Plant Biotechnology: Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
Plant Biotechnology: Unit IV - Biotic and Abiotic Stresses of Plants
Introduction to Plant Stresses
Plants face various stresses that impact their growth and development. These stresses are broadly categorized into:
Biotic Stresses: Caused by living organisms.
Abiotic Stresses: Caused by non-living environmental factors.
Biotic Stresses
Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Involve prokaryotes, fungi, and viruses.
Lead to diseases, but plants have natural resistance mechanisms.
Disease resistance can be enhanced through biotechnological approaches, such as over-expression of PR-proteins.
Herbicides also act as biotic stress factors.
Disease Resistance
Most plants are resistant to most pathogens; disease is the exception, not the rule.
The interaction between plants and pathogens drives diversity in defense and pathogenicity genes.
Natural Disease Resistance in Plants
Plants possess pre-existing anatomical defenses like cuticle, bark, and wax.
They also have pre-existing antimicrobial proteins and phytoanticipins.
Biotechnological Approaches
Over-expression of PR-proteins.
Transgenic approaches for improving tolerance to herbicides.
Plant-based detoxification mechanisms.
Pathogens and Disease
Plant pathogens are infectious agents that cause disease in plants, resulting in significant yield losses (10-30% annually).
Up to 25% of plant genes respond to pathogen infection.
Examples of organisms causing plant diseases include bacteria, oomycetes, and fungi.
Germ Theory and Koch's Postulates
Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch established the germ theory, demonstrating that animal diseases are caused by microbes.
Koch’s postulates to establish a microbe as the causal agent of a disease (1880s):
The microbe is always associated and isolated from the patient with the disease.
The microbe must be grown in pure culture.
The microbe can be injected or inoculated into an animal (plant) and cause disease.
The microbe can be re-isolated in pure culture.
Disease Triangle
Disease development depends on the interaction between host, pathogen, and environment.
The pathogen must overcome plant defenses.
The environment must favor the pathogen.
The host plant must be susceptible.
Human Influence on Diseases
Monoculture, introduced pathogens and vectors, and growing practices contribute to disease spread.
Strategies of Pathogenicity
A successful pathogen must find and attach to the host, gain entry, avoid defenses, grow, reproduce, and spread.
Pathogen Arrival and Attachment
Wind, water, insects, and chemotaxis help pathogens reach their hosts.
Some pathogens use extracellular polysaccharides or hydrophobin proteins to attach to the plant surface.
Penetration and Circumvention of Physical Barriers
Pathogens penetrate through stomata or directly puncture the cell wall using appressoria.
Some pathogens produce melanized appressoria to build up high pressure and puncture the cell wall.
Pathogen Lifestyle: Biotrophs, Necrotrophs, and Hemibiotrophs
Biotrophs: Live within host tissue without causing cell death.
Necrotrophs: Kill cells and consume their contents.
Hemibiotrophs: Switch between biotroph and necrotroph lifestyles.
Biotroph Interactions
Fungal and oomycete biotrophs make haustoria for nutrient and signal exchange.
Haustoria remain outside the plant plasma membrane.
Plant Defense Mechanisms
Plants employ anatomical defenses (cuticle, bark, wax).
They have pre-existing antimicrobial proteins and phytoanticipins.
Inducible systems are triggered by elicitors, effectors, or cell wall fragments.
Systemic responses include systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR).
Plant Immune Responses
Plants resist pathogens through recognition and defense responses.
Pathogen recognition involves:
MAMPs/PAMPs (Microbe/Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns)
Effectors.
Plant recognition involves:
Pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs)
Resistance (R) proteins.
Effector targets/susceptibility factors.
Zig-Zag Model of Plant-Pathogen Interactions
Describes the dynamic interplay between plant immunity and pathogen virulence.
Pattern Triggered Immunity (PTI): triggered when the Pathogen is recognized.
Effector Triggered Immunity (ETI): triggered when the Effector is recognized.
Effector Triggered Susceptibility: Pathogen effectors suppress defense response.
Plant Defense Responses
Include increased synthesis of stress hormones, up-regulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, synthesis of antimicrobial compounds (phytoalexins), production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and production of callose.
Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRRs)
Recognize conserved microbial elements via extracellular leucine-rich repeat domains and initiate defense responses through intracellular kinase domains.
Plants also respond to their own cellular damage through DAMPs (Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns).
PAMPs and PRRs
PRRs recognize PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns).
Examples include:
FLS2 recognizing flagellin.
CERK1 recognizing chitin.
Pattern Triggered Immunity (PTI)
Activated by PAMP/PRR interactions.
Involves kinase cascades and calcium ion influx triggering transcriptional responses.
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Immune Signaling
PAMP binding triggers phosphorylation of BIK1, activating NADPH oxidase RBOHD and producing ROS.
