4-Interface-1
Digital and Social Media: Critical Approaches
Course Overview
Course Title: SOJE/DMJN/MX222 – Digital and Social Media: Critical Approaches
Institution: Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford
Faculty: Faculty of Liberal Arts
Date: September 17, 2024
Instructor: David M. Meurer, PhD
Profiles in Digital Culture
Concept of Profiles
The status of self in digital culture is linked to ubiquitous methods, services, and devices used in everyday life.
This trend has shifted the nature of profiles from being applicable mostly to the categorization of criminals and those deemed mentally unstable in the past to a more normalized aspect of self-representation today.
Evolution of Profiling
Traditional Uses of Profiles (Before ~25 years ago):
Exclusively categorized criminals and mentally unstable individuals.
Definitions:
Contours of buildings or mountain ranges.
Side view of a face (18th century).
Schematic outline of a person (20th century).
Development of Children Profiling (1910):
Grigory Rossolimo categorized children by attention span, memory, and associative ability, resulting in profiles indicating behavioral disorders.
Profiling in Psychology and Criminology
1950s-1960s: Profiling methods for identifying serial killers were developed, focusing on:
Emotional clues (hatred, fear, rage).
Transforming known subjects to unknown subjects through scientific methods.
Contemporary Shift in Profiling
Shift from:
Abnormality to normality.
Coerced description to voluntary representation.
Undesirable to desirable presentations.
Evaluation to self-representation.
Foucault's Analysis of Subjectivity and Power
Modes of Subject Formation
Three modes by which individuals are made subjects:
Inquiry that claims objective knowledge.
Dividing practices classifying individuals (mad vs. sane, etc.).
Self-transformation through personal practices (self-care, relationships).
Power Dynamics
Power operates through institutions via knowledge, establishing a framework that:
Supports domination and reinforces political/economic systems.
Reflects the concept of a historical a priori or episteme.
The Archaeology of Knowledge
An episteme establishes:
Strategic possibilities within knowledge fields.
Definitions of what is thinkable/knowable (e.g., heliocentric theory).
Rules and methods guiding social discourse and practices.
Foucault's Power Dynamics
Characteristics of Power
Power is productive, influencing everyday life:
Not limited to coercion, but diffuses through norms and societal regulations.
Individuals are shaped by power relations rather than being self-constituting.
Different modes of power architectures:
Sovereign power
Disciplinary power
Biopower
Applications of Disciplinary Power
Examples of systems functioning under disciplinary power include:
Family, school, military, law enforcement.
Institutions organize and regulate individuals while contributing to societal management and surveillance.
Digital Culture and Contemporary Profiles
The Role of Digital Profiles
Modern profiles extend beyond traditional institutional contexts, influencing:
Advertiser-targeting mechanisms that align users with businesses rather than individuals with criminal profiles.
Profiles influence many aspects of life:
Job applications, self-presentation on professional networks, and predictive analytics in advertising.
Exercises and Practical Application
Profile Data Analysis Activity
Log into a digital/social media account and list required and voluntarily provided data points:
Common Data Points: Name, email address, birthdate, gender, etc.
Analyze norms presupposed by these data points and the responses required.
References
Bernard, A. "Profiles: The Development of a Format." The Triumph of Profiling: The Self in Digital Culture.
Foucault, M. The Archaeology of Knowledge.
Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction.