Incorporation of Terms: Course of Dealings

Incorporation by Course of Dealings

  • Terms can be incorporated into a contract through a course of dealings.
  • This occurs when terms have been made known through earlier dealings between the parties.

Rule

  • When parties have a history of prior and consistent dealings (similar transactions), terms in those earlier transactions can be incorporated into a later contract.
  • This is the case even if the parties don't explicitly incorporate those old terms into the later contract.
  • Principles of timing, reasonable notice, and drawing attention to onerous terms may not need to be strictly complied with.

Justification

  • By continuing to transact with the other party seeking to impose terms, a party shows a willingness to be bound by those terms.
  • It's efficient; avoids reinventing the wheel for each transaction.

Application

  • Consider relying on this principle when:
    • There's an onerous clause (e.g., exemption clause) one party tries to impose.
    • The clause hasn't been signed (otherwise, incorporation by signature applies).
    • There's an issue with reasonable notice (otherwise, incorporation by notice applies).
    • There's a history of repeated transactions.

Case Example: Bellmaine, New Ferry and Robertson (1906, High Court of Australia)

  • A term was incorporated into a contract where adequate notice might have been an issue.
Facts
  • Mr. Robertson entered Bellmaine New Ferry's private wharf and paid 1p to enter.
  • He missed his ferry and wanted to exit.
  • Bellmaine New Ferry charged entrance and exit fees (1p each) regardless of ferry usage.
  • Robertson refused to pay to exit and was detained.
  • He sued for false imprisonment and assault.
  • Bellmaine New Ferry argued they had a right to detain him because he didn't pay the exit fee.
  • A notice at the entrance stated a fare of 1p must be paid on entering and leaving, irrespective of ferry travel.
Issue
  • Had this term been incorporated into the contract?
Ruling
  • The High Court held that the term was incorporated through prior dealings.
  • Whether or not reasonable notice was given is immaterial due to the prior dealings.
  • Robertson entered the wharf with actual knowledge of the conditions, given his frequent prior travels.
  • He impliedly agreed to those conditions.
  • Key takeaway: Incorporation through prior dealings can apply even without adequate notice in the specific transaction.

Limitations on the Principle

  1. Prior dealings must be regular and uniform:
    • A lack of similarity between transactions suggests no agreed set of terms.
    • Best suited where the same contract is used repeatedly.
  2. Document character:
    • If the document relied upon in previous transactions wouldn't reasonably be considered contractual, it can be argued the terms were never incorporated.
Case Example: D.J. Hill and Coe versus Walter and Wright
  • Involved the supply of machinery.
  • An exclusion clause included at the time of delivery (but included in prior dealings) was not incorporated.
  • The delivery document could reasonably be understood as merely acknowledging delivery, not containing contractual terms.

Conclusion

  • Course of dealings is a third way to incorporate terms into a contract for repeated transactions. The next video will discuss the incorporation of statements made during negotiations.