Phytoalexins and Phytoanticipins
Antimicrobial compounds that ward off pathogens; can be preformed (phytoanticipins) or induced (phytoalexins).
Defense Responses: Callose, ROS, and Phytoalexins
Callose acts as a barrier to pathogen attack.
ROS and phytoalexins are toxic to pathogens.
Pathogen Effectors
Enhance virulence by suppressing plant immune responses or contributing to pathogen viability.
Effector Action
Act outside the pathogen, in the plant cell, or in the apoplast.
Delivered via Type-III secretion systems (T3SS) in bacteria or secreted from haustoria/hyphae in fungi and oomycetes.
Resistance (R) Proteins
Intracellular immune receptors that recognize effectors.
Activation leads to enhanced defense responses.
R Protein Classes
Include NB-LRRs, Receptor-Like Proteins (RLPs), and Receptor-Like Kinases (RLKs).
R Protein Recognition of Effectors
Can bind directly, recognize effector complexes, or recognize effector-modified host proteins.
Effector Triggered Immunity (ETI)
Faster, stronger, and more prolonged than PTI.
Involves production of salicylic acid (SA), ROS, hypersensitive cell death response (HR), and expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins.
Hypersensitive Response (HR)
Induced by R protein activation, leading to cell death at the site of infection.
ROS is generated in the apoplast, chloroplasts, and mitochondria.
Pathogenesis-Related (PR) Proteins
Includes B-1,3-glucanases, chitinases, and thaumatin-like proteins.
Known families are listed using gene symbols ypr1, ypr2, etc.
Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR)
Uninfected tissues show enhanced resistance to subsequent pathogen challenge.
Mobile signals mediate this systemic response.
Summary of Plant Immunity
PTI is suppressed by effectors, which can trigger ETI.
R proteins recognize effectors and induce ETI.
Plant Responses to Necrotrophic Pathogens
Few known R genes confer resistance to necrotrophs, making breeding for resistance more challenging.
Salicylate and Jasmonate Antagonism
Salicylates are associated with biotroph defense, while jasmonates are associated with necrotroph defense.
Strategies to Prevent and Manage Disease
Avoid or eliminate the pathogen.
Manipulate the environment to favor the plant.
Make the plant resistant through genetic or other methods.
Prevention
Agricultural inspectors check imported plants for pests and pathogens.
Cultural practices, such as maintaining healthy soil, can protect plants.
Chemical Controls
Fungicides are used to eradicate pathogens.
Biocontrol Agents
Attack or compete with pathogens.
Enhance plant defenses through induced systemic resistance (ISR).
Genetic Approaches to Disease Resistance
Introgression of R genes.
Quantitative disease resistance breeding.
Biotechnological approaches to improve pathogen recognition, increase defense signaling, interfere with pathogen virulence, and prime defense responses.
Classical Approaches: R Genes and Quantitative Disease Resistance
R gene introgression can confer complete resistance.
Quantitative disease loci (QDL) promote partial disease resistance.
Exploiting R Proteins and PRRs
Stacking/pyramiding R genes in one cultivar.
Growing multiple transgenic lines, each with a different R gene.
Biotechnological Approaches: Candidate Genes for Resistance
Introducing pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to improve pathogen recognition.
Biotech Approaches to Enhancing Immunity
Introduce or modify PRRs.
Overexpress or modify signaling intermediates.
Detoxify or sequester effectors.
Use biological controls or chemical induction of priming.
Effector Manipulation of Host Susceptibility Factors
Pathogens like Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) secrete TAL effectors that manipulate host gene expression.
CRISPR-Cas9 editing can be used to mutate effector binding elements (EBEs) in susceptibility genes, resulting in resistance.
Host-Induced Gene Silencing (HIGS)
Transgenic plants expressing shRNA can silence pathogen genes, preventing multiplication and pathogenicity.
Viral Disease Control
Control the vector.
Use chemical controls.
Produce virus-free plant stocks.
Introgression R genes.
Cross protection (inoculation with a mild virus strain).
Herbs as Biotic Stress Factors
Herbicides are used to control weeds and can be classified by their mode of action.
Herbicide Tolerance
Transgenic approaches are used to improve tolerance.
Plant-based detoxification mechanisms are utilized.
Commercial Success of Herbicide Tolerance
Traits include herbicide tolerance and insect resistance.
Herbicide tolerance can be achieved through various mechanisms, including:
Agrobacterium CP4-resistant gene.
Maize resistant gene.
Oxidoreductase detoxification.
Acetylation detoxification.
Mutant plant acetolactate synthase.
Reasons for Herbicide Tolerance Success
Pre-existing knowledge about herbicide mode of action.
Availability of herbicide-resistant microorganisms and tolerant plants.
Strategies to Obtain Herbicide Tolerance
Overexpression of the target enzyme.
Mutation of the target enzyme.
