Social Cognitive Theories and the Self
Module 47 Overview
Social Cognitive Perspective
Proposed by Albert Bandura.
Key Concept: Behavior is influenced by the interaction between an individual's traits (including thoughts) and their social context.
Stresses the interplay of traits and situations applying principles of learning, thinking, cognition, and social behavior.
Reciprocal Influences
Reciprocal Determinism: Behavior results from the interaction of internal personal factors (thoughts, feelings) and external environmental factors.
Three Types of Interactions:
Individuals select different environments.
Personalities shape how events are interpreted and reacted to.
Personalities influence situations that elicit reactions from others.
Example of Reciprocal Determinism
Internal factors: Interest in rock climbing, prior experiences.
Behavioral factors: Deciding to try rock climbing based on internal and environmental influences.
Environmental factors: Presence of friends who rock climb or past experiences with climbing.
Gene-Environment Interaction
Genetically influenced traits can provoke responses from others, guiding behavior.
Example: Peer pressure can influence decisions, like trying rock climbing if others are enthusiastic.
Biopsychosocial Approach
Personality studied across multiple levels:
Biological: Genetic temperament, autonomic nervous system reactivity, brain activity distinctions between extroverts and introverts.
Learned Responses: Influence of unconscious thought patterns and perceptions.
Sociocultural Influences: Effects of childhood experiences, cultural expectations, and social support on self-concept.
Assessment in Social Cognitive Theory
Better predictions of behavior derive from observing past behavior in similar situations.
Assessment center exercises tend to reveal visible dimensions of personality better than other methods.
Emphasizes practical behavior rather than unconscious motives or biologically influenced traits.
Criticism of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)
Critics argue SCT focuses too heavily on situational aspects and neglects internal traits.
Acknowledges the varied assumptions, views, and assessment methods in different personality theories.
The Concept of the Self
Central to personality, the self organizes thoughts, feelings, and actions.
Neuroscience research identifies active brain regions during self-reflection.
Historical perspectives on the self:
William James (1890)
Gordon Allport (1943)
Self Concepts
Self-Esteem: Personal assessment of self-worth. High self-esteem correlates with confidence; low self-esteem correlates with self-doubt.
Self-Efficacy: Belief in the effectiveness of one’s actions. Influences persistence on difficult tasks and overall happiness.
Causation Consideration: Correlation does not imply causation; high self-efficacy does not necessarily stem from happiness or persistence.
Impact of Self-Image
Self-image threats can lead to increased racial bias.
Hands-on experiences in job-relevant situations are effective predictors of job performance.
General self-image correlates weakly with academic success, whereas academic self-efficacy has a stronger prediction ability.
Praise and Performance
Over praising without performance may harm self-esteem and lead to complacency; reinforces the idea of participation ribbons.
Benefits of humanistic psychology indicate acceptance of the self aids in accepting others.
Costs of Self-Esteem
Balance between optimism and pessimism is essential for success.
Excessive optimism can cause blindness to real risks and may lead to complacency.
Blindness to Incompetence: Overconfident individuals may not recognize their lack of competence.
Self-Serving Bias
Tendency to view oneself positively – taking credit for successes but blaming external factors for failures.
Better Than Average Effect: The common belief that one is superior compared to peers despite statistical limitations.
Risks linked to narcissism due to disproportionate self-focus.
Strategic Self-Disparagement
Self-criticism may serve strategic purposes, such as preparing for potential failure and allowing for learning from mistakes.
Defensive vs. Secure Self-Esteem:
Defensive Self-Esteem: Fragile; identity threatened by failure.
Secure Self-Esteem: More robust; less influenced by external validation, leading to greater quality of life.