Exhaustive Notes on Cognitive Development: Piaget and Vygotsky Theories
Course Announcements and Weekly Schedule
Welcome Back: The lecturer has returned and will be teaching for the remainder of the semester.
Presentation Assignment: Starting next week. Students are encouraged to check in regarding feelings about the assignment and use the professor's office hours on Friday if they have questions.
Task Review: The peer review exercise was intended as an informal way to discuss studies and prepare for presentations.
Current Week Overview:
Today: Overarching theories of cognitive development, specifically Piaget and Vygotsky.
Piaget Focus: In-depth review of the Sensory Motor Period, class inclusion, and scientific reasoning.
Vygotsky Focus: Cultural and linguistic impacts on development, the zone of proximal development, and a comparison with Piaget.
Tomorrow: Conceptual development, focusing on how children understand the biological world (biology) and cause and effect (causality).
Assigned Readings:
Sections through in the textbook are particularly important for brushing up on Piaget.
The lecture on biology and causality (tomorrow) is less represented in the assigned textbook chapters.
Defining Cognitive Development
Broader Context: Cognitive development is one branch of developmental study, alongside perceptual, physical, and emotional development.
Core Topics in Cognition:
Thinking processes and problem solving.
Memory and learning.
Metacognition: How children think about their own thinking.
Attention and reasoning.
Self-control and language.
The Developmental Approach:
Analysis: Pulling the mind apart to focus on specific topics like attention or perception.
Synthesis: Thinking about how all these aspects (social, emotional, physical, and cognitive) come together. Cognitive development does not happen in isolation.
Jean Piaget’s Theoretical Perspective
Background: Piaget had a background in biology and was interested in how organisms and knowledge develop. He identified as a "genetic epistemologist."
Central Question: How do humans go from being born with very little knowledge (reflexes) to being capable of complex reasoning (e.g., building rockets, commerce)?
Three Theory Hallmarks:
Constructivist: The child is an active participant, constructing knowledge and abilities through experience, building on basic building blocks like reflexes.
Domain-General: Development reflects learning and reasoning mechanisms used for everything—physical world, language, social world, and numbers.
Stage-Based: Children "level up" through discrete stages, focused on mastering major milestones before moving to the next level.
Mechanisms of Development in Piaget’s Theory
Schemas: A child’s knowledge and ways of interacting with the world.
Example: A "looking schema" where a child learns to maintain fixation on an object despite head weight and weak neck muscles.
Adaptation: The link between schemas and world experiences, involving three processes:
Assimilation: Using existing schemas to make sense of new experiences (e.g., seeing a new animal and classifying it as a "dog").
Accommodation: Updating or creating new schemas when existing ones don't fit (e.g., understanding a cell phone as a "phone" despite it lacking physical buttons found on older models).
Equilibration: The balance between assimilation and accommodation to ensure an adaptive fit.
Piaget’s Stages of Development
Sensory Motor Stage: Focused on self and object knowledge.
Pre-operational Stage: Characterized by failing conservation tasks.
Concrete Operational Stage: Passing concrete conservation tasks (e.g., reasoning about liquid volume in different glass shapes).
Formal Operational Level: The highest level involving abstract, formal, and logical reasoning.
The Six Substages of the Sensorimotor Period ( to Years)
Substage 1: Reflexes ( to Month):
Born with basic reflexes (e.g., palmar grasp reflex).
Children become more efficient at deploying these through learning.
No integration of information across senses (hearing, seeing, and feeling are separate).
Undifferentiated experience: No distinction between self and the external world.
Substage 2: Primary Circular Reactions ( to Months):
Primary: Focused on the infant’s own body.
Circular: Repetitive actions.
Reaction: Initially happening by chance.
Example: A child accidentally touches their hand to their toe, triggers a reflex, and repeats the action to learn about their body.
Substage 3: Secondary Circular Reactions ( to Months):
Secondary: Focused on external objects or entities.
Developing schemas for objects (e.g., a rattle). Child learns how to grasp, look at, mouth, and shake objects.
Substage 4: Coordination of Secondary Circular Reactions ( to Months):
Integrating separate schemas into a coherent representation (e.g., a rattle is something that feels, looks, and sounds a certain way).
Basic problem solving: The child can retrieve a toy from location in the -not- task.
Substage 5: Tertiary Circular Reactions ( to Months):
Tertiary moves from acting on objects to acting on schemas themselves.
