Lecture 6 - Concise
Vulnerable Witnesses
Persons under 18 (children)
Witnesses with significant intellectual or social impairments
Witnesses with mental disorders
Physically disabled witnesses
Adults whose evidence may be diminished due to fear or distress (intimidated witnesses, Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999).
Child Witnesses
Early instances of child witnesses (e.g., Salem witch trials) illustrate suggestive interviewing and preconceived notions about children's honesty.
Children generally report fewer details, forget faster, confuse memory sources, and are more suggestible than adults.
Investigative Interviewing Protocols
Guidelines include Memorandum of Good Practice (MOPG, 1992), Achieving Best Evidence (ABE, 2011).
Basic components: establish rapport, seek free narrative, ask questions, and ensure proper closure.
MOPG advises interviews should take place soon after the event, informally, long enough, with opportunities for free storytelling, and follow a step-wise questioning approach.
Cognitive Interviewing Effectiveness
Cognitive interviews (CI) improve recall with children compared to structured interviews, especially with older children.
Modified Cognitive Interviews (MCI) are suitable for younger children, focusing on context reinstatement and allowing for flexibility in questions.
ECI (Enhanced CI) can lead to more correct details but also risks increased confabulation.
Older Adults' Witnesses
Older adults show less accurate recall and are affected by suggestive questioning.
CI may support older adults by allowing them to engage at their own pace and by providing contextual cues that aid memory.
Individuals with Learning Disabilities (LDs)
People with LDs are often vulnerable witnesses and face challenges such as poor memory and high suggestibility.
CI can increase recall accuracy; however, the risk of confabulation exists.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and CI
Individuals with ASD face communication and cognitive challenges that complicate memory recall.
Recent studies indicate that cognitive interviewing techniques may not improve accuracy for individuals with ASD and may lead to increased incorrect details.