CHAPTER 4 CP

Foundations of Stop and Frisk

  • A stop and frisk provides the legal framework for brief investigative detentions that are less intrusive than a full custodial arrest.

  • The foundational legal authority for investigative field stops is established in Terry versus Ohio.

  • Governed primarily by the Fourth Amendment Reasonableness Clause, which regulates searches and seizures.

  • Key Constitutional Amendments in criminal procedure:

    • Fourth Amendment: Governs searches, seizures, and investigative stops.

    • Fifth Amendment: Governs Miranda warnings, interrogations, grand juries, self-incrimination, and equal protection.

    • Sixth Amendment: Guarantees the right to counsel.

    • Eighth Amendment: Prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

    • Fourteenth Amendment: Ensures due process and equal protection against unlawful discrimination.

  • Field interrogations are recognized as essential tools for detecting and investigating street crimes without triggering immediate custodial arrests or Miranda warnings.

Reasonable Suspicion Standard and Factors

  • Reasonable suspicion is defined as a reasonable articulable suspicion based on objective facts, distinct from an unarticulated hunch or whim.

  • Functions as a balancing test between the need for swift law enforcement action to investigate crime and the modest intrusion on individual privacy.

  • Evaluated under an objective standard: whether facts available to an officer at the moment of seizure warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe the action taken was appropriate.

  • Key factors establishing reasonable suspicion under the totality of circumstances:

    • Type of criminal activity, time, and location.

    • Suspect's criminal record or known involvement in illegal activity.

    • Evasive maneuvers, uncooperativeness, nervousness, shakiness, or sweating.

    • Police officer experience and specialized training.

  • In Terry versus Ohio, Justice Warren emphasized that an officer with 30 years experience observing suspicious behavior was justified in investigating based on the totality of circumstances.

Mechanics and Limits of a Terry Stop

  • An investigative stop and a frisk are legally separate procedures requiring distinct legal justification:

    • Investigative Stop: A brief detention requiring reasonable suspicion that an individual has committed or is about to commit a crime.

    • Frisk: A brief pat-down of outer clothing for weapons intended solely for officer safety, requiring independent reasonable suspicion that the individual is armed and dangerous.

  • Legal Seizure Doctrines:

    • Plain Feel Doctrine: Contraband felt during a frisk may be seized without a warrant only if its illegal identity is immediately apparent without manipulation (Minnesota versus Dickerson).

    • Plain Sight Doctrine: Allows seizure of weapons or contraband coming into plain view during a lawful stop or frisk.

  • Constitutional Limitations on Terry Stops:

    • Duration: Must be brief (often referenced around a 20 minute guideline) and no longer than necessary to confirm or dispel suspicion.

    • Movement: Involuntary, significant movement of a suspect is prohibited unless required for safety and security reasons.

    • Techniques: Must utilize the least intrusive means reasonably available.

Informants and Profiling in Establishing Suspicion

  • Informant Tips: Reasonable suspicion can rely on direct observation or secondhand hearsay information (informants, victims, eyewitnesses, dispatch bulletins).

    • Adams versus Williams: Upheld reliance on a tip from a credible informant carrying sufficient indicia of reliability.

    • Alabama versus White: Established that an anonymous tip corroborated with indicia of reliability can provide reasonable suspicion.

    • Navarret or Navretti maybe versus California: Addressed specific circumstances under which anonymous tips satisfy reasonable suspicion standards.

    • Factors evaluating tips include informant reliability, basis of knowledge, police corroboration, contemporaneous reporting, and ongoing dangerous acts.

  • Drug Courier Profiles and Criminal Interdiction:

    • Profiles are based on behavioral analyses of past arrestees.

    • Matching a profile alone without individualized suspicious conduct is insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion (Reed versus Georgia).

  • Racial Profiling Prohibition:

    • Sole reliance on race, ethnicity, or gender to initiate a stop violates Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment protections.

    • Demographic characteristics may only be considered when tied to a specific, relevant suspect description connected to a crime.

Traffic Stops and Automobile Terry Searches

  • Vehicle traffic stops function as investigative detentions under Terry versus Ohio principles.

  • Expanding the scope or duration of a traffic stop requires independent reasonable suspicion (such as required under Minnesota law).

  • Officers may order drivers or passengers out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop based on jurisdiction rules and officer safety needs.

  • Passenger compartments may be searched for weapons if reasonable suspicion exists that occupants could immediately gain control of weapons.