Week 3 - Velocity-Duration, Power-Duration, and Critical Power Concepts

Velocity-Duration and Power-Duration Foundations

  • A. V. Hill established the curvilinear relationship between average velocity and exercise duration across world record events in men's and women's swimming, running, and men's rowing.

  • Kennerly (also cited as Kennelly or McKenley) demonstrated that plotting the natural logarithm of distance against log time produces a linear relationship, highlighting a scale-invariant power law function.

  • Modern data demonstrates a near-perfect fit (R2≈1R^2 \approx 1) for power law functions between 1000 m1000\,m and marathon distances, but the relationship deteriorates at extreme short (60 m60\,m-100 m100\,m) and long (24-hour24\text{-hour} ultramarathon) distances due to physiological discrepancies across intensity domains.

The Critical Power and Critical Speed Framework

  • Wilkie (1985) along with Monod and Scherrer (also referred to as Mono and Shera) defined Critical Power (CPCP) and Critical Speed (CSCS) as the asymptote of the power-duration or velocity-duration curve.

  • Work capacity above CPCP or CSCS is defined by the curvature constant W′W' (work prime, in joules or kJkJ) or D′D' (distance prime, in meters), historically termed anaerobic work capacity.

  • Work performed at or below CPCP/CSCS does not utilize W′W'/D′D', whereas exercise above CPCP/CSCS depletes this fixed energetic reserve until exhaustion occurs.

  • Research by Mark Burnley confirmed that the CPCP/CSCS relationship applies across diverse species (including horses, painted ghost crab, fiddler crab, lungless salamander, and desert iguana under cool vs. warm conditions) and modalities (cycling, isometric knee extension at 14%14\% to 40%40\% of MVC, shuttle running).

Mathematical Modeling and Testing Protocols

  • Multi-Visit Protocols: Uses 33 to 55 laboratory visits for time trials to exhaustion (TlimT_{\text{lim}}) evaluated via three primary mathematical models:

    • Hyperbolic model: Tlim=D′Speed−CST_{\text{lim}} = \frac{D'}{\text{Speed} - CS}.

    • Linear distance-time model: Plotted as distance over time, where the slope represents CSCS and the y-intercept represents D′D'.

    • Linear inverse-time (1t\frac{1}{t}) model: Plotted as speed against 1t\frac{1}{t}, where the slope represents D′D' and the y-intercept represents CSCS.

  • 3-Minute All-Out Test (3-min AOT3\text{-min AOT}):

    • Requires continuous 100%100\% maximal effort for 180 seconds180\,\text{seconds} without pacing to fully deplete W′W'/D′D'.

    • Power output plateaus during the final 30 seconds30\,\text{seconds}, which approximates CPCP

    • Correlates tightly with multi-visit testing, provided athletes receive non-time-based verbal encouragement and complete familiarization to prevent pacing.

    • Field-based testing developed by Kramer and colleagues adapts this protocol using maximal shuttle running.

Metabolic Domains and Physiological Determinants

  • CPCP and CSCS delineate the domain boundary between heavy-intensity and severe-intensity exercise (whereas lactate threshold delineates moderate-intensity from heavy-intensity exercise).

  • Severe Intensity Domain (> ⁣CP>\!CP / > ⁣CS>\!CS):

    • Oxygen uptake (VO2\text{VO}_2) fails to achieve a steady state and increases toward VO2 max\text{VO}_2\text{ max}.

    • Blood lactate continually accumulates without stabilizing.

    • Causes rapid depletion of intramuscular phosphocreatine (PCr\text{PCr}), marked acidosis, and elevated inorganic phosphate.

  • Moderate and Heavy Domains (≤ ⁣CP\le\!CP / ≤ ⁣CS\le\!CS):

    • Achieve a metabolic steady state for VO2\text{VO}_2, blood lactate, and PCr\text{PCr} (with a ∼60%\sim 60\% drop in PCr\text{PCr} during heavy exercise before stabilization).

    • Fatigue during prolonged exercise below CPCP is driven primarily by muscle glycogen depletion rather than high-energy phosphate depletion.

  • CPCP is strongly associated with muscle oxidative capacity, exhibiting strong correlations with the percentage of type 1 muscle fibers (r≈0.7r \approx 0.7) and type 1 fiber capillary contacts.

Applied Uses: Profiling, Prediction, and Intermittent Exercise

  • Athlete Profiling and Performance Prediction:

    • Elite marathoners (such as Eliud Kipchoge / Elliot Kupchogo / Elliot Kimchogue and Antonio Pinto, as studied by Andy Jones and Annie Van Hatland / Anni Van Hartelow) run personal bests at an average mean speed of 96%96\% of their CSCS

    • Mathematical modeling predicts maximal performance capability (TlimT_{\text{lim}}), such as a theoretical maximum of 15 min 13 s15\,\text{min}\,13\,\text{s} (913 seconds913\,\text{seconds}) for a 5000 m5000\,m run.

  • Intermittent Work and W′W' Balance Modeling:

    • W′W'/D′D' acts as a rechargeable energetic store; working above CPCP/CSCS depletes the balance, while working below CPCP/CSCS reconstitutes it.

    • Phil Skiba (or Phils schema) and Christian Vassallo (from Michael Wardroam / Ward-Hopkins group) developed integral and differential W′W' balance models (Wbal′W'_{\text{bal}}) to track energy expenditure in real time during variable-paced sports and protocols like the 30-1530\text{-}15 Intermittent Fitness Test.

    • Depletion rate depends on work interval intensity and duration; recovery rate depends on how far recovery intensity is below CPCP/CSCS and recovery interval duration (e.g., changes observed across 5 s5\,s to 20 s20\,s vs. 30 s30\,s intervals).

  • Training Adaptations:

    • Training responses are better explained by changes in CPCP and W′W' than by changes in VO2 max\text{VO}_2\text{ max}.

    • Endurance training increases CPCP/CSCS but frequently reduces W′W'/D′D'.

    • Resistance and high-intensity strength/power training (Sawyer and colleagues; Geyser and Wilson / Geyzer and Wilson) can enhance W′W'/D′D' without altering CPCP.