The Paradox of Standardized Testing
Introduction to the Paradox of Standardized Testing
Author: Joshua P. Starr
Source: The Phi Delta Kappan, November 2017
Publication: Phi Delta Kappa International
Stable URL: JSTOR
Publication Context: Scholarly discussion regarding the implications of standardized testing in public education.
The Flaws and Uses of Standardized Testing
Flaws of Standardized Achievement Tests:
Deeply flawed in design and outcomes.
Test-based accountability has significantly harmed the public education system.
Personal Reflections on Standardized Testing:
Author's experience as both a parent and a superintendent highlights a personal conflict about the value of test scores.
Despite understanding the limitations of standardized tests, he feels relieved when his children perform well relative to others.
Impact of Standardized Testing on School Leadership
Dual Perspectives on Test Results:
As a superintendent, balancing acknowledgment of the flaws with the necessity of analyzing results to guide improvements.
Acknowledges the narrow focus enforced by mandates such as No Child Left Behind.
Potential Benefits of Standardized Testing:
First Benefit: Encourages schools to learn how to leverage data effectively for educational improvements.
Second Benefit: Demonstrates inequities in education, identifying how well schools serve marginalized groups (e.g., black, Hispanic, low-income students, and English language learners).
Historical Context and Philosophical Reflections
Historical Background:
Reference to the Progressive Era and Raymond Callahan’s concept of the "cult of efficiency" concerning educational administration.
Administrators sought to standardize multiple educational processes under the guise of objectivity, inadvertently perpetuating racial biases.
Philosophical Dilemma for Education Leaders:
Education leaders must grapple with the problematic legacy of standardized tests while seeking to implement change.
Recognition that understanding and embracing contradictions within the educational system is essential for progress.
Standardized Testing as a Reality in Education
Public Perception and Testing Necessity:
Current reality: Standardized testing is expected and accepted by parents, who demand more comprehensive educational experiences from schools (e.g., arts, career-related classes).
Utilizing Test Results for Further Assessment:
Encouragement to view test scores as a starting point for deeper analysis rather than an end goal.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and Data Use
Opportunities Under ESSA:
ESSA allows states and districts to explore data collection beyond traditional assessments.
Focus on complementary indicators such as social-emotional learning and career readiness as meaningful aspects of education.
Importance of Surveys:
Student and staff surveys can provide insights into school climate, such as engagement and bullying, which are correlated with academic performance.
Evaluating School Performance
Questions for Improvement:
What actions should be taken if a high-performing school has a negative emotional climate?
How to evaluate a school that has improved test scores but not essential career skills?
Conclusion and Practical Considerations
Current Stance on Testing:
Acknowledges the harm done by prior test-focused policies while recognizing the need for standardized testing's existence.
Emphasizes the potential for using test data constructively to enhance educational systems, promoting radical pragmatism in addressing existing frameworks.
References
Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the Cult of Efficiency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mehta, J. (2015). The Allure of Order: High Hopes, Dashed Expectations, and the Troubled Quest to Remake American Schooling. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rose, T. (2016). The End of Average: How We Succeed in a World That Values Sameness. New York, NY: Harper Collins.