CHAPTER 14: Mathematical Induction Study Guide

The Concept of Mathematical Induction

  • Mathematical induction is a powerful proof technique used to prove an infinite list of statements, typically indexed by natural numbers.

  • Motivation and Conjecture: Consider the conjecture that the sum of the first nn odd natural numbers equals n2n^2.     * For n=1n = 1: 1=121 = 1^2     * For n=2n = 2: 1+3=4=221 + 3 = 4 = 2^2     * For n=3n = 3: 1+3+5=9=321 + 3 + 5 = 9 = 3^2     * For n=4n = 4: 1+3+5+7=16=421 + 3 + 5 + 7 = 16 = 4^2     * For n=5n = 5: 1+3+5+7+9=25=521 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25 = 5^2

  • General Formula: The sum is represented as 1+3+5+7+9+11++(2n1)=n21 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + \cdots + (2n - 1) = n^2.

  • The nth Odd Number: The tables indicate that the nthn^{th} odd natural number (the last term in the sum) is defined by the formula 2n12n - 1.     * Example: When n=2n = 2, the second odd number is 2×21=32 \times 2 - 1 = 3.     * Example: When n=3n = 3, the third odd number is 2×31=52 \times 3 - 1 = 5.

  • The Domino Analogy: To visualize induction, imagine statements S1,S2,S3,S_1, S_2, S_3, \dots as a row of dominoes.     1. If the first domino S1S_1 is knocked down (proved true).     2. If the falling of any domino SkS_k (assuming it is true) necessarily causes the next domino Sk+1S_{k+1} to fall (proving the implication).     3. Conclusion: All dominoes in the sequence will fall (all statements are true).

Outline and Mechanism of Proof by Induction

  • Formal Outline for Proof by Induction:     * Proposition: The statements S1,S2,S3,S4,S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4, \dots are all true.     * Proof Procedure:         1. Basis Step: Prove that the first statement S1S_1 is true. (Note: The index can start at values other than 11, such as 00 or any integer mm).         2. Inductive Step: Given any integer k1k \ge 1, prove that the implication SkSk+1S_k \Rightarrow S_{k+1} is true.         3. Conclusion: By mathematical induction, every SnS_n is true.

  • Inductive Hypothesis: The assumption in the inductive step that SkS_k is true is specifically called the inductive hypothesis.

  • Direct Proof in Induction: Step (2) is usually carried out using a direct proof: assume SkS_k is true and demonstrate that this forces Sk+1S_{k+1} to be true.

  • Inductive Reasoning vs. Mathematical Induction:     * Inductive Reasoning: Reaching a conclusion based on prior observations; the conclusion is "likely" but not certain.     * Mathematical Induction: A rigorous mathematical method that provides absolute certainty for an infinite set of cases.

Examples of Proof by Induction

  • Example 1: Sum of First n Odd Numbers     * Proposition: If nNn \in \mathbb{N}, then 1+3+5+7++(2n1)=n21 + 3 + 5 + 7 + \cdots + (2n - 1) = n^2.     * Basis Step: For n=1n = 1, 1=121 = 1^2 is true.     * Inductive Step: Suppose 1+3+5+7++(2k1)=k21 + 3 + 5 + 7 + \cdots + (2k - 1) = k^2. We examine the sum for k+1k+1:         * 1+3+5++(2k1)+(2(k+1)1)1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + (2k - 1) + (2(k + 1) - 1)         * =(1+3+5++(2k1))+(2k+1)= (1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + (2k - 1)) + (2k + 1)         * =k2+2k+1= k^2 + 2k + 1 (using the inductive hypothesis)         * =(k+1)2= (k + 1)^2.     * Thus, the proposition holds for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

  • Example 2: Divisibility     * Proposition: If nn is a non-negative integer, then 5(n5n)5 | (n^5 - n).     * Basis Step: For n=0n = 0, 5(050)5 | (0^5 - 0) which is 505 | 0, true.     * Inductive Step: Suppose 5(k5k)5 | (k^5 - k), meaning k5k=5ak^5 - k = 5a for some integer aa.         * (k+1)5(k+1)=k5+5k4+10k3+10k2+5k+1k1(k + 1)^5 - (k + 1) = k^5 + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k + 1 - k - 1         * =(k5k)+5k4+10k3+10k2+5k= (k^5 - k) + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k         * =5a+5k4+10k3+10k2+5k=5(a+k4+2k3+2k2+k)= 5a + 5k^4 + 10k^3 + 10k^2 + 5k = 5(a + k^4 + 2k^3 + 2k^2 + k).     * Since this is a multiple of 55, the statement holds.

