Consumer behavior
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Introduction
In daily life, people buy goods and services for consumption to derive satisfaction.
Consumer theory explores how individuals decide which goods and services to purchase.
Consumer Choice
Consumer theory suggests that we can understand consumer preferences from their choices.
Consumers compare different bundles of goods to make choices.
When comparing two consumption bundles, a consumer will either prefer one bundle over the other or be indifferent between them.
Preferences
To determine preference, observe consumer behavior in choice situations.
If a consumer consistently chooses bundle X over bundle Y when both are available, it suggests a preference for X.
indicates that the consumer strictly prefers X to Y.
Indifference
If a consumer is indifferent between two bundles, it's denoted as .
Indifference means the consumer derives equal satisfaction from consuming either bundle X or bundle Y.
Weak preference, denoted , means the consumer either prefers X or is indifferent between X and Y.
The Concept of Utility
Utility is the satisfaction or pleasure from consuming a good or service.
It represents the power of a product to satisfy human wants.
A consumer prefers bundle X over bundle Y if and only if the utility of X is greater than the utility of Y.
Utility vs. Usefulness
Utility and usefulness are not the same.
Usefulness is product-centric (based on the function of the product), while utility is consumer-centric (based on the satisfaction derived by the consumer).
For example, a painting may be functionally useless but provide great utility to art lovers.
Subjectivity of Utility
Utility is subjective and varies from person to person.
The utility derived from a product may not be the same for two different individuals.
For example, non-smokers may not derive any utility from cigarettes.
Utility Variation
Utility can vary based on place and time.
The utility derived from drinking coffee in the morning may differ from the utility derived during lunch time.
Approaches to Measuring Utility
There are two main approaches to measuring or comparing consumer utility: cardinal and ordinal approaches.
The cardinalist school believes utility can be measured objectively.
The ordinalist school believes utility cannot be measured in cardinal numbers but can be ranked or ordered.
Cardinal Utility Theory
Cardinal utility theory states that utility is measurable in arbitrary units called utils (e.g., 1, 2, 3).
For example, consuming an orange gives Bilen 10 utils, and a banana gives her 8 utils. This indicates Bilen gets more satisfaction from the orange than the banana.
Assumptions of Cardinal Utility Theory
Rationality: Consumers aim to maximize satisfaction given budget constraints.
Measurable Utility: Utility is cardinally measurable in utils.
Constant Marginal Utility of Money: The value of a unit of money is constant regardless of when or where it's spent.
Diminishing Marginal Utility (DMU): The utility derived from each additional unit of a commodity decreases as consumption increases.
Total and Marginal Utility
Total Utility (TU): The total satisfaction from consuming a specific quantity of a commodity at a particular time.
Total utility increases as more of a good is consumed, up to a saturation point.
Marginal Utility (MU): The additional satisfaction from consuming one more unit of a product.
Marginal utility is the change in total utility resulting from the consumption of one more unit of a product.
Graphically, it's the slope of the total utility curve.
Mathematically, marginal utility is:
Relationship between TU and MU
When TU is increasing, MU is positive.
When TU is maximized, MU is zero.
When TU is decreasing, MU is negative.
Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
The law states that as the quantity consumed of a commodity increases per unit of time, the utility derived from each successive unit decreases, assuming consumption of all other commodities remains constant.
The extra satisfaction declines as more of the product is consumed in a given period.
Assumptions of the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
The consumer is rational.
The consumer consumes identical/homogenous products.
The commodity has similar quality, color, design, etc.
There is no time gap in consumption.
Consumer tastes/preferences remain unchanged.
Limitations of Cardinal Approach
The assumption of cardinal utility is doubtful since utility may not be quantified objectively.
The assumption of constant MU of money is unrealistic because as income increases, the marginal utility of money changes.
Ordinal Utility Theory
Ordinal utility approach suggests consumers cannot express utility in absolute terms but can rank commodities in order of preference.
Consumers rank commodities as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.
Consumers need not know the specific utility of various commodities to make a choice, but they need to rank the baskets of goods according to the satisfaction each bundle provides.
Assumptions of Ordinal Utility Theory
Rationality: Consumers maximize satisfaction given income and market prices.
Ordinal Utility: Utility is not cardinally measurable; consumers only need to rank preferences.
Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution: The rate at which a consumer is willing to substitute one commodity for another while maintaining total satisfaction.
The rate diminishes as the consumer consumes more of the good.
Total utility is measured by the quantities of all items consumed.
Consistent Preferences: Consumer preferences are consistent. If a consumer prefers X to Y and Y to Z, then they should prefer X to Z (Axiom of Transitivity).
Indifference Curves
Indifference curves represent combinations of two goods that give a consumer the same level of satisfaction or utility.
Utility remains constant across all points on the curve.
They illustrate consumer preferences and choices.
It's a graph showing different combinations of two goods with which a consumer is equally satisfied.
Properties of Indifference Curves
Downward Sloping: Reflecting the tradeoff between the two goods; to maintain the same level of utility, increasing one good requires decreasing the other.
Convex to the Origin: Reflecting the diminishing marginal rate of substitution (MRS).
Non-intersecting: Intersecting curves would imply a consumer derives the same utility from different combinations, which contradicts the principle of distinct satisfaction levels.
Higher Curves Represent Higher Utility: Curves farther from the origin are preferred.
Do Not Touch Axes: Implying the consumer derives utility from both goods.
Marginal Rate of Substitution
Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) is the slope of an indifference curve, indicating how much of one good a consumer is willing to give up for one more unit of the other while keeping utility constant.
The MRS typically diminishes as the consumer moves along the curve, making the curve convex.
Budget Line
A budget line (or budget constraint) represents the combinations of two goods or services a consumer can afford, given income and prices.
It's a graphical representation of spending limits.
Consumer Equilibrium
Consumer equilibrium is when a consumer maximizes utility subject to their budget constraint.
It's achieved when income is allocated so that satisfaction cannot be improved by spending differently.
Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus is the difference between what a consumer is willing to pay for a good and what they actually pay.
It represents the extra satisfaction consumers receive when they pay less than their willingness to pay. Also perceived value derives utility.