Unit 2: Sensory Memory - Comprehensive Academic Notes

Introduction to Sensory Memory

  • Definition: Sensory memory is a specific memory term applied to the extremely brief storage of information within a particular sensory modality.
  • General Capability: Humans are capable of perceiving and remembering visual stimuli that are extremely brief. The efficiency and level of adaptation remain constant regardless of whether the objects perceived are:
    • Persistent/Permanent: Objects that remain in the field of vision.
    • Transient/Fleeting: Objects that appear and disappear rapidly.
  • The Continuity of Perception: Sensory memory allows the perceptual system to store visual information long enough to bridge the gap between static images. For example, when a sequence of static images is presented rapidly with blank intervals in between, we perceive a continuous moving image. This is because the system integrates each static image with the next slightly different one.
  • Specific Subtypes (Exam Priority):
    • Iconic Memory: The brief storage of visual information. It contains patterns of light waiting to be analyzed rather than letters or digits.
    • Echoic Memory: The brief storage of auditory information.
  • Primary Function: These stores preserve input beyond the physical existence of the generating stimulus, essentially "extending the life" of the stimuli (Ruiz-Vargas, 1980).

Historical Origins and the Apprehension Amplitude

  • Sir William Hamilton (19th Century): Hamilton repeatedly found that when a handful of balls are thrown onto a flat surface, a person cannot easily see more than 66 or 77 at a glance.
  • W. S. Jevons: Jevons conducted experiments by estimating the number of black seeds falling into a tray.
    • Method: He would "estimate without the slightest hesitation" the number of seeds immediately after they stopped moving.
    • Findings: The average estimate was correct until it reached approximately 88 or 99 seeds. Beyond this amount, the error rate increased gradually.
  • James Mckeen Cattell (1883):
    • Tool: Utilized a specialized machine called a Tachistoscope.
    • Technique (Total Report): Subjects were presented with sets of letters or words and asked to report every item they could remember.
    • Results:
      • When stimuli contained up to 44 items, subjects made zero mistakes.
      • As items increased, the correct average identification settled between 44 and 55 items.
    • Definition: The amount of information correctly identified and remembered after a brief visual exposition is defined as the Apprehension Amplitude.

The Iconic Memory and George Sperling's Experiments

  • Sperling (1960) Research Problems: Sperling identified two fundamental issues with the "apprehension amplitude" findings:
    1. Observers see more information than they can actually verbalize immediately after a brief presentation.
    2. The observer's report includes only the recalled information, not the totality of what was actually perceived.
  • Total Report Task Findings:
    • Method: Exposing subjects to letter arrays for times ranging from 15ms15\,ms to 500ms500\,ms.
    • Data: Regardless of the exposure duration (15ms15\,ms, 50ms50\,ms, 150ms150\,ms, 300ms300\,ms, or 500ms500\,ms), the results were unchanged.
    • Observation: Subjects were consistently unable to remember more than 44 or 55 letters (4.54.5 on average).
    • Conclusion: There was no perception problem; the limitation was not attributable to the visual system itself but to a memory limit.
  • Partial Report Task (The Breakthrough):
    • Hypothesis: Subjects have more information available than they can provide before the memory trace fades.
    • Method: Subjects were shown letter arrays (typically 33 rows). Exposure was always 50ms50\,ms.
    • Cues: Immediately after the presentation, a tone was played to indicate which row to report:
      • High pitch (2,500Hz2,500\,Hz): Top row.
      • Medium pitch (650Hz650\,Hz): Middle row.
      • Low pitch (250Hz250\,Hz): Lower row.
    • Delay Conditions: The interval between the disappearance of letters and the cue tone varied (0ms0\,ms, 150ms150\,ms, 300ms300\,ms, 500ms500\,ms, and 1,000ms1,000\,ms).
    • Results:
      • At 0ms0\,ms delay: Subjects remembered an average of 9.19.1 letters (approx. 76%76\%, twice the capacity of the total report).
      • At 500ms500\,ms delay: Subjects still averaged 9.19.1 letters.
      • At 1,000ms1,000\,ms delay: Performance dropped to the level of the total report (approx. 4.54.5 letters).
  • Key Conclusions:
    1. Information is available for longer than the physical stimulus via sensory stores.
    2. Visual information (iconic mode) decays as a function of signal delay, lasting approximately 500ms500\,ms.
    3. The superiority of the partial report over the total report highlights the existence of two systems:
      • Iconic Memory: High capacity, very short-lived.
      • Short-Term Memory (STM): Limited capacity, significantly longer duration.