Detoxification of the herbicide.
Enhanced plant detoxification.
Glyphosate (Roundup) Tolerance
Glyphosate inhibits EPSP synthase, disrupting aromatic amino acid biosynthesis.
Strategies for Glyphosate Tolerance
Overexpress wildtype EPSP synthase.
Overexpress mutated EPSP synthase.
Introduce glyphosate detoxification enzymes.
Liberty Link® / Glufosinate
Glufosinate inhibits glutamine synthase, leading to ammonia buildup.
Resistance is achieved through the bar or pat genes from Streptomyces, which break down glufosinate.
Abiotic Stresses
Nature and Plant Responses
Water deficit stress
Salt stress
Cold and heat stress
Abiotic Stress Definition
The combined effect of suboptimal abiotic environmental conditions on plant performance, reducing yield.
Abiotic stress tolerance is the ability to withstand these conditions better than the average plant.
Main Abiotic Stresses
Drought: Caused by low or irregular rainfall.
Salt: Occurs in coastal and irrigated regions.
Cold: Includes chilling and freezing.
Mineral Imbalance: Involves macro- and micro-element deficiencies or excesses.
Abiotic Stress Response in Plants
Involves C-repeat (CRT)-binding factor/dehydration-responsive element (DRE) binding protein 1 (CBF/ DREB1) transcription factors and ABA-responsive elements (ABREs).
Abiotic Stress and Tolerance Mechanisms
Drought Tolerance
Drought escape: Short life cycle and growth in moist places.
Drought avoidance: Reducing water loss and increasing water supply.
Drought tolerance: Adapting metabolism to water loss.
Osmoprotectants/Osmolytes
Maintain a water shell around macromolecules.
Compatible solutes do not disturb the water shell.
Desiccation Tolerance
Some plants and tissues are desiccation-tolerant, including seeds, pollen, bryophytes, and some vascular plants.
Cellular Responses to Desiccation
Prevent irreversible damage by stabilizing membranes and proteins.
LEA Proteins
Intrinsically-disordered proteins that accumulate during dehydration and protect cell structures.
Cell Wall Structure and Desiccation Tolerance
Orderly folding helps membranes and walls survive desiccation.
Antioxidant Systems
Induced by dehydration stress to detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS).
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
Superoxide, hydroxyl radical, and hydrogen peroxide.
Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants
Detoxify ROS and can be up-regulated under water stress conditions.
Plant Response to Water Deficit
All plants respond to mild water deficit, while desiccation-tolerant plants take it further.
Perception of Water Deficit
May occur at the cell membrane through pressure sensors.
Water Deficit Signaling
Involves ABA, ethylene, hydraulic signals, and transcriptional cascades.
Abscisic Acid (ABA)
Accumulation is a rapid response to water deficit.
Levels are tightly controlled by synthesis, conjugation, and degradation.
Transcriptional Responses to Water Deficit
Well-characterized, involving thousands of genes regulated by ABA and other factors.
Water-Optimized, Drought-Tolerant Agricultural Plants
New technologies enable prevention, diagnosis, and elimination of water deficit effects.
Breeding Programs
Depend on high-throughput phenomics tools.
Yield Under Drought Stress
The product of water uptake (WU), water use efficiency (WUE), and harvest index (conversion of biomass to grain).
Genetic Engineering Strategies
Prevent stress by growing large root systems, preventing entry of toxic minerals, or attracting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.
Reduce the natural stress response.
Detoxify ROS.
Modify stress signaling response.
Target Genes for Genetic Engineering
Enzymes for producing protecting metabolites.
Transporters.
Chaperones.
Signaling proteins.
Transcription factors.
Breeding for Drought Tolerance: Candidate Gene Approach
Involves genes related to transport proteins, transcription factors, osmotic adjustment, protective proteins, and signaling molecules.
Regulatory Controls on Genetically-Engineered Plants
Plants made using genetic engineering face additional regulatory hurdles.
Promising Genes for Drought Tolerance
Transcription factors, membrane transporters, and hormone synthesis genes.
The Cold Response and Signal Transduction
Cold exposure causes various physiochemical disturbances, leading to growth inhibition. Cold stress response involves signal transduction that activates transcription factors and cold-responsive genes for tolerance.
The Cold Response and Transcription
During cold stress, various transcription factors, including C-repeat binding factors, are involved in activating cold-responsive genes.
DREB1/2 regulation of drought/cold/salt stress.
The salt stress and Plant responses: SOS Pathway for Salinity Tolerance
Salt stress leads to an increase in Ca^{2+}, which activates SOS3. SOS3 activates SOS2. SOS2 activates SOS1 via phosphorylation.
Plant responses to heat stress
Heat stress in plants leads to ROS production, increased membrane fluidity, protein denaturation, and activation of chaperonin. These components are vital for heat stress tolerance.