Organizational Governance, Structures, Life Cycles, and Processes

Project Governance and Organizational Influences

  • Project Governance Framework:

    • Provides the overarching framework, functions, and processes to guide project management activities toward strategic target objectives.

    • Establishes a single point of accountability across the entire project life cycle.

    • Calibration is essential: excessive governance causes stakeholder friction, whereas insufficient governance reduces engagement and accountability.

  • Escalation Thresholds and Tolerances:

    • Threshold: A predetermined value of a measurable variable that marks a boundary requiring mandatory action.

    • Tolerance: The quantified acceptable variation for project parameters including quality, risk, schedule, and budget.

    • Variances within thresholds are managed directly by the project team; variances exceeding tolerances escalate to designated governance stakeholders.

  • Environmental Influences:

    • Enterprise Environmental Factors (EEFs): Internal and external conditions outside the immediate control of the team that influence, constrain, or direct the project.

    • Organizational Process Assets (OPAs): Internal organizational artifacts including processes, policies, procedures, documentation templates, and corporate knowledge bases.

Organizational Structures

  • Functional Organization:

    • Organized hierarchically around functional departments under specialized managers.

    • Functional managers control project decisions and resources; the project manager has little to no formal authority.

  • Projectized Organization:

    • Organized exclusively around projects where team members report directly to the project manager.

    • The project manager holds high to complete authority over assignments, budgets, and operational decisions.

  • Matrix Organization:

    • Blends functional and projectized structures, sharing authority between project managers and functional managers.

    • Weak Matrix: Functional managers retain primary decision-making; project managers act largely as coordinators with low authority.

    • Balanced Matrix: Authority and budget ownership are shared; project managers operate in a full-time role.

    • Strong Matrix: Project managers possess moderate-to-high authority and direct ownership of the project budget.

Project Characteristics and Project Home Across Organizational Structures

Project Roles and the PMO

  • Governance Tiers and Key Roles:

    • Executive Level: Steering Team provides strategic guidance, project selection, and prioritization; Project Sponsor funds the project and chairs the steering committee; Chief Projects Officer/PMO directs enterprise alignment.

    • Managerial Level: Project Managers direct team workflows and integration; Functional Managers manage line resources and departmental personnel.

    • Associate Level: Core Team Members execute project deliverables from inception to close; Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) provide technical specialty guidance.

  • Project Management Office (PMO) Types:

    • Supportive: Provides templates, best practices, methodology guidelines, and training.

    • Controlling: Enforces adherence to project standards, policies, and procedures through audits.

    • Directive: Assumes direct control by managing project execution and shared resource pools.

    • Agile Centers of Excellence: Builds enterprise agile capabilities, coaching teams, sponsors, and product owners.

Project Life Cycles and Development Approaches

  • Life Cycle and Phase Structure:

    • Project Life Cycle: The series of phases spanning project start to finish.

    • Phase Relationships: Can be Sequential (one phase executes after another without overlap) or Overlapping (phases execute concurrently to compress schedules).

    • Phase Gates: Formal governance checkpoints (also termed tollgates or kill points) where deliverables are reviewed to authorize phase continuation, adjustment, or termination.

  • Development Approaches:

    • Predictive (Waterfall): Plan-driven approach where scope, budget, and schedule are defined upfront; deliverables are completed and handed over at the conclusion of the life cycle.

    • Adaptive (Agile): Iterative and incremental approach where requirements evolve through timeboxed iterations with continuous feedback cycles.

    • Hybrid: Tailored approach combining predictive control with adaptive development flexibility.

Development Approaches Continuum

Project Dynamics and Process Groups

  • Effort, Risk, and Cost Curves:

    • Project completion over time frequently follows a stretched-S curve (slow start, rapid momentum, slow finish).

    • Overall resource effort peaks during planning, execution, and monitoring activities.

    • Stakeholder influence, risk, and uncertainty are at their peak early and decrease as work progresses.

    • The cost of implementing changes starts low and rises dramatically toward project completion.

Variables and Project Time Showing Risk Versus Cost of Changes
  • Five Project Management Process Groups:

    • Initiating: Defines and authorizes a new project or phase.

    • Planning: Establishes project scope, refines objectives, and plans courses of action.

    • Executing: Completes the activities defined in the project management plan.

    • Monitoring & Controlling: Tracks, reviews, and regulates project execution to ensure alignment with targets.

    • Closing: Formally completes or terminates a project, phase, or contractual obligation.

    • Process groups operate concurrently and interact continuously across phases rather than functioning as isolated chronological blocks.

Overlap of Process Groups in One Phase