Actively exploring and playing with different ways of behaving to see what outcomes they generate.
Example: Interacting with a new cat more gently than a family cat to see the response.
Substage 6: Beginning of Thought ( to Months):
Evidence of insight and early symbolic thinking.
Early language development.
Creative problem solving: For example, pulling a tablecloth to bring an out-of-reach object closer.
Object Permanence through the Sensorimotor Substages
Substage 1: No distinction between self and objects.
Substage 2: Out of sight is out of mind.
Substage 3: Child searches for an object if it is partially occluded.
Substage 4: Searches for fully occluded objects but fails the -not- task (searching at location even after seeing it moved to location ).
Substage 5: Passes the -not- task but fails the invisible displacement task (tracking an object hidden in a cup that is then moved).
Substage 6: Passes the invisible displacement task; possesses an adult-like concept of object permanence.
Class Inclusion and Critiques of Piaget
Class Inclusion Definition: A logical concept where subclasses are included in a whole class; the whole is greater than any one part.
The Task:
"Are there more dogs or cats?" ($ ext{passed by kids aged } ext{ to } ).
"Are there more animals or dogs?" ($ ext{not passed until approx. } ext{ years old}$).
Piaget’s Conclusion: Children have difficulty thinking across two levels of a logical hierarchy simultaneously.
Modern Critiques:
Framing Matters: If the question is changed to "more in the family of frogs" versus "female frogs," children pass earlier.
Social Context: The -not- failure might be due to the child thinking the experimenter is teaching them specifically about location .
Conservation Task Critiques: Using a "naughty teddy" to move pennies (providing a reason for the change) helps children pass the conservation task at a younger age.
Experimenter Demand Effects: Children may change answers because they think the adult wants a different response after performing an action.
Scientific Reasoning in the Formal Operational Stage
The Achievement: Representing the hypothetical-deductive method (forming hypotheses and deducing tests).
The Pendulum Task:
Children must find factors affecting swing speed (string length, weight, release point, force).
Recognition vs. Production Gap: By years of age, children can recognize systematic scientific behavior in others but struggle to produce systematic interventions themselves until much later.
Lev Vygotsky’s Social Constructivism
Perspective: Children are active constructivists but develop within social and cultural contexts. They learn through observation and feedback from more skilled individuals.
Key Focus Areas: Language internalization and cultural tools.
Rejection of Stages: Vygotsky questioned universal stages, arguing that development is messier and depends on cultural needs rather than a fixed biological order.
The Cultural Tools Metaphor
Physical Tools: Cultures build tools for specific needs; these are passed down, refined, and taught to the next generation.
Mental/Cultural Tools: Language, numerical systems, music, art, and meditative practices.
Implications of the Metaphor:
Mental tools are acquired through "guided participation."
Usage of these tools is a skill developed over time through practice (like riding a bike).
Tools vary by culture: Different environments provide different tools for different needs.
Access vs. Use: Just because a mental tool exists doesn't mean a child will always use it (the production-recognition gap).
Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)
Definition: The "sweet spot" for development where a task is challenging but achievable.
Success Rate: Vygotsky estimated this zone occurs when a child has roughly an success rate.
Social Nature: The ZPD changes based on the availability of tools, coaches, and peer support.
Example Case: A student succeeding at a physical task (clapping/jumping) when supported by a coach and cheered on by classmates.
Comparison: Piaget vs. Vygotsky (Figure )
Piaget:
Focus on biology and universal development.
Processes are essentially the same for human and non-human animals.
Mental operators (logical tools) develop internally as the child reaches certain levels.
Vygotsky:
Focus on culture and social context.
Development is non-universal and depends on specific cultural tools.
Mental tools are internalized from the outside (social world) into the inside.
Questions & Discussion
Question: If a baby hears a loud noise that startles them, wouldn't they know the noise caused it?
Response: According to Piaget’s Substage 1, the baby likely wouldn't separate a loud noise from an internal signal like gas in their tummy. It is simply one undifferentiated "ball of experience."
Question: Does Substage (Tertiary Circular Reactions) essentially seek problems to solve, or is it just gaining knowledge about creative approaches?
Response: Substage is focused on actively exploring and playing with schemas. Substage moves toward symbolic thinking and abstraction, though they are a continuous progression.
Question: Why do infants explore so much with their mouths?
Response: Using the mouth is critical for feeding and is evolutionary; it is also a rich way to explore an object's density and texture early in development.