BOH4M1 Leading
The Nature of leadership
Leadership:
The process of inspiring others to work hard to accomplish important task
Contemporary Leadership challenges
Shorter time frames for accomplishing things
Expectations for success on the first attempt
Complex, ambiguous, and multidimensional Problems
Taking a long term view while meeting short term demands
Leadership and Power
Power:
The ability to get someone else to do something you want done or make things happen in the way you want
Power should be used to influence and control others for the common good rather than seeking to exercise control for personal satisfaction
Two sources of managerial power:
Position power
Personal power
Position power:
Based on a manager’s official status in the organization’s hierarchy of authority
Sources of position power:
Reward power:
Capable of offering something of value
Coercive power:
Capable of delivering punishment or withholding positive outcomes
Legitimate power:
Organizational position or status confers the right to control those in subordinate positions
Personal power:
Based on the unique personal qualities that a person brings to a leadership situation
Sources of personal power:
Expert power:
Capacity to influence others because of one’s knowledge and skills
Referent power:
Capacity to influence others because they admire you and want to identify positively with you
Leadership and Vision
Vision:
A future that one hopes to create or achieve in order to improve upon the present state of affairs
Visionary Leadership:
A leader who brings a clear and compelling sense of the future to any situation, as well as an understanding of the actions needed to get there successfully
Meeting the challenges of visionary leadership:
Challenge the process
Show enthusiasm
Help others to act
Set the example
Celebrate achievements
Leadership as Service
Servant leadership:
Commitment to serving others
Followers more important than leader
“Other centered” not “self-centered”
Power not a “zero-sum” quantity
Focuses on empowerment, not on power
Servant Leadership and Empowerment:
Empowerment:
The way in which managers enable and help others to gain power and achieve influence.
Effective leaders empower othersby providing them with:
Information
Responsibility
Authority
Trust
Leadership Traits
Drive
Self-confidence
Creativity
Cognitive ability
Business knowledge
Motivation
Flexibility
Honesty and integrity
Leadership[ Behaviours
Leadership behaviour theories focus on how leaders behave when working with followers
Leadership styles are recurring patterns of behaviours exhibited by leaders
Basic dimensions of leadership behaviours:
Concern for the task to be accomplished
Concern for the people doing the work
Two Dimensions of Leadership
Task Concerns:
Plans and defines work to be done
Assigns task responsibilities
Sets clear work standards
Urges task completion
Monitors performance results
People Concerns:
Acts warm and supportive toward followers
Develops social rapport with followers
Respects the feelings of followers
Is sensitive to followers’ needs
Shows trust in followers
Blake and Mouton Leadership Grid
Team management:
High task concern; high people concern
Authority-obedience management:
High task concern; low people concern
Country club management:
High people concern; low task concern
Impoverished management:
Low task concern; low people concern
Middle of the road management:
Non-committal for both task concern and people concern
Classical Leadership Style
Classic leadership styles:
Autocratic style:
Emphasizes work over people, keeps authority and information within the leader’s tight control, and acts in a unilateral command-and-control fashion
Human relations style:
Emphasizes people over work.
Laissez-faire style:
Shows little concern for task at hand, lets the group make decisions, and acts with a “do the best you can and don’t bother me” attitude
Democratic style:
Committed to task and people, getting things done while sharing information, encouraging participation in decision making, and helping people develop skills and competencies
Contingency Approaches to Leadership
Fiedler’s Contingency Model:
Good leadership depends on a match between leadership and situational demands
Determining leadership style:
Low LPC: task-motivated leaders
High LPC: relationship-motivated leaders
Leadership is part of one’s personality, and therefore relatively enduring and difficult to change
Leadership style must be fit to the situation
Diagnosing situational control:
Quality of leader-member relations (good or poor)
Degree of task structure (high or low)
Amount of position power (strong or weak)
Task oriented leaders are most successful in:
Very favourable (high control) situations
Very unfavourable (low control) situations
Relationship-oriented leaders are most successful in:
Situations of moderate control
Contingency Approaches to Leadership
The Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership model:
Leaders adjust their styles depending on the readiness of their followers to perform in a given situation
Readiness: how able, willing and confident followers are in performing tasks
Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership Styles
Delegating:
Low-task, low-relationship style
Works best in high readiness-situations
Participating:
Low-task, high-relationship style
Works best in low- to moderate-readiness situations
Selling:
High-task, high-relationship style
Work best in moderate- to high-readiness situations
Telling:
High-task, low-relationship style
Work best in low-readiness situations
Path-goal Leadership Theory
House’s path-goal leadership theory:
Effective leadership deals with the paths through which followers can achieve goals.
