Ethics and Values in Pharmacy Part-1
Contact InformationInstructor: Amal M. Badawoud, PharmD, PhD, FHEAOffice Hours: Sunday & Monday: 1:00 pm – 2:50 pm (by email)Office Location: College of Pharmacy, Third floor, Office # 3.322Email: AMBadawoud@pnu.edu.sa
Course OverviewTitle: Ethics and Values in PharmacyInstructor: Amal M. Badawoud, PharmD, PhD, FHEACourse Code: CPP 302Reference: Veatch RM, Haddad AM. Case Studies in Pharmacy Ethics, 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Learning Outcomes
Identify the four fundamental questions of ethics.
Apply problem-solving models to ethical issues in clinical cases.
Analyze necessary clinical and situational information for ethical analysis.
Identify and define relevant ethical principles in clinical contexts.
Evaluate options to determine morally justifiable choices.
Distinguish evaluative judgments in clinical practice.
Differentiate between ethical judgments and other evaluative judgments.
The Four Questions of Ethics
What makes a judgment an ethical one?
Understand the criteria for making ethical judgments; these include the impact on well-being, rights, and justice involved in actions.
Implement steps to clarify ethical problems, such as differentiating between evaluative statements (opinions) and factual ones (objective truths).
Who should make decisions?
Engage stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, and ethical committees to explore who should be involved in decision-making processes regarding patient care.
Determining Right Actions
Explore normative ethics and general principles related to what makes acts right or wrong through two primary theories:
Consequentialism: Right actions are defined by their outcomes; the greatest good for the greatest number of people is the guiding principle.
Deontological Ethics (Duty-Based): Actions are right if they follow established duties or rules, regardless of the consequences. For example, telling the truth is regarded as a moral duty even if it leads to negative consequences.
Applying Rules to Situations
Recognize that general ethical principles must be adapted to unique cases. Understand the functions of rules:
Summarize experiences from prior situations to inform current decisions.
Specify mandatory behaviors to guide protective actions that respect both patient and healthcare provider rights, like in cases of abortion or assisted suicide.
What Should Be Done in Specific Cases?
Analyzing specific situations often requires integrating prior ethical reasoning to arrive at a comprehensive analysis.
Explore complex ethical conflicts, such as balancing abortion rights against healthcare provider rights and how individual beliefs may influence these conflicts.
Decision-making processes must consider elements of patient autonomy, healthcare obligations, and the ethical guidelines governing practice.
Levels of Ethical Analysis
Metaethics: Investigate the source and justification of ethical claims. Assess whether ethical principles originate from societal consensus, legal frameworks, or philosophical doctrines.
Normative Ethics: Focus on identifying principles and values that govern ethical behavior.
Rules and Rights: Structure discussions around ethical frameworks that apply to various contexts.
Specific Cases: Conduct contextual analysis to determine the applicability of ethical principles in real-world scenarios.
Five-Step Model for Ethical Decision-Making
Recognize a moral issue.
Gather necessary information and assess the situation thoroughly to get a clear understanding.
Identify the ethical problem; pinpoint any conflicting ethical principles at play.
Seek potential resolutions that respect all parties involved.
Collaborate with others in choosing a best course of action; consult with colleagues, ethical guidelines, or case studies.
Application of the Five-Step Model (Case Study)
Case: Reporting a Possibly Lethal Error
Context: Two patients are in critical condition, and there is an ethical dilemma regarding a medication dispensing error.
Steps Overview:
Gather clinical and situational information to assess the implications of the error.
Address moral accountability and remain sensitive to the emotional nature of the situation for patients and families.
Examine ethical principles, particularly beneficence (acting in the best interest of patients) and nonmaleficence (an obligation to not inflict harm).
Ethical Principles in Conflict
Veracity: Pharmacists have an obligation to speak truthfully about medication errors to patients and families.
Nonmaleficence: A duty to avoid causing harm must guide interactions and decisions, especially while discussing errors that could affect patient safety.
Fidelity: Commitment to loyalty and trust relates to patients and families should be maintained when discussing ethical decisions and safeguarding their rights.
Decisions should weigh potential benefits against harms carefully to uphold ethical standards.
Distinct Perspectives in Ethical Decision-Making
Case: Over-the-Counter Diet Pills
Engage in evaluative judgments about the risks and benefits associated with recommending weight-loss drugs.
The pharmacist's role encompasses balancing patient education with ethical obligations tied to informed consent, transparency, and advocacy for patient safety.
Conclusion
Ethical decisions in pharmacy demand a nuanced understanding of various principles, models, and the ability to reflect on complex clinical contexts.
Continuous evaluation of ethical conflicts and potential consequences is pivotal to uphold ethical standards and deliver quality patient care in clinical practice.
The 80/20 Rule, also known as the Pareto Principle, states that roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of causes. In various contexts, this principle highlights the importance of focusing on the most impactful elements:
Application in Business: 80% of sales often come from 20% of clients, indicating the need to prioritize relationships with those key clients to maximize revenue.
Time Management: Identifying the 20% of tasks that yield 80% of results helps in prioritizing work and improving productivity.
Education: 20% of study material may cover 80% of information necessary for exams, guiding students to focus their efforts effectively.
Problem Solving: In troubleshooting, concentrating on the 20% of issues that cause 80% of problems can lead to quicker resolutions and greater efficiency.
By applying the 80/20 Rule, individuals and organizations can strategically allocate resources and efforts toward areas that yield the highest returns.