…”
However, there is a growing gap between Soviet post war goals and Churchill
Roosevelt even assures Polish that Stalin is not imperialist
The Yalta Conference
By the time of February 1945 Yalta Conference on the Black Sea in Russia Stalin’s diplomatic position is greatly strengthened
Red Armies control most of Eastern Europe
Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill represent the big powers
Yalta: the State of the War
Germany is on the verge of defeat
Normandy landings in 1944 – second war front has been opened
British and Americans had forced the Germans from France, poised to cross the Rhine and invade Germany from the West
Soviets are ready to invade Germany from the East
Japan
Still fighting on, but are under heavy aerial bombardment from the Americans
USA is in control or Air and Sea in the Pacific
Japan is preparing for final defense of the homeland
Yalta Conference: Germany
Allies decide that Germany would be disarmed, demilitarized, de-Nazified, and divided
Four Zones of Occupation: USA, USSR, Britain, France would each control a portion
Divisions would be temporary and Germany was to be run as one country
Allied Control Council (ACC) would be set up to govern Germany
Stalin demands reparations
It was agreed Germany would pay 20 Billion, with half going to USSR
Yalta Conference: Poland
Biggest issue: boarders of Poland
Boarder between USSR and Poland would be drawn at the Curzon Line
Puts boundary to what it had been before the Russo-Polish War of 1921.
Poland would be compensated by gaining back territory taken by Germany
Land east of the Oder-Neisse Line
Thus Stalin gets what he wants in terms of boundaries
Establishment of Polish Government
British support the London Poles, pre-war government that had fled in 1939
Soviets want Communist Lublin Committee in Poland to form the new government
Katyn Forrest massacre and failure of Soviets to back Polish in Warsaw Uprising – specifically those who followed the London Poles
Yalta Conference: Eastern Europe and Japan
There is agreement over the future nature of governments in Eastern Europe
Stalin agrees that Eastern Europe would be able to have free elections
Perceived at the time as a major victory for Britain and US
Japan
Stalin promised to enter the war against Japan as soon as the war in Europe drew to a close
Demanded territory as a reward: South Sakhalin and Kuril Islands.
Terms accepted by Roosevelt and Stalin
Yalta Conference: United Nations
Stalin agreed that the Soviet Union would join the UN organization
Allies agree to five permanent members of the Security Council, each with veto power: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States
Stalin wants all 16 Soviet Republics to have seats in the UN General Assembly
British and USA agreed in the end to only Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
Three main positive outcomes of Yalta:
Agreement on UN
Soviet agreement to join the war with Japan
The Big Three signing a “Declaration on Liberated Europe” pledging for free elections in all European Countries, including those in Eastern Europe
Crucial Developments between Yalta and Potsdam Conferences
President Roosevelt died in April 1945, and was replaced by Truman, who was to adopt a more hardline approach towards the Soviets
Germany finally surrendered unconditionally on May 7th, 1945
Winston Churchill’s conservative party lost the July 1945 general election, and Churchill was succeeded as prime minister by Labour Party leader, Clement Attlee
As the war in Europe ended, the Soviet Red Army occupied territory as far west as deep inside Germany
On July 17, 1945, the day after Potsdam begins, the US successfully tested its first atomic bomb
Potsdam Conference
State of the War
May of 1945 Germany surrendered unconditionally
America is poised to invade Japan, planning on using its new Atomic Weapon
Germany
Yalta plans being put into effect
Economy was run as a “whole” but this was limited to domestic industry and agriculture (74% of 1936 capacity)
Soviets received 25% of their reparation bill from Western zones, Eastern Germany would trade them food
Poland
Truman is not happy with Yalta agreement, tried to challenge the Oder-Neisse Line
Truman wants government re-organized
Unhappy with Lublin-Dominated government, does not think that Stalin including London Poles in elections is satisfactory enough
Eastern Europe
US unhappy with British and Soviet Percentages Agreement
Percentages gave spheres of influence power in fate of Eastern European Europe and Southern Europe: EX: Romania – Russia 90% influence, 10% other, Greece UK 90%, Russia 10%, Yugoslavia 50-50, Hungary 50-50, Bulgaria Russia 75, others 25
Did not like control Russia got over Bulgaria and Romania
However, the Red Army control Eastern Europe, so it was hard to get Stalin to budge here
Japan
Others told of the bomb, which was first used on Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945.
Three days later, second bomb is dropped on Nagasaki
Unconditional surrender is announced on September 2nd.
