AP World History Summer Assignment – Digitized Historiography
Scales of Historical Writing
History is infinitely “zoom-able.”
One can compress the history of the universe onto a single sheet of paper.
Conversely, the life-cycle of a mayfly (≈24 hours) could be expanded into 40 full volumes.
Key takeaway: the historian chooses the level of magnification and thus shapes both scope and depth.
Implication for students: always ask “What is the scale?” before evaluating any secondary source.
Archimedes’ Polygon Analogy & the Pursuit of
Classical problem: find the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter , i.e. .
Archimedes’ strategy:
Draw a square outside the circle and a square inside it.
These squares provide upper and lower bounds for .
Unable to calculate directly, he inscribed a 99-sided regular polygon (and, implicitly, polygons with ever-increasing side counts).
As the number of sides increases, the perimeter approaches the circumference:
Historiographical analogy:
Polygon sides = historical sources.
Circle = past reality.
More sides / more sources ⇒ tighter approximation of what actually happened.
Multiplicity of Sources & Reduction of Error
A single source (or single photograph) captures only one “angle.”
Adding sources performs the same function as adding polygon sides or taking multiple photos: it closes the gap between representation and reality.
This does not guarantee perfect accuracy, but it minimizes gross selectivity and increases verisimilitude (appearance of truth).
Photographer Simile
Historian ≈ Photographer: both freeze a 3-D, dynamic world into a 2-D, static representation → inherent distortion.
“The historian, like the camera, always lies”: acknowledges inevitable bias and omission.
Counter-measure:
Multiple shots (different angles, lenses, filters, film types) ⇒ better composite picture.
Historically, this translates into cross-checking documents, artifacts, oral testimonies, quantitative data, etc.
Critical Thinking & Analytical Skills for Historians
Essential competencies:
Source criticism: identify authorship, purpose, audience, and bias.
Contextualization: place evidence within economic, social, political, and cultural frameworks.
Synthesis: weave disparate data into a coherent narrative—accepting contradictions where they persist.
Recognition of multifaceted truth: “the truth of many sensitivities.”
Practical habits:
Ask “Whose voice is missing?”
Distinguish primary vs. secondary evidence.
Utilize comparative perspectives across regions, periods, and disciplines.
Limits of Definition; Power of Description
Intellectual definitions often “raise more questions than they answer.”
Norman Davies’ camel analogy:
Trying to define world history is as futile as defining a camel; better to describe its features and behaviors.
Pedagogical implication: emphasize thick description (detailed, context-rich narration) over abstract, one-sentence definitions.
Ethical & Philosophical Implications
Acknowledging omnipresent bias forces historians to act with intellectual humility.
The pursuit of historical truth is asymptotic: one may approach but never fully attain total accuracy, mirroring Archimedes’ limit process.
Responsible historiography requires deliberate transparency about scope, methods, and limitations.
Numerical & Conceptual References Recap
1 page ↔ entire universe’s history.
40 volumes ↔ life-cycle of a mayfly.
99-sided polygon ↔ Archimedes’ approximation of .
as central mathematical analogy.
captures the epistemological ideal: infinite evidence → perfect reconstruction (theoretically).
Study Tip
Create your own “polygon of evidence” for any major AP World DBQ: aim for minimum 6–7 corroborating sources to approximate the fullest picture, recognizing that complete certainty remains elusive.