Primary Focus:
Governance structures in nonprofit organizations (NPOs).
Accountability mechanisms for stakeholders.
Strategic management practices tailored for nonprofits.
Agenda:
Governance and Accountability.
Stakeholders and Multiple Bottom Lines.
Nonprofit Strategizing and Strategic Management.
Governance refers to the rules and procedures for decision-making in organizational affairs and mechanisms for ensuring compliance and implementation.
Special Features for Nonprofits:
Aligning governance with the organization’s mission and ensuring performance matches goals.
Distinct from management, as governance focuses on steering, oversight, and fiduciary responsibility.
Fiduciary Responsibility:
Safeguard the organization’s financial health and resources.
Strategic Oversight:
Ensure alignment between mission and activities.
Independence and Leadership:
Avoid conflicts of interest and promote independent decision-making.
Board Types:
Elected Boards: Members are voted in, ensuring democratic representation.
Self-Perpetuating Boards: Current members select new members, maintaining continuity.
Hybrid Boards: Combination of elected and self-perpetuating members.
CEO and Board Dynamics:
CEOs implement policies set by the board. While boards provide oversight, the CEO handles daily management, ensuring operational efficiency.
Agency Theory:
Explains the relationship between boards (principals) and management (agents). Boards ensure agents work in the best interests of the organization.
Stewardship Theory:
Views managers and boards as stewards committed to achieving the organization’s mission, reducing conflicts of interest.
Stakeholder Theory:
Emphasizes accountability to all stakeholders (e.g., donors, beneficiaries).
Resource Dependency Theory:
Boards manage relationships with external funders, ensuring resource flows.
Institutional Theory:
Organizations adapt their governance practices to align with societal norms and regulatory expectations.
Performance Accountability:
Measures the fit between activities and the organization’s mission.
Involves audits, budgets, and program oversight.
Legal and Fiscal Accountability:
Ensures compliance with laws and regulations, such as labor laws or environmental standards.
Public Accountability:
Engaging the public through transparency, such as publishing annual reports or financial disclosures.
Responsive Accountability:
Adapting practices to address stakeholder needs.
Upward: To funders, regulators, and supporters.
Downward: To beneficiaries, clients, and members.
External: To the broader public, media, and partner organizations.
Internal: To staff, volunteers, and the mission.
Definition: Accessibility to information about the organization’s activities, finances, and governance.
Caution: More transparency isn’t always better—it must be balanced with operational efficiency.
Stakeholders are individuals or organizations impacted by or having expectations of the NPO.
Types:
Internal: Board members, staff, volunteers.
External: Beneficiaries, funders, government agencies, community groups.
Unlike businesses focused on profit, NPOs manage:
Economic Bottom Line: Financial sustainability.
Ecological Bottom Line: Environmental impact.
Social Bottom Line: Community well-being and social change.
Steps:
Identify stakeholders.
Determine their interests, needs, and power.
Map their influence and prioritize engagement strategies.
Strategic management ensures the organization’s long-term vision, direction, and program performance align with its mission.
Vision and Mission Development:
A vision articulates the NPO’s future aspirations.
A mission specifies its purpose and scope.
Strategic Positioning:
Analyze internal resources and external operating environments.
Example: SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis.
Objective Setting:
Develop actionable goals linked to the mission.
Use the Theory of Change (ToC) to map activities to long-term impact.
Approaches:
Rational: Linear and goal-focused.
Incremental: Evolving strategies based on small adjustments.
Participatory: Involves stakeholders in decision-making.
Experimental: Encourages innovation and learning.
Problems in NPO Evaluation:
Plurality: Diverse goals make it hard to measure success.
Causality: Linking activities to outcomes is challenging.
Measurement: Lack of quantifiable metrics for social impact.
Developed by Kendall and Knapp (2000) to measure NPO performance.
Elements:
Inputs: Staff, volunteers, resources.
Outputs: Immediate deliverables.
Outcomes: Long-term changes linked to the mission.
Efficiency and Equity: Balancing cost-effectiveness with fairness.
SWOT Analysis.
PEST Analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological factors).
Stakeholder Analysis.
Balanced Scorecard for multidimensional performance tracking.
Mission Drift:
Balancing resource dependence with mission alignment.
Complex Accountability:
Navigating upward, downward, internal, and external demands.
Scaling Impact:
Expanding programs while maintaining quality and consistency.
Governance in nonprofits emphasizes alignment between mission and activities while maintaining accountability to diverse stakeholders.
Nonprofits must manage multiple bottom lines—social, economic, and ecological—requiring innovative management practices.
Strategic management in NPOs must balance rational planning with participatory and experimental approaches.
Performance evaluation tools like the POW framework help measure the effectiveness of nonprofit activities, though challenges in measuring social impact persist.