CAIE AS Level Psychology - Key Notes on Approaches
Biological Approach
1.1 Introduction
Main Assumptions:
Behavior, cognition, and emotions can be explained by:
Brain functions
Hormonal effects
Genetics
Evolutionary perspectives
Biological factors interact with other influences to create similarities and differences among individuals.
1.2 Dement and Kleitman (Sleep and Dreams)
Study Title: The Relation of Eye Movements During Sleep to Dream Activity: An Objective Method for the Study of Dreaming (1957)
Psychology Investigated: Understanding of REM (Rapid Eye Movement) and nREM sleep stages, and their correlation with dream activity.
Key Concepts:
Sleep Stages: Two types:
REM: Characterized by rapid eye movements; associated with vivid dreams.
nREM: Divided into 4 stages; less vivid; no eye movements occur.
Ultradian Rhythms: Basic cycles of activity (about every 90 minutes) affecting sleep stages.
Background:
Prior work by Aserinsky and Kleitman (1955) demonstrated a link between eye movements, dream recall, and sleep stages.
1.3 Aims and Procedure
Aims:
Investigate the relationship between eye movements during sleep and dream recall.
Assess dream duration estimates in relation to REM periods.
Determine if eye movement patterns indicate dream content.
Research Method: Laboratory experiment with observational and self-report methods.
Sample: Nine adult participants (five studied intensively).
Procedure:
Monitored sleep stages with EEG and EOG recordings.
Used a repeated measures design for different sleep conditions (woken from REM or nREM).
1.4 Results and Conclusions
Findings:
Dream recall was significantly better during REM sleep (79.6% of awakenings) than nREM (6.9%).
Positive correlation between perceived dream duration and actual REM duration (r values ranged from 0.4 to 0.71).
Specific eye movement patterns correlated with dream content: dreams with vertical or horizontal movements were rare.
Conclusions:
Dreams predominantly occur during REM, with longer dream stages happening later in the sleep period.
1.5 Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths:
High internal validity due to operational definitions and minimized demand characteristics.
High reliability through quantitative EEG data.
Weaknesses:
Limited generalizability due to small sample size.
Low ecological validity as laboratory conditions may alter natural sleep patterns.
Cognitive Approach
2.1 Introduction
Main Assumptions:
Behavior and emotions can be understood through cognitive processes such as attention, memory, and language.
Differences among individuals are based on patterns of cognition.
2.2 Andrade (Doodling)
Study Title: What Does Doodling Do? (2010)
Aim: Investigate whether doodling assists in processing information during a tedious task.
Method: Laboratory experiment with 40 university participants.
Procedure: Divided participants into doodling and control groups to listen to a monotonous message. Measured recall of names and places.
Doodlers shaded shapes while listening, control group did not doodle.
Results:
Doodlers recalled an average of 7.5 names, while non-doodlers recalled 5.8.
Confirmed that doodling improves concentration, with potential explanations around attention and memory.
2.3 Baron-Cohen et al. (Eyes Test)
Study Title: The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test (2001)
Aim: Examine theory of mind understanding in adults with Asperger Syndrome vs. typical adults.
Method: Natural experiment with four participant groups.
Utilized forced-choice test of eye pairs to assess ability to infer emotions or mental states.
Results:
Adults with Asperger's performed significantly worse than controls, supporting the theory of mind deficits in autism.
Learning Approach
3.1 Introduction
Main Assumptions:
Behavior changes result from conditioning (operant and classical).
Social learning through observation plays a critical role.
3.2 Bandura et al. (Aggression)
Study Title: Transmission of Aggression Through Imitation of Aggressive Models (1961)
Aim: Investigate observational learning of aggression in children.
Results:
Witnessed aggressive models led to increased aggressive behavior in children, specifically in physical aggression.
More boys imitated aggression than girls, illustrating gender differences in learning through observation.
Social Approach
4.1 Milgram (Obedience)
Study Title: Behavioral Study of Obedience (1963)
Aim: Study obedience to authority figures in relation to harming others.
Results:
65% of participants complied fully to the extreme instruction to administer shocks.
Showed high levels of obedience, supporting situational factors in behavior.
Ethical issues included deception, emotional strain, and right to withdraw.
4.2 Piliavin et al. (Subway Samaritans)
Aim: Investigate bystander behavior concerning victim conditions (drunk vs. ill) in a naturalistic setting.
Results:
More help was provided to an ill victim than a drunk one, demonstrating social factors in prosocial behavior.
Gender and same-race preferences influenced actions, emphasizing situational impacts on helping behavior.