  • Example 3: Summation with Factorials     * Proposition: If nZn \in \mathbb{Z} and n0n \ge 0, then i=0nii!=(n+1)!1\sum_{i=0}^{n} i \cdot i! = (n + 1)! - 1.     * Basis Step: For n=0n = 0, 00!=00 \cdot 0! = 0 and (0+1)!1=11=0(0 + 1)! - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0. True.     * Inductive Step: Assume i=0kii!=(k+1)!1\sum_{i=0}^{k} i \cdot i! = (k + 1)! - 1.         * i=0k+1ii!=(i=0kii!)+(k+1)(k+1)!\sum_{i=0}^{k+1} i \cdot i! = \left(\sum_{i=0}^{k} i \cdot i!\right) + (k + 1)(k + 1)!         * =(k+1)!1+(k+1)(k+1)!= (k + 1)! - 1 + (k + 1)(k + 1)!         * =(k+1)!(1+k+1)1=(k+1)!(k+2)1=(k+2)!1= (k + 1)!(1 + k + 1) - 1 = (k + 1)!(k + 2) - 1 = (k + 2)! - 1. True.

  • Example 4: Inequalities and Inequality Addition     * Logic Rule: If xyx \le y and aba \le b, then x+ay+bx + a \le y + b. Also, if xyx \le y and bb is positive, then xy+bx \le y + b.     * Proposition: 2n2n+12n112^n \le 2^{n+1} - 2^{n-1} - 1 for each nNn \in \mathbb{N}.     * Basis Step: For n=1n = 1, 21222012411=22^1 \le 2^2 - 2^0 - 1 \Rightarrow 2 \le 4 - 1 - 1 = 2. True.     * Inductive Step: Suppose 2k2k+12k112^k \le 2^{k+1} - 2^{k-1} - 1.         * Multiply by 22: 2k+12k+22k22^{k+1} \le 2^{k+2} - 2^k - 2.         * Add 11 to the larger side: 2k+12k+22k12^{k+1} \le 2^{k+2} - 2^k - 1.         * This equals 2(k+1)+12(k+1)112^{(k+1)+1} - 2^{(k+1)-1} - 1. True.

  • Example 5: Bernoulli’s Inequality     * Proposition: If nNn \in \mathbb{N}, then (1+x)n1+nx(1+x)^n \ge 1+nx for all xRx \in \mathbb{R} with x > -1.     * Basis Step: For n=1n = 1, (1+x)1=1+x(1+x)^1 = 1+x, true.     * Inductive Step: Assume (1+x)k1+kx(1+x)^k \ge 1 + kx. Since x > -1, (1+x) > 0.         * (1+x)k(1+x)(1+kx)(1+x)(1+x)^k(1+x) \ge (1+kx)(1+x)         * (1+x)k+11+x+kx+kx2=1+(k+1)x+kx2(1+x)^{k+1} \ge 1 + x + kx + kx^2 = 1 + (k+1)x + kx^2         * Since kx20kx^2 \ge 0, removing it preserves the inequality: (1+x)k+11+(k+1)x(1+x)^{k+1} \ge 1 + (k+1)x.

  • Example 6: Prime Divisibility of a Product (Proposition 14.1)     * Proposition: Let a1,a2,,ana_1, a_2, \dots, a_n be nn integers (n2n \ge 2). If pp is prime and p(a1a2a3an)p | (a_1 a_2 a_3 \cdots a_n), then paip | a_i for at least one ii.     * Basis Step (n=2n = 2): Suppose pa1a2p | a_1 a_2. If pp does not divide a1a_1, then gcd(p,a1)=1gcd(p, a_1) = 1. By identity, 1=pk+a1l1 = pk + a_1 l. Multiplying by a2a_2 gives a2=pka2+a1a2la_2 = pka_2 + a_1 a_2 l. Since pp divides both terms on the right, pa2p | a_2.     * Inductive Step: Assume the property holds for kk integers. For k+1k+1 integers: p(a1ak)ak+1p | (a_1 \cdots a_k) a_{k+1}. By the basis case, p(a1ak)p | (a_1 \cdots a_k) or pak+1p | a_{k+1}. If p(a1ak)p | (a_1 \cdots a_k), the inductive hypothesis ensures pp divides one of a1,,aka_1, \dots, a_k.

