The approach is more than a checklist; it is a comprehensive thought process.
Key to the thought process is recognizing that every action is influenced by prior events
Understanding context is essential; nothing occurs in isolation.
The first step is critical; misidentifying problems leads to convoluted conclusions.
Key issues to identify:
What is wrong?
Where is the moral conflict?
Moral conflicts are contextual:
They do not arise from hypotheticals but rather from real-world complexities.
Example: Instead of asking broad questions like "Is war ever right?", narrow it down to specific cases, such as current U.S. conflicts.
Establishing a firm grasp on context is vital:
Identify the societal backdrop (government, families, etc.) surrounding the issues being examined.
Understand what various communities are asking for or need in that context.
Aim to present a well-rounded picture of the moral conflict arising from this environment.
Morality involves determining right and wrong within a community.
The question at hand: How should we act based on shared morals amidst conflict?
Examples of moral questions should provoke thought about ethical decisions within shared values and obligations.
Thesis statements should evolve throughout the writing process.
Often, the real ethical stance only becomes clear post-writing.
Initial thesis drafts may lack depth until the writer develops their arguments fully.
Be cautious about over-relying on thesis statements early on as they can mislead.
Writing is a reflective activity; it helps clarify thoughts.
Engage in non-linear thinking:
Writing out of order can aid clarity.
Focused brainstorming (like using bubbles) helps organize thoughts without feeling overwhelmed.
Students have been exposed to philosophical ethics that enhances their understanding of moral dilemmas in America.
Connection of philosophical principles with real societal issues.
Importance of recognizing multiple perspectives; disagreeing with scholars is valuable and contributes to discussions.
Responsive ethics involve analyzing other viewpoints while incorporating one's voice:
Engage with scholarly works critically.
Identify a scholar whose ideas resonate partially; use their insights to frame arguments while establishing your perspective.
Caution against adopting someone else's ideas as solely your own.
Discussing Christian ethics entails connecting foundational Christian traditions with moral dilemmas.
Assess how Christian scripture and community norms influence ethical decision-making.
Engage with questions like "How do Christian teachings change perspectives on moral issues?"
Aim to merge ethical considerations from secular frameworks with theological insights.
In the accountability section of writing, synthesize findings to suggest three possible actions:
Proposals should be articulated as full sentences, not lists.
Emphasize the humility of offering multiple suggestions rather than presenting definitive answers.
Summarize main findings; clarify the key arguments presented in the previous sections.
Effective conclusion ties back to the introduction reflecting the journey of the discussion.
Initially, it may seem irrelevant until developed fully.
Organize thoughts into actionable steps while writing drafts:
Consider what makes sense for you, write initial thoughts before analyzing others.
Reflect and ensure your voice remains prominent through the process.
Expect to evolve in understanding and conclusions as the writing progresses.
Enhance skills for graduate studies:
Understand the importance of proposing next steps based on informed perspectives.
Use writings from class as a foundation for graduate admission portfolios, emphasizing the relevance of liberal arts education.
Continue cultivating a critical mindset and understanding of structuring arguments.
Every piece of written work contributes to the overarching aim of developing a unique viewpoint in ethics and morality, especially in societal contexts.