Standardisation and Codification of the English Language
Historical Context and the Development of English
English is described as a "vacuum cleaner" of a language because of its extensive history of interaction with other cultures and languages. Its development has been influenced by:
The Romans.
The Danes and the Vikings.
The French.
The Renaissance, which introduced elements of Latin, Greek, and Hebrew into the linguistic background.
Codification and Regulation
Codification refers to the process of establishing rules for a language to make it consistent. One satirical observation regarding the logic of English is that if the language made sense, a "catastrophe" would be an "apostrophe with fur."
Jonathan Swift: An Anglo-Irish author and prose satirist who, in , argued that the English language was in a state of chaos.
Swift proposed the creation of an academy to regulate English.
He viewed contractions as "inelegant" and believed they corrupted the language. Examples he cited included:
Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary ()
Published in , this work was the primary reference for English for years until the publication of the Oxford English Dictionary.
Composition Details:
It contained entries.
It took Johnson years to write.
He was assisted by helpers.
Characteristics:
The dictionary preserved many spellings used in modern English.
The definitions were noted for being succinct and consistent.
It was descriptive in nature; Johnson stated his aim was to "not form but register the language."
Criticisms: The work was later criticized for being highly selective. Half of the entries were derived from only seven sources: Shakespeare, Dryden, Milton, Addison, Bacon, Pope, and the Bible.
Idiosyncratic Definitions:
Lexicographer: "A writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words."
Excise: "A hateful tax levied upon commodities, and adjudged not by the common judges of property, but wretches hired by those to whom excise is paid."
Oats: "A grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people."
Standardisation and Standard English
Standardisation involves the acceptance of a specific form of English as the norm against which other varieties are compared.
Kate Burridge’s View: A non-standard dialect is just as valid a communication system as the standard.
David Crystal’s Definition of Standard English:
It has no local base; there are no features in its syntax or lexis that link it to a specific geographical area.
It is defined by grammar, vocabulary, and spelling rather than pronunciation.
It is the variety with the most prestige, associated with the powerful.
It is used by public institutions including Universities, schools, government, and the media.
It is the most widely understood variety; more people can understand Standard English than can speak or write it.
Sara Thorne’s Perspective:
Standard English provides a unified means of communication for a country, cutting across regional differences.
It is frequently called "BBC English" or "The Queen’s English."
It is associated with the law, education, the church, and the financial world.
It is the form taught to second-language learners, which perpetuates its cultural value.
Received Pronunciation (RP)
Received Pronunciation (RP) is the standard form of pronunciation associated with Standard English.
Current Usage: Today, only 2-3 \text{%} of the British population speak RP in its original form.
Modified Received Pronunciation (MRP): This is a more common form used by educated speakers who mix RP characteristics with regional forms.
Social judgements regarding accents have become less dogmatic; RP is no longer a prerequisite for social status. Politicians, academics, and media presenters often retain modified regional accents.
Linguistic Attitudes: Prescriptivism and Descriptivism
Language exists on a continuum of attitudes regarding its change and evolution.
Prescriptivism:
Prescriptivists are focused on the "rules" of language.
They believe these rules should be applied strictly, regardless of context, participant relationships, mode, or codification.
Descriptivism:
Descriptivists are concerned with how language is actually used without passing judgment.
They use the terms "standard" and "non-standard" as descriptors rather than labeling usage as "right" or "wrong."
Language variation is viewed as dependent on context, relationships, purpose, and specific dialects (e.g., Australian English, Aboriginal Australian English, Ethnolects, or Youthspeak).
Morphological Changes
Morphology is the study of the internal structure of words. New words are formed through several processes:
Shortenings: Reducing existing words (e.g., ).
Compounding: Combining two or more free morphemes (e.g., ).
Affixing: Adding bound morphemes to words.
Prefixes:
Suffixes:
Infixes: Inserting a morpheme into the middle of a word (e.g., in "un-bloody-likely").
Blends: Merging two original words (e.g., ).