Induction in Recursive Procedures

  • Recursion Definition: A procedure is recursive if there is a call to the procedure within its own body.

  • RFac Procedure Example: Procedure RFac(n) 1 begin 2 if n = 0 then 3 return 1 4 else 5 return n * RFac(n - 1) 6 end 7 end     

  • Proposition: For a non-negative integer nn, RFac(n) returns n!n!.

  • Proof by Induction:     1. Basis Step: For n=0n = 0, the code returns 11 (line 3), which is 0!0!. True.     2. Inductive Step: Assume RFac(k) returns k!k!.         * For RFac(k+1), since k+10k+1 \ne 0, the code executes line 5: returns (k+1)×RFac(k)(k+1) \times RFac(k).         * By hypothesis, this is (k+1)×k!=(k+1)!(k+1) \times k! = (k+1)!.     3. Conclusion: RFac(n) correctly calculates n!n! for all non-negative nn.

Proof by Strong Induction

  • Motivation: Regular induction assumes only SkS_k to prove Sk+1S_{k+1}. Strong induction is used when Sk alone does not easily imply Sk+1S_{k+1}. Instead, you may need information from multiple preceding steps.

  • Mechanism: Assume that all statements from the first up to index kk (S1,S2,,SkS_1, S_2, \dots, S_k) are true, then show this forces Sk+1S_{k+1} to be true.

  • Outline for Strong Induction:     1. Basis Step: Prove the first statement S1S_1 (or first several, if necessary).     2. Inductive Step: Given k1k \ge 1, prove (S1S2S3Sk)Sk+1(S_1 \wedge S_2 \wedge S_3 \wedge \cdots \wedge S_k) \Rightarrow S_{k+1}.

  • Example 1: Postage Problem     * Proposition: Any postage of 8 cents8 \text{ cents} or more can be achieved using only 3¢ and 5¢ stamps.     * Basis Case:         * 8¢=3¢+5¢8¢ = 3¢ + 5¢         * 9¢=3¢+3¢+3¢9¢ = 3¢ + 3¢ + 3¢         * 10¢=5¢+5¢10¢ = 5¢ + 5¢     * Inductive Step: Assume statements S8,,SkS_8, \dots, S_k are all true for k10k \ge 10. To prove Sk+1S_{k+1}, consider Sk2S_{k-2}. By hypothesis, k28k-2 \ge 8 is true. We can get (k2)¢(k-2)¢ postage. Adding one 3¢ stamp yields (k2)+3=k+1(k-2) + 3 = k+1 cents.

  • Example 2: Divisibility by 12     * Proposition: If nNn \in \mathbb{N}, then 12(n4n2)12 | (n^4 - n^2).     * Issue with Regular Induction: Expansion results in 12a+4k3+6k2+6k12a + 4k^3 + 6k^2 + 6k, where 1212 cannot be easily factored out.     * Strong Induction Strategy: Use Sk5Sk+1S_{k-5} \Rightarrow S_{k+1}.     * Basis Step: Verify for n=1,2,3,4,5,6n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.         * 1412=01^4 - 1^2 = 0; 2422=122^4 - 2^2 = 12; 3432=723^4 - 3^2 = 72; 4442=2404^4 - 4^2 = 240; 5452=6005^4 - 5^2 = 600; 6462=12606^4 - 6^2 = 1260. All are multiples of 1212.     * Inductive Step: For k6k \ge 6, let k5=lk-5 = l. If SlS_l is true, then l4l2=12al^4 - l^2 = 12a. For k+1=l+6k+1 = l+6:         * (l+6)4(l+6)2=l4+24l3+216l2+864l+1296(l2+12l+36)(l+6)^4 - (l+6)^2 = l^4 + 24l^3 + 216l^2 + 864l + 1296 - (l^2 + 12l + 36)         * =(l4l2)+24l3+216l2+852l+1260= (l^4 - l^2) + 24l^3 + 216l^2 + 852l + 1260         * =12a+24l3+216l2+852l+1260=12(a+2l3+18l2+71l+105)= 12a + 24l^3 + 216l^2 + 852l + 1260 = 12(a + 2l^3 + 18l^2 + 71l + 105). True.