Visual Persistence vs. Informative Persistence

  • Visual Sensory Memory Unitarity: It is not a unitary system; it includes two distinct phenomena.
  • Visible Persistence: This refers to the visual stimuli remaining visible for some time after physical disappearance. It includes the persistence of the characteristics of the stimuli (e.g., "I see something yellow").
  • Informative Persistence: This allows for the extraction of information from a stimulus after it is physically gone. It functions as if the stimulus were still present (e.g., extracting the detail of a ball in a scene).

Masking Processes in Sensory Memory

  • Masking Defined: A process where the perception or storage of a stimulus is influenced by events occurring immediately before (forward masking) or after (backward masking) the stimulus.
  • Brightness Masking (Sperling, 1963):
    • The brighter the light during the interval after stimulus presentation, the poorer the memory performance.
    • Light occupies or disrupts the memory trace.
  • Pattern (Visual) Masking:
    • Occurs when targets are followed by a mask containing broadly similar features.
    • Binocular Stage Influence: Pattern masking works even if the target is shown to one eye and the mask to the other. This indicates the mask affects a late stage of processing where information from both eyes is combined into a single percept.
  • Averbach and Sperling (1961):
    • Immediate presentation allowed for 1414 to 1818 items to be available.
    • Delay dramatically decreased availability, specifically when fields before and after the stimulus were illuminated.

Measuring the Duration of Iconic Memory

  • General Estimates: Provisional duration is between 250ms250\,ms and 500ms500\,ms.
  • Demographic Variations:
    • Young Subjects (Average 2020 years): Approx. 340ms340\,ms.
    • Elderly (Average 8181 years): Approx. 300ms300\,ms.
    • Elderly with Mild Neurocognitive Impairment (Average 8484 years): Approx. 70ms70\,ms.
  • Measurement Techniques (Vargas, 2010):
    • Retroactive Masking: A circle cue is placed around a letter.
      • 0ms0\,ms interval: Subject sees the letter inside the circle (single image).
      • 0300ms0-300\,ms interval: Subject reports an empty circle; the letter recognition process was interrupted before completion.
      • >300ms>300\,ms interval: No interference; recognition was already completed and transferred to STM.
    • Synchrony Judges: Subjects judge if an auditory event coincides with the beginning of a visual event. The interval at which they appear simultaneous defines the icon duration.
    • Phenomenal Continuity (Haber and Standing, 1969): Alternating a black circle with a white field. If the white field lasts 250300ms250-300\,ms, the subject perceives the circle as continuously present.
  • Content Characteristics: Sperling (1960) found that when asked to report only numbers or only letters from a mixed array, subjects performed no better than the total report limit (4.54.5 items).
    • Conclusion: Iconic memory is uncategorized (pre-perceptual/physical characteristics).

Echoic Memory: The Auditory Storage System

  • Necessity: The brain must maintain early segments of auditory stimuli until enough signal is received to understand meaning.
  • Moray, Bates & Barnett (1965) - "The Man with Four Ears":
    • Method: Four messages sent simultaneously from four positions (left, right, front, back).
    • Results: Confirmed the superiority of the partial report in auditory mode. Using a light cue to signal the relevant channel resulted in more letters recalled than the total report condition.
  • Massaro (1972) - Echoic Masking:
    • Method: Presented vowels for 20ms20\,ms followed by a masking tone at intervals of 0500ms0-500\,ms.
    • Findings:
      • Short intervals (035ms0-35\,ms): Identification was poor (50%50\% error rate).
      • At 250ms250\,ms: Identification reached an asymptote (almost perfect).
    • Conclusion: Echoic memory duration is approximately a quarter of a second (250ms250\,ms).
  • Crowder (1971) - The Suffix Effect:
    • A list of 99 digits was presented.
    • If followed by a tone (no masking), recall was high.
    • If followed by the digit "zero" (suffix/masking), recall was significantly worse.
  • Two Levels of Auditory Representation:
    1. Auditory Persistence: Peripheral, crude, pre-categorical. Duration: 250300ms250-300\,ms.
    2. Post-categorical Auditory Representation: Perceptual and abstract. It is generated after the stimulus disappears and can maintain information for over 1010 seconds to allow for full recognition.