Truman hid details of the super weapon from Stalin
Americans did not encourage Soviet participation in war against Japanese
United Nations
Created, became a reality when chartered in San Francisco in 1945
Stalin would use veto power on anything not deemed to be in Soviet Interest
PAPER TWO UNITS START The Cold War - Signifcance and Causation
The Emergence of Superpowers
Following the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945 at the end of World War II, two competing Superpowers emerge:
United States
Union of Soviet Socialists Republics (USSR)
In 1945, many expected this to evolve into a traditional rivalry, one that could lead to an armed conflict.
Instead, rapid escalation of nuclear armament by both countries makes the results of direct conflict unthinkable.
This leads to 45 years of ideological conflict, a conventional and nuclear arms race, and wars fought by proxy on the battlefields of Asia, Africa and Latin America
Leads to economic rivalry, and the development of huge spy networks as each side tried to discover the other’s military and strategic secrets
The Cold War
Fun Fact: American Journalist Walter Lippman, writing for the New York Herald Tribune in 1947 who popularized the term “Cold War”
Harry Truman preferred the phrase “the war of nerves”
Opposing Ideologies
Part of what made the Cold War so intense was that both of these Superpowers had fundamental differences in ideology
Made for natural, if not inevitable enemies.
The Bolshevek Revolution in Russia in 1917, saw Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party establish the world’s first Communist State, based on the ideas of 19th century economic philosopher Karl Marx
These ideas seemed to threaten basis of American and Western Society
America (and the “West”)
Economic Differences
Individuals should be able to compete with each other with a minimum of state interference and make as much money as they wish
Capitalism
Individuals are thus encouraged to work hard with the promise of individual reward
Political Differences
Individuals choose the government through voting. There is a range of political parties to choose from
Individuals have certain rights, such as freedom of the press
Liberal Democracy
USSR
Economic Differences
Capitalism creates divisions between rich and poor. Thus all businesses and farms should be owned by the state on behalf of the people
Communism
Goods will be distributed to individuals by the state. Everyone will thus get what is needed and everyone will be working for the collective good
Political Differences
There is no need for a range of political parties, as the Communist Party truly represents the views of all of the workers and rules on behalf of the people.
Individual freedoms valued by the west are not necessary
This is a one party state
Increasing Hostility Leading into World War II
There is mutual suspicion between the West and the USSR that manifests itself in various ways between the Bolshevik Revolution and the start of World War II
Russian Civil War 1918-1922
Estimated 7,000,000–12,000,000 casualties during the war, mostly civilians.
Red army is triumphant (Bolshevism – Russian form of Communism)
West had given support to the Conservative forces – the white army – which was a hodge-podge of anti-communist beliefs (favoring monarchism, capitalism and alternative forms of socialism, each with democratic and antidemocratic variants)
rival militant socialists and nonideological Green armies fought against both the Bolsheviks and the Whites
Eight nations – mainly Allies from WWI, and pro- German forces, helped against the Red Army, but without success
USSR does not receive diplomatic recognition or join the League of Nations until 1934
Hilter is appeased leading into World War II in part because of fear of Soviet Communism, which at the time was more feared than German Facism
The Non-Aggression Pact (Soviet-Nazi Pact) between USSR and Nazi Germany, signed in 1939, allowed Hitler to concentrate on attacking the West, increases tension between USSR and the rest of the West
Idealism v. Self Interest: What ideals underpinned the view of each country/ How was this achieved by each country?
