(Queer) Family Values and "Reciprocal IVF": Summary

Article Overview

  • Title: (Queer) Family Values and "Reciprocal IVF"

  • Author: Amanda Roth

  • Published in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Volume 27, Number 3 (2017)

Abstract Highlights

  • Focus on "Reciprocal IVF" (R-IVF) within female–female couples.

  • Examines the role of sexual identity in bioethical evaluations of R-IVF.

  • Past literature considers sexual identity largely irrelevant to bioethical discussions.

  • Suggests that the meaning of R-IVF for the queer community should be prioritized.

Key Arguments

  • Moral Permissibility of R-IVF:

    • Traditional discussions defend R-IVF by drawing parallels with heterosexual IVF usage.

    • Challenges the notion that sexual identity is a non-factor in ethical evaluations.

  • Queer Family Values:

    • Evaluates R-IVF through three specific queer family values:

    1. DIY Approach: Preference for non-medicalized, self-managed reproductive methods.

    2. Anti-bionormativity: Resistance to the idea that biological connection is paramount in family-making.

    3. Parental Egalitarianism: Emphasis on equitable parental roles and responsibilities.

  • Disease and Risk Analysis:

    • Discusses concerns about the safety and appropriateness of R-IVF versus traditional or elective uses of IVF.

    • Asks whether R-IVF might reinforce traditional family structures and norms.

Conclusions

  • Calls for critical reflection on R-IVF's implications for the queer community.

  • Highlighted that while R-IVF might provide legal and emotional benefits, it risks reestablishing bionormativity and traditional family paradigms.

  • Urges ongoing consideration of how sexual identity influences bioethics beyond the scope of mere permissibility or legality.