Focus on three key questions regarding the Fed's influence on Aggregate Demand (AD):
When should the Fed intervene to influence AD?
When is the Fed capable of influencing AD?
When will this influence lead to increased GDP growth?
Best Case Definition: Clear guidelines for Fed's actions, but challenges exist.
Negative Shock Example:
Description: Shock to AD driven by "animal spirits" (emotions such as fear).
Scenario: Economy growing at 3%, inflation at 7%.
Consumers become pessimistic:
Result: Decreased borrowing and spending.
Consequence: Shift of AD to the left leading to a decline in output growth.
Inflation Rate () and GDP Growth Rates with changes in Monetary Policy:
Initial Conditions:
AD driven by (M + v) = 10%
After Shock: (M + v) = 5%
Policies:
Fed increases money supply (M) to boost AD and real GDP growth.
Economic Recovery:
Eventually, fear subsides; economy returns to steady state growth.
Intermediate phase: rampant slow growth and increased unemployment, potentially recessionary.
Monetary Policy Tools:
Increase growth rate of the money supply.
Reduce interest rates to stimulate borrowing.
Monetary Shift Outcomes:
Shift up and right in AD curve leads to higher inflation and GDP growth.
Considerations:
The Fed operates in real-time with limited data.
Control over money supply is often incomplete due to uncertain lags (typically between 6-18 months).
Impact of Money Supply Changes:
Changes in the money supply can be influenced by monetary multiplier effect.
Equation: \Delta MS = \Delta MB \times MM
Historical Example (1970s):
Fed overstimulation led to an inflation spike (13.5% in 1980), followed by a severe recession (unemployment peak >10%).
Disinflation Strategy:
Must be credible; workers need to anticipate slower wage growth to minimize layoffs.
Importance of Market Confidence:
Fear and expectations significantly influence AD.
Fed's capacity to stabilize expectations can prevent recessions.
911 Response:
Post-terrorist attack confidence impacted investments, leading Fed to provide $45.5 billion in liquidity to stabilize markets.
Impact of Negative Real Shock:
Shift of Long-Run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) causes inflation to rise and GDP growth to drop.
Policy Choices:
Decreasing M lowers inflation but further reduces GDP.
Increasing M raises GDP slightly but exacerbates inflation.
Conclusion: Fed struggles to achieve dual mandate during negative real shocks.
Fed's low Federal Funds rate (1% till 2004) promoted cheap credit, leading to housing bubble.
Consequence: subsequent real estate crash led to financial market distress.
Challenges of Policy Adjustment:
Speculative bubbles are hard to identify and monetary policy uniformly affects the economy.
Regulatory Solutions:
Fed could have regulated bank lending better to avoid bubble conditions.
Monetary Adjustment Conundrum:
Uncertainty about whether adjustments effectively reduce output volatility.
Some advocate for strict monetary rules to guide policy without reacting to each shock.
Nominal GDP Rule Proposition:
Maintain a stable growth path for MV (money supply times velocity) to stabilize economic performance.