Command Word Taxonomy – Edexcel IGCSE Biology

Command Word Taxonomy – Overview

  • Source: Pearson Edexcel International GCSE in Biology, Specification – Issue 2 – April 2018 (pp. 45–46)
  • Purpose: Clarifies what examiners expect when particular command words appear in external assessments.
  • Importance for exam preparation:
    • Guides depth, style, and structure of answers.
    • Prevents loss of marks through misunderstanding vocabulary.
    • Helps allocate time by signalling complexity (e.g.
    • “Give/State/Name” ≈ recall, low-time;
    • “Evaluate” ≈ extended reasoning, higher-time).

Practical Usage Tips (cross-command)

  • Always underline/highlight the command word before starting an answer.
  • Map command words to Bloom’s taxonomy levels:
    • Knowledge/Comprehension → “Give”, “Identify”, “Describe”.
    • Application/Analysis → “Calculate”, “Determine”, “Analyse”.
    • Synthesis/Evaluation → “Discuss”, “Evaluate”, “Justify”.
  • If two verbs appear (e.g. “Analyse the data to explain…”), meet both demands: first dissect patterns, then link them to mechanisms.

Individual Command Words & Expected Responses

Add / Label

  • Task: Append missing information or labels to provided stimulus (diagram, table, graph).
  • Key requirement: accuracy in positioning and terminology.
  • Example: Label the aorta, pulmonary artery, and septum on a heart diagram.

Calculate

  • Task: Produce a numerical answer; all working must be shown.
  • Marks often split \approx 1/3 method, 2/3 accuracy.
  • Include units and significant figures as specified.
  • Example: “Calculate the magnification given image size \div actual size.”

Comment on

  • Task: Synthesise multiple data sources to form a brief, balanced judgement.
  • Often follows graphs/tables.
  • Structure: observation → interpretation → mini-conclusion.

Complete

  • Task: Fill in all blanks of a provided structure (table/diagram).
  • May involve text, numbers, or symbols.

Deduce

  • Task: Draw logical conclusion(s) solely from supplied information.
  • No external knowledge unless expressly allowed.

Describe

  • Task: Provide a developed, sequential account without justification.
  • Use link-words (e.g. “first… then… finally…”).
  • Example: “Describe the process of transpiration.”

Determine

  • Task: Derive a quantitative answer from given stimulus OR show quantitative method.
  • No credit for purely qualitative statements.

Design

  • Task: Produce a step-by-step procedure/experiment.
  • Must include controls, variables, apparatus, safety.

Discuss

  • Triple expectation:
    • Identify the issue/problem.
    • Explore all facets (pros, cons, alternatives).
    • Use reasoned argument to reach conclusion.
  • Balance is essential; unsupported bias loses marks.

Draw

  • Task: Create an accurate diagram (ruler/freehand as context demands).
  • Clean labels, proportion, no shading unless instructed.

Estimate

  • Task: Provide approximate value from data/graphical cues.
  • Show quick calculation or reasoning path.

Evaluate

  • Task: Review data/methods → weigh strengths & weaknesses → reach supported judgement in context.
  • Use phrases: “A strength is…”, “However, a limitation…”, “Therefore…”.

Explain

  • Task: Provide reasoning/justification;
  • Can include equations or causal language.
  • Framework: cause → biological mechanism → effect.

Give / State / Name

  • Synonymous recall commands; usually one-word or short-phrase answers.
  • No explanation needed unless asked separately.

Give a reason / reasons

  • Similar to above but explicitly requires justification(s).
  • Number of reasons often implied by mark allocation.

Identify

  • Task: Select key information from resource; minimal wording.

Justify

  • Task: Supply evidence to support a given statement or prior answer.
  • Cite data, theory, or calculated values.

Plot

  • Task: Draw graph with accurate points, suitable scale, labelled axes, and best-fit line.
  • Omission of any element costs marks.

Predict

  • Task: State expected result/outcome.
  • Must align logically with prior trends/theory.

Show that

  • Task: Verify given statement; usually algebraic or numerical proof.
  • Answer must end with quoted value to confirm.

Sketch

  • Task: Quick freehand drawing; axes unscaled but labelled; highlight significant features (e.g. maxima/minima).

State what is meant by

  • Task: Provide definition of term; multiple phrasings acceptable if precise.

Suggest

  • Task: Offer plausible solution/explanation in novel context based on scientific principles.
  • Creative but scientifically grounded.

Verb Preceding a Command Word (Composite)

  • Example: “Analyse the data/graph to explain”.
  • Must complete both actions sequentially: dissect patterns THEN connect to theory.

Multiple-Choice Commands – What / Why

  • In MCQs, “What” asks for selection of correct option; “Why” demands underlying reasoning when explanation part is present.

Real-World & Exam Strategy Connections

  • Employers and higher education value precise command-word literacy for reports and research proposals.
  • Ethical aspect: Accurate interpretation (e.g. in “Evaluate”) prevents misrepresentation of data in public health.
  • Time management tip: Circle high-level verbs (“Evaluate”, “Discuss”) during reading time; allocate proportionate minutes (~1 mark ≈ 1 minute + planning).

Quick Reference Table (Condensed)

  • Recall: Give/State/Name, Identify.
  • Understanding: Describe, Explain, State what is meant by.
  • Application: Calculate, Determine, Show that, Plot, Estimate.
  • Analysis: Analyse, Deduce, Comment on.
  • Synthesis: Design, Suggest.
  • Evaluation: Discuss, Evaluate, Justify, Predict.

Numerical & Formatting Reminders

  • Always box final calculated answers.
  • Use SI units (e.g. cm^3, g, mol) unless question provides alternative.
  • Graph scales: choose simple multiples (e.g. 1, 2, 5) for ease of plotting.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Answering “Explain” with mere description.
  • Providing qualitative answer for “Determine”.
  • Forgetting units after “Calculate”.
  • Unbalanced argument in “Discuss/Evaluate”.