Measures of Stress
Biological Measures of Stress
1. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Definition: fMRI measures brain activity by tracking the flow of oxygenated blood. Increased blood flow indicates higher activity in the brain areas.
Application: Used for assessing stress responses during cognitively demanding and stress-inducing tasks.
Active Areas: Typically includes the amygdala, hippocampus, and hypothalamus.
Example Study: Wang et al (2005)
Aim: To explore how cerebral blood flow changes under stress during mathematical tasks.
Procedure:
32 participants were split into stress (25) and control (7) conditions.
Participants completed a high-stress mental arithmetic task while in an fMRI scanner, preceded by a low-stress task (counting backwards from 1000).
Self-reports of stress and saliva samples for cortisol measurement were collected after each task.
Results:
Regression analyses showed that psychological stress correlates with activation in specific brain regions, notably the ventral right pre-frontal cortex.
Conclusion: The study signifies the ability to utilize physiological measures in understanding stress responses based on cognitive challenges.
2. Salivary Cortisol
Definition: Cortisol is a primary stress hormone that can be measured in saliva, indicating levels of physiological stress.
Example Study: Evans and Wener (2007)
Aim: To assess coping stress levels during commutes by measuring cortisol levels.
Procedure:
139 urban train commuters were monitored during rush hour, measuring cortisol levels at different time points to evaluate stress.
Investigated both the distal crowding (whole carriage density) and proximal crowding (immediate seating).
Results:
Proximal crowding significantly affected cortisol levels and mood, but distal crowding did not.
Conclusion: Proximal crowding leads to greater individual stress effects than overall density; personal space invasions are more impactful than general crowding.
Psychological Measures of Stress
1. Demand-Control Model
Tasks that require high mental arousal can increase stress, especially when the control over these demands is low.
Self-Report Questionnaires:
Friedman and Rosenman Personality Test
Holmes and Rahe's Life Events Questionnaire
2. SRRS - Holmes & Rahe (1967)
Definition: 43 life events are significant occurrences that disrupt day-to-day activities, influencing stress levels.
Procedure:
SRRS Development: Based on interviews of 384 individuals, 43 life events were ranked from most to least stressful.
Measurement: Experiencers quantified their life events for a retrospective 12-month period. Scores over 150 units correlate to increasing chances of stress-related illnesses.
Results:
Individuals with numerous life changes faced higher illness probabilities:
< 150 LCUs: 30% chance
150-299 LCUs: 50% chance
300 LCUs: 80% chance
Conclusion: High life change units correlate positively with health complications due to stress.
Personality and Stress Responses
Example Study: Friedman and Rosenman (1974)
Aim: Investigate links between Type A behaviour and cardiovascular disease.
Procedure: 3000 Californian men categorised as Type A or Type B, followed for 8.5 years.
Results: 70% of those developing CHD were Type A; implies they are more prone to stress-related ailments.
Conclusion: Type A behaviours increase vulnerability to stress-related illnesses due to factors like hostility and impatience.
Evaluation of Measures
Biological Measures
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Strengths:
Provides real-time images of brain activity during stress-inducing tasks.
Allows for the identification of specific brain regions associated with stress responses (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus).
Objective measurement of physiological reactions to stress.
Weaknesses:
Expensive and requires specialized equipment.
Results can be influenced by external factors and individual differences.
Limited to understanding brain activity and may not account for other physiological changes.
Salivary Cortisol
Strengths:
Non-invasive method of measuring stress hormone levels.
Directly correlates with physiological stress responses.
Useful in real-life settings (e.g., during commutes).
Weaknesses:
Cortisol levels can fluctuate due to various factors unrelated to stress (e.g., time of day, illness).
May not capture the full complexity of an individual's stress experience.
Psychological Measures
Demand-Control Model
Strengths:
Helps to explain the relationship between work stress and control over demands.
Highlights the importance of perceived control in managing stress levels.
Weaknesses:
Lacks objective measures and relies heavily on self-reported data.
Subjective interpretations of demands and control can vary between individuals.
Life Events - Holmes & Rahe (1967)
Strengths:
Provides a framework for understanding how major life changes impact health.
Empirical basis with quantitative scoring system (LCUs).
Weaknesses:
May oversimplify stress responses by focusing on life events without considering context or individual differences.
Retrospective nature may lead to recall bias.
Friedman and Rosenman Personality Test
Strengths:
Links personality types to stress vulnerability, aiding in counselling and interventions.
Validates the impact of personality on health outcomes.
Weaknesses:
Typing individuals as Type A or Type B may overlook complexities of personality.
Potential stigma against individuals deemed Type A as more aggressive or hostile.