Part 1: Age-Crime Relationship and Theories of Control and Strain
Age-Crime Relationship
Definition: Describes how individuals' involvement in criminal activity tends to vary across different age groups.
Key Features
Adolescent Peak
Criminal activity peaks during adolescence, specifically in mid-to-late teenage years.
Influencing factors include:
Peer influence
Identity formation
Increased autonomy from parents
Desistance in Adulthood
After adolescence, criminal involvement typically declines as individuals transition into adulthood, a process known as "aging out".
Contributing factors to desistance:
Increased responsibilities (e.g., employment, family)
Maturation of self-control
Changes in social networks and opportunities
Continuity or Persistence
Some individuals continue to offend into adulthood.
Influencing factors include:
Early onset of criminal activity
Chronic exposure to risks (e.g., poverty, substance abuse)
Persistent antisocial traits
Gender Differences
Males generally exhibit higher rates of criminal behavior than females.
The age-crime curve for females shows lower rates overall and less pronounced peaks in adolescence.
Factors influencing differences:
Socialization processes
Role expectations
Opportunities for crime
Variations Across Offense Types
Different offenses may show various age-crime relationships.
Example: Property crimes (theft, vandalism) peak during adolescence while violent crimes may follow different patterns.
Control Balance Theory (CBT)
Overview: Proposes that unbalanced control ratios (either more or less control imposed on individuals) can motivate deviant behavior when provoked by reminders of these imbalances.
Types of Control Imbalances:
Control Deficits: When external control exceeds personal control.
Control Surpluses: When personal control exceeds external control.
Conditions Favoring Deviance
Perception that deviant behavior could increase control beyond the likely consequences.
Low self-control.
Intense provocation.
Absence of constraining factors (e.g., moral feelings).
Techniques of Neutralization (Sykes & Matza)
Offenders neutralize their guilt through five main techniques:
Denial of Responsibility: Offenders claim external factors caused their actions.
Denial of Injury: Offenders minimize or deny the harm inflicted.
Denial of Victim: Offenders blame the victims for their actions.
Condemnation of the Condemners: Offenders criticize those who judge them.
Appeal to Higher Loyalties: Offenders justify their actions by prioritizing loyalty to family, friends, or groups over societal norms.
Limitations and Criticism of CBT
Complexity and difficulty in empirical testing.
Assumes rational decision-making.
Limited practical application for creating interventions due to its theoretical complexity.
Self-Control Theory
Definition: Self-control is characterized by impulsivity, preference for simple tasks, risk-seeking, and low empathy.
Stability: Self-control is largely stable after age 8-10, with implications for lifelong outcomes including crime and general well-being.
Measuring Self-Control
Grasmick et al. (1993) LLSC Scale includes items evaluating impulsivity, risk-seeking behavior, and self-centeredness, among others.
Empirical Evidence
Moderate correlation between self-control and offending behaviors, accounting for about 30% of variance in criminal activities.
Parenting influences self-control development but is not the sole factor; neighborhoods and genetics also play roles.
General Strain Theory (GST) (Agnew)
Strain occurs when individuals perceive barriers to achieving societal goals leading to negative emotional states, which may provoke criminal behavior.
Types of Strain:
Objective (widely disliked situations)
Subjective (personally disliked situations)
Factors Increasing Criminal Coping
Poor conventional coping skills, exposure to criminal peers, and negative emotional traits can lead to increased likelihood of criminal coping.
Policy Implications of GST
Propose interventions aimed at improving social environments to mitigate exposure to strain and improving coping skills.
Age-Crime Relationship
The Age-Crime Relationship refers to how criminal activities vary across different age groups, typically peaking during adolescence when factors such as peer influence and identity formation are significant.
Key elements include:
Adolescent Peak: Criminal behavior peaks in mid-to-late teen years due to social and developmental influences.
Desistance in Adulthood: Refers to the decline in criminal activity as individuals take on adult responsibilities and mature psychologically.
Continuity/Persistence: Some individuals persist in criminal activities into adulthood often due to early onset and chronic exposure to risk factors.
Gender Differences: Males exhibit more criminal behavior than females due to differences in socialization and opportunities.
Variations Across Offense Types: Different ages may correlate with specific types of crime; for example, property crimes peak during adolescence, while violent crimes follow different trends.
Control Balance Theory (CBT)
Authors: Charles Tittle.
Key elements include the concept that an imbalance in control can motivate deviant behavior.
CBT posits that individuals may act deviant when they perceive a disparity in control that can be rectified through their actions. Conditions favoring deviance include low self-control, intense provocation, and the perception that deviant actions will enhance control. Limitations of CBT include complexity and difficulty in practical application.
Techniques of Neutralization (Sykes & Matza)
Authors: Gresham Sykes and David Matza.
This theory posits that offenders use justifications to neutralize guilt associated with their actions.
The five main techniques of neutralization are:
Denial of Responsibility: Attributing actions to external factors rather than personal choice.
Denial of Injury: Downplaying the harm of their actions or claiming no real injury occurred.
Denial of Victim: Blaming the victim for the outcome of their own actions.
Condemnation of the Condemners: Discrediting those who judge their actions.
Appeal to Higher Loyalties: Justifying actions based on allegiances to family, friends, or groups over societal norms.
Self-Control Theory
Authors: Gottfredson and Hirschi.
Also known as the General Theory of Crime.
Key elements include impulsivity and preference for immediate gratification.
Self-control consists of the ability to resist immediate temptations for long-term benefits. Empirical evidence suggests a moderate correlation between self-control and criminal behavior, with parenting and environmental factors also influencing self-control development. Critiques of this theory include its emphasis on personal control without considering broader social influences and the challenges in measuring self-control accurately.
Anomie and Strain Theories
Émile Durkheim defines anomie as a state of normlessness where societal expectations are unclear or eroded.
There is a difference in application, with macro-level focusing on societal structures and micro-level on individual behavior impacted by anomie.
Merton’s Strain Theory (1950s)
Author: Robert Merton.
Key aspects of Merton’s theory articulate that not everyone who experiences strain resorts to crime; it depends on their adaptation strategy.
Merton describes five modes of adaptation to strain:
Conformity: Adhering to societal norms despite strain.
Innovation: Utilizing illegal means to achieve societal goals.
Ritualism: Abandoning societal goals but still adhering to norms.
Retreatism: Rejecting both societal goals and means, often leading to withdrawal.
Rebellion: Actively rejecting and attempting to replace existing societal norms. Critiques of Merton’s theory include oversimplification of human motivation and neglect of power dynamics.
General Strain Theory (GST)
Author: Robert Agnew.
Key aspects involve the relationship between societal barriers and violent emotions leading to crime.
Agnew categorizes strain as objective and subjective, where objective strain denotes universal adverse conditions, while subjective strain is based on an individual's personal experiences.
Strain typically impacts individuals by fostering negative emotions, prompting the adoption of criminal coping methods. Factors increasing criminal coping include poor coping skills and association with criminal peers, leading to policy implications focused on improving social environments.