Selective Law Enforcement (Marxist)
Selective Law Enforcement:
Focus on the crimes of the working class leads to more arrests for petty crimes than for corporate and white-collar crime
The perception that street crime is more harmful to society and so law enforcement agencies act on street crime
Example:
In 2019 there were 47,000 knife or sharp instrument-related offences in the UK
Police and media focused on London as there had been 79 fatal stabbings in London
In the same year, 69,000 people were seriously injured and 147 people died in work-related accidents
Costs of Crime:
Snider (1993) argued that corporate and white-collar crime costs society more than street crime
Individuals involved in corporate crime are rarely prosecuted and even less likely to receive custodial sentences
Corporate witnesses for the Grenfell inquiry were given immunity from prosecution for testifying
Ideological function of law enforcement:
Focusing on working-class crime causes misrepresentation of the working class as a criminal
Gordon (1976): prosecutions of corporate crimes suggest that the criminal justice system is fair
Reiman and Leighton (2009): the US justice system is lenient with middle-class offenders and biased against poor
Evaluations:
This is evidenced by increased policing of working-class and minority-ethnic areas
The complex nature of corporate crime and the financial power of companies leads to lower rates of conviction
National Audit Office - fraud cost private sector businesses an estimated £144bn and individuals £10b in 2015