Acronyms: Words formed from initials and pronounced as a single word (e.g., ).
Initialisms: Words formed from initials where each letter is pronounced (e.g., ).
Backformation: Subtracting a part of a word (often a perceived affix) to create a new word.
Example: "To bludge" created from "bludger" by dropping the .
Other examples: from , from , from , from , from , from , from .
Conversion: A word changes from one word class to another without adding an affix.
Example: "Market" used as a noun ("going to the market") versus a verb ("market this product") beginning in the century.
Lexical Changes
Lexicology is the study of words within a specific language. New words enter the lexicon through:
Borrowings: Anglicized words from other languages (e.g., from Latin , from Swedish, from Japanese).
Commonisation: Names (brands, places, persons) becoming common nouns.
Examples: (from Blundstones), .
Archaisms: Outdated or old-fashioned language (e.g., ).
Neologisms: New words that have recently been accepted into the language.
Can involve shifts between domains (e.g., moving from radio to internet) or innovations (e.g., for cask wine).
Obsolescence: If the referent of a word ceases to exist, the word may be removed from the language.
Examples: (a small sword) and (torso armor).
Semantic Changes
Semantics is the study of meaning. Words change meaning over time through several processes:
Broadening: The meaning expands to include more contexts.
Example: broadened from meaning a shrub to meaning "the woods."
Example: shifted from a religious "holy day" to any day off.
Narrowing: The meaning becomes more specific and moves to fewer contexts.
Example: meant "to die" in Old English, then "to die of cold" in Middle English, and finally "to die of hunger" in the century.
Example: once meant any food but now refers only to animal flesh.
Shift: The word comes to mean something entirely different.
Example: shifted from "merry" to "homosexual."
Example: is now frequently used to mean "figuratively."
Elevation (Amelioration): A word develops more favorable or positive connotations.
Example: meaning "very good."
Example: used as an intensifier meaning "very."
Example: in Aboriginal English.
Deterioration (Pejoration): A word acquires negative connotations.
Example: shifted from meaning "skilful" to "deceptive/selfish."
Semantic Comparison Table
Word | Previous Meaning | Modern Meaning | Process |
|---|---|---|---|
Bludger | A pimp (living off a prostitute's earnings) | A scrounger (living off others' efforts) | Shift/Deterioration |
Moody | Brave | Miserable or grumpy | Shift/Deterioration |
Witch | A male or female sorcerer | A female with magical powers | Narrowing |
Write | To scratch | To mark letters on a surface | Shift |
Grumble | Murmur or low sounds | To complain | Shift/Deterioration |
Sly | Skilful | Deceptive | Deterioration |
Hussy | Housewife | An immoral girl or woman | Deterioration |
Dag | A lock of dung-matted wool on a sheep | An unfashionable person | Shift/Deterioration |
Politician | Shrewd, nasty schemer | A person involved in politics | Elevation |
The Great Vowel Shift
The Great Vowel Shift represents a major change in the pronunciation of the English language that occurred between the Middle English and Early Modern English periods.
This shift has significantly affected English spelling, often resulting in discrepancies between how words are spelled and how they are currently pronounced.
Questions & Discussion
Question: What is Standard English?
Answer: A variety of English accepted as the norm, characterized by lack of a regional base, institutional usage, and high prestige.
Question: Which dialect 'almost' became a base for Standard English and why did it not succeed?
Answer: London English became the basis because of its association with the capital, the court, and centers of commerce/learning. Scribes in these areas influenced the standard, though variation persisted before full codification.
Question: Why might scribes of texts add an 'extra e'?
Answer: Often to justify the margins of the text or as a result of inconsistent spelling practices prior to full standardisation.
Question: What do we mean by codified?
Answer: The process of organizing and recording the rules and vocabulary of a language in a systematic way (e.g., through dictionaries and grammar books).
Question: Many disagreed with words such as ‘belly-timber’ in Johnson's dictionary. What linguistic term describes such attitudes?
Answer: Prescriptivism.