Introduction to the Challenges of Studying the Social World
Discussion begins with the difficulties in scientifically studying the social world compared to physical objects.
Highlights the differences in the measurement and conceptualization of social phenomena.
Example: Measuring physical characteristics (e.g., height, weight) is straightforward and agreed upon.
Conceptualizing and Measuring Social Phenomena
The challenges arise in defining concepts such as poverty, inequality, and development.
Different methodologies exist for measuring social phenomena, with no single approach dominating as more accurate.
Importance of understanding that different conceptualizations can yield different answers.
Focus on Poverty
Defining Poverty
Poverty is complex and varies based on how it is defined and measured.
Essential to engage with the concept of how poverty is defined by different organizations.
The World Bank's Definition of Poverty
The World Bank views poverty as an absolute concept.
Defined in terms of basic consumption needs essential for survival (food, water, shelter).
Establishes a monetary line for poverty measurement.
As of 2025, the extreme poverty line is established at:
$3 per day in purchasing power parity (PPP terms).
Individuals consuming less than $3 are considered extremely poor.
This method is designed for international comparison across countries and over time.
World Bank counts the number of people in each country below this threshold to provide a global total.
Measuring Global Poverty Trends
Discussion of the global trends from 1990 to 2024 regarding extreme poverty:
Hypothetical show of hands in class on whether extreme poverty has increased or decreased reveals mixed opinions.
The expectation sets up for data-driven results.
Key statistics:
In 1990, approximately $2.3 billion people lived on less than $3 a day.
By 2024, that number is reduced to about $839 million.
Ultimate key finding:
Decrease of 1.46 billion people in extreme poverty is significant.
Proportionally, the world's population also shows change:
In 1990, 44% of the global population lived on less than $3 a day.
By 2024, it decreases to 10.31%.
Implication is that globalization may be a contributing factor to this reduction in extreme poverty.
Poverty in Canada
Application of the World Bank's Metrics
Investigates the implications of using the World Bank's metric within Canada.
Extreme poverty in Canada would be defined under the same $3 per day metric.
Statistics reveal that only 0.25% of Canadians (approximately 100,000 people) would be classified as extremely poor by this definition.
Actual Poverty Statistics in Canada
Statistics Canada provides alternative data suggesting:
In 2020, 3.2 million Canadians were identified as living in poverty (including 560,000 children).
By 2023, an estimated 10.9% of Canadians (around 4 million people) are living below the poverty line.
Discrepancy Between Definitions
Analysis reveals:
The World Bank conceptualizes poverty based on absolute needs.
Statistics Canada utilizes a relative measure involving a basic standard of living approach.
Definition by Statistics Canada
A family is considered to be living in poverty if they cannot afford a threshold of a specific basket of goods and services,
This basket includes expenditure categories such as food, clothing, transport, shelter, etc.
The poverty threshold for a family of four in Hamilton m is established at:
$57,534.
Key takeaway:
Different operational definitions lead to variable poverty statistics across contexts, highlighting the non-uniform nature of poverty measurement.
Adjusted Poverty Lines and Global Trends
Examining Poverty Lines
The World Bank also evaluates other extreme poverty lines to consider a broader perspective on poverty:
$4.20 per day raises the number of individuals classified as poor to 1.51 billion (approx. 18.92% of the population).
$8.30 per day increases it to 3.74 billion individuals (approx. 46.28% of the global population).
Understanding that poverty definitions greatly influence the outcomes, deriving conclusions can be challenging depending on the established thresholds.
Conclusion on Global Poverty and Inequality
The discussion emphasizes the continuous need to reassess and critically analyze how measures of poverty and economic conditions are applied globally.
Inequality, though related, is a separate concept that requires distinct scrutiny and cannot merely be conflated with poverty.