Leadership styles for dealing with path-goal relationships:
Directive leadership
Supportive leadership
Achievement-oriented leadership
Participative leadership
House Leadership Styles
Directive leadership:
Communicate expectations
Give directions
Schedule work
Maintain performance standards
Clarify leader’s role
Supportive leadership:
Make work pleasant
Treat group members as equals
Be friendly and approachable
Show concern for subordinates’ well-being
Achievement-oriented leadership:
Set challenging goals
Expect high performance levels
Emphasize continuous improvement
Display confidence in meeting high standards
Participative leadership:
Involve subordinates in decision making
Consult with subordinates
Ask for subordinates’ suggestions
Use subordinates’ suggestions
House Leadership Styles
When to use House’s leadership styles:
Use directive leadership when job assignments are ambiguous
Use supportive leadership when worker self-confidence is low
Use participative leadership when performance incentives are poor
Use achievement-oriented leadership when task challenge is insufficient
Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX)
Not all people are treated the same by leaders in leadership situations
“In groups”
High LMX
“Out groups”
Low LMX
Nature of the exchange is based on presumed characteristics by the leader
High LMX relationship:
favourable personality
Competency
compatibility
Low LMX relationship:
unfavourable personality
low competency
low compatibility
Leader Participation Model
Vroom-Jago leader-participation theory:
Helps leaders choose the method of decision making that best fits the nature of the problem situation
Basic decision-making choices:
Authority decision
Consultative decision
Group decision
Decision Making Options in the Vroom-Jago Leader Participation theory
Decide alone
Consult individually
Consult with group
Facilitate
Delegate
Study Questions 3: What are the contingency Approaches to Leadership
Contingency factors in the Vroom-Jago leader-participation theory:
Decision quality:
Who has the information needed for problem solving?
Decision acceptance:
What is the importance of subordinate acceptance to eventual implementation?
Decision time:
Is there enough time available to make and implement the decision?
According to Vroom-Jago leader-participation theory, a leader should use authority-oriented decision methods when:
The leader has greater expertise to solve a problem
The leader is confident and capable of acting alone
Others are likely to accept and implement the decision
Little or no time is available for discussion
Benefits of participative decision methods:
Help improve decision quality
Help improve decision acceptance
Helps develop leadership potential
Potential disadvantages of participative decision methods:
Lost efficiency
Not particularly useful when problems must be solved immediately
Study Question 4: What are some current issues in Leadership Development
Superleaders:
Persons whose vision and strength of personality have an extraordinary impact on others
Charismatic leaders:
Develop special leader-follower relationships and inspire others in extraordinary ways
Transactional leadership:
Someone who directs the efforts of others through tasks, rewards, and structures
Transformational leadership:
Someone who is truly inspirational as a leader and who arouses others to seek extraordinary performance accomplishments
Characteristics of transformational leaders:
Vision
Charisma
Symbolism
Empowerment
Intellectual Stimulation
Integrity
Emotional Intelligence:
The ability of people to manage themselves and their relationships effectively
Components of emotional intelligence:
Self-awareness
Self-regulation
Motivation
Empathy
Social skill
Gender and Leadership:
Future leadership success will depend on a person’s capacity to:
Be open
Have positive relationships
Be supportive
Be empowering
Gender and Leadership (cont’d):
Both women and men can be effective leaders
Women tend to use interactive leadership, which shares the qualities of transformational leadership
Men tend to use transactional leadership
Interactive leadership provides a good fit with the demands of a diverse workforce and the new workplace
Moral Leadership:
Ethical leadership adheres to moral standards meeting the test of “good” rather than “bad” and “right” rather than “wrong”
All leaders are expected to maintain high ethical standards
Long-term, sustainable success requires ethical behaviour
Integrity involves the leader’s honesty, credibility, and consistency in putting values into action
Leaders with integrity earn the trust of their followers
Leaders have a moral obligation to build performance capacities by awakening people’s potential
Authentic leadership activates performance through the positive psychological states of confidence, hope, optimism, and resilience
Authentic leadership helps in clearly framing and responding to moral dilemmas, and serving as an ethical role model
Drucker’s “Old-fashioned” Leadership:
Leadership is more than charisma; it is “good old-fashioned” hard work
Essentials of “old-fashioned” leadership:
Defining and establishing a sense of mission
Accepting leadership as a “responsibility” rather than a rank
Earning and keeping the trust of others