USA
Idealism of Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt
Struggle for a better world based on collective security, political self-determination, and economic integration
Peace freedom, justice and plenty
Achieved by democracy/Capitalism and international co-operation
USSR
Marxist idealism and Stalinism
Struggle for a better world based on international socialism
Peace, freedom, justice, and plenty
Achieved by spreading Soviet- style communism
Idealism v. Self-Interest: Which Elements of self-interest lay behind each country’s ideals
USA
The need to establish markets and open doors to FREE TRADE
The desire to avoid another economic crisis of the magnitude of 1929
President Truman and most of the post war US administration’s belief that what was good for America was good for the world
USSR
The need to secure boarders
The need to recover from the effects of World War II
The need to regain strength as the nursery of Communism
Stalin’s belief that what was good for the USSR was good for the workers of the world
Significance of Stalinism
Stalin takes over leadership of the Soviet Union after the death of Lenin
Becomes the sole leader by the late 1920s
Stalin’s Policies
Collectivization of all farms
Leads to the death of millions of agricultural workers
Five-year plans
Industry: dramatically increase production, put USSR in a position to defeat the Nazi’s by 1945
Great Terror
Purges of all political opponents as well as millions of ordinary people
Gulag’s – slave labor camps
Executions
By 1945, Stalinism means:
Dominance of Stalin over the party, and the party over state institutions
A powerful state machinery
The ruthless maintenance of power by the elimination of opposing leaders, groups or entire sections of the population
The development of a regime associate with paranoia and violence
Stalin’s role in World War II
Stalin had hoped that engagement with Hitler could be delayed by the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939
Nazi Germany, which had not yet defeated the British in 1941, decided they can no longer wait to engage the Soviet Union
Operation Barbarossa
Red Army is ill prepared for war, many military leaders had not survived Stalin’s purges
Ukraine is quickly overrun
German Army besieged Leningrad and reached the outskirts of Moscow
Winter in Russia devastates the underprepared Germans
Soviet’s win at Stalingrad, start pushing Nazi’s back to Germany
Overall, Stalin plays a key role in defeating the Nazis
Made him more secure and powerful in the Soviet Union, and also puts the Soviet Union in a strong position to emerge as one of the leading powers of the post war world
General Costs of World War II
20 Million people were displaced in World War II
Europe: 23% of farmland could not be used for food production, severe crisis in 1946-47
USSR: 1,700 towns, 31,000 factories, 100,000 state farms destroyed
USSR: 25-27 Million Deaths
China: 10 million deaths
Japan: 2 Million deaths
Australia and New Zealand Deaths: roughly 50,000
Poland: 6 million deaths
Germany: 7 million deaths
France: 600,000 deaths
Great Britain: 357,000 deaths
Italy: 500,000 deaths
USA: GDP Doubles by 1944
400,000 deaths
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Military Reasons
To defeat Germany, USA had become the number one air force power in the world
To defeat Germany, USSR had become the number one land force power in the world
France’s and Britain’s inability to defeat Germany had changed the balance of power – they are now “second tier”
The USSR now lacked any strong military neighbors. This made it the regional power
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Economic Reason
The USA’s economy was strengthened by the war. It was now able to out-produce the other powers put together
The USA was committed to more “open trade” Its politicians and businesspeople wanted to ensure liberal trade, and market competition flourished. The United States was willing to play an active role in avoiding the re-emergence of the disastrous pre-war pattern of trade blocs and tariffs
The USA had the economic strength to prevent a return to instability in Europe
The small Eastern European countries that had been created after World War One were not economically viable on their own, so they needed the support of a stronger neighbor, and the USSR could replace Germany in this role
Why Does the USA and USSR Emerge as Superpowers after 1945: Political Reasons
For the West, the outcome of World War Two showed that the ideals of democracy and international collaboration had triumphed over fascism. Thus the political system of the USA was the right path for the future
For the Soviet Union, it was Communism that had triumphed over fascism. Indeed Communism had gained widespread respect in Europe because of its part in resisting the Germans
The USSR had huge losses, and the role of the Red Army in defeating the Nazis, gave Stalin a claim to great influence in forming the post-war world.
The USSR had the political and military strength to prevent a return to instability in Eastern Europe. Communism could fill the political vacuum
The alliance that existed between the United States and the USSR to defeat Germany completely collapses by 1949.
Key Political Definitions
Liberalism
Liberals put their main emphasis on the freedom of the individual
Economically they believe in minimal interference by the state.
Foreign policy: promote the ideas of free trade and cooperation
Strong beliefs in:
Civil liberties (freedom of conscience, freedom of speech)
Universal suffrage
Parliamentary constitutional government
An independent judiciary
Diplomacy rather than force in relations between states
Fascism
This ideology is rooted in ideas that are the very opposite of liberalism
Limiting individual freedoms in the interest of the state
Extreme nationalism
Use of violence to achieve ends
Keeping power in the hands of an elite group or leader
An aggressive foreign policy
Socialism
Ideology developed in the early 19th century in the context of the Industrial Revolution
Socialists believe:
A more egalitarian social system
Governments providing for the more needy members of society
International cooperation and solidarity
Conservatism
The general implication is a belief in maintaining the existing or traditional order
Respect for traditional institutions
Limiting government intervention in people’s lives
Gradual and/or limited changes in the established order
Right Wing v. Left Wing
Right: describes groups who favor free-market capitalism and place an emphasis on law and order, limited state interference and traditional societal values
Left: describes those groups who favor more equality in society, and thus more government intervention in the economy to secure this situation