  • Example 3: Graph Theory and Trees     * Definitions:         * Graph: A configuration of points (vertices) and lines (edges).         * Cycle: A sequence of distinct edges forming a route that ends where it began.         * Tree: A connected graph with no cycles.     * Proposition: If a tree has nn vertices, then it has n1n-1 edges.     * Proof: Strong induction is required because removing an edge from a tree with k+1k+1 vertices creates two trees, T1T_1 (with xx vertices) and T2T_2 (with yy vertices), where x, y < k+1.     * Inductive Hypothesis: Trees with mm vertices (1mk1 \le m \le k) have m1m-1 edges.     * Total Edges for k+1 vertices: (Edges in T1T_1) + (Edges in T2T_2) + (the removed edge ee)         * =(x1)+(y1)+1=(x+y)1=(k+1)1=k= (x - 1) + (y - 1) + 1 = (x + y) - 1 = (k+1) - 1 = k.

Proof by Smallest Counterexample

  • Definition: A hybrid of induction and proof by contradiction.

  • Outline:     1. Verify the basis step S1S_1.     2. Assume for contradiction that not every SnS_n is true.     3. Define k > 1 as the smallest integer for which SkS_k is false.     4. This implies Sk1S_{k-1} is true. Use the truth of Sk1S_{k-1} and the falsity of SkS_k to derive a contradiction.

  • Example: Divisibility     * Proposition: If nNn \in \mathbb{N}, then 4(5n1)4 | (5^n - 1).     * Basis Step: 4(511)444 | (5^1 - 1) \Rightarrow 4 | 4. True.     * Contradiction Setup: Let kk be the smallest integer such that 44 does not divide 5k15^k - 1.     * Logic: Then 4(5k11)4 | (5^{k-1} - 1), so 5k11=4a5^{k-1} - 1 = 4a.         * Multiply by 55: 5k5=20a5^k - 5 = 20a         * 5k1=20a+4=4(5a+1)5^k - 1 = 20a + 4 = 4(5a + 1).     * This shows 4(5k1)4 | (5^k - 1), contradicting the assumption that SkS_k was false.

The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

  • Theorem: Any integer n > 1 has a unique prime factorization.

  • Existence Proof (Strong Induction):     * Basis: n=2n = 2 is prime.     * Inductive Step: For n+1n+1, if prime, done. If composite, n+1=abn+1 = ab where a, b < n+1. Since a,ba, b have prime factorizations (by hypothesis), their product is the factorization for n+1n+1.

  • Uniqueness Proof (Smallest Counterexample):     * Assume there is a smallest integer nn with two different factorizations: n=p1p2pk=a1a2aln = p_1 p_2 \cdots p_k = a_1 a_2 \cdots a_l.     * p1np1(a1a2al)p_1 | n \Rightarrow p_1 | (a_1 a_2 \cdots a_l). By Proposition 14.1, p1p_1 must equal one of the aia_i (say a1a_1).     * Divide both sides by p1p_1: the remaining product is a smaller number with two different factorizations, contradicting that nn was the smallest.

Fibonacci Numbers and Identities

  • Leonardo Pisano (Fibonacci): Born around 11751175, Italy. Known for Liber Abaci, promoting Hindu-Arabic numbers.

  • The Fibonacci Sequence: 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377,1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, \dots

  • Recursive Rules: F1=1,F2=1,Fn=Fn1+Fn2F_1 = 1, F_2 = 1, F_n = F_{n-1} + F_{n-2}.

  • Fibonacci Identity Proposition: Fn+12Fn+1FnFn2=(1)nF_{n+1}^2 - F_{n+1} F_n - F_n^2 = (-1)^n.     * Example for n=5: F62F6F5F52=82(8×5)52=644025=1=(1)5F_6^2 - F_6 F_5 - F_5^2 = 8^2 - (8 \times 5) - 5^2 = 64 - 40 - 25 = -1 = (-1)^5.     * Proof by Induction:         1. Basis: (n=1)(n=1) F22F2F1F12=12(1×1)12=1=(1)1F_2^2 - F_2 F_1 - F_1^2 = 1^2 - (1 \times 1) - 1^2 = -1 = (-1)^1.         2. Inductive Step: Assume true for kk. For k+1k+1, use Fk+2=Fk+1+FkF_{k+2} = F_{k+1} + F_k:             * Fk+22Fk+2Fk+1Fk+12F_{k+2}^2 - F_{k+2} F_{k+1} - F_{k+1}^2             * =(Fk+1+Fk)2(Fk+1+Fk)Fk+1Fk+12= (F_{k+1} + F_k)^2 - (F_{k+1} + F_k) F_{k+1} - F_{k+1}^2             * =Fk+12+2Fk+1Fk+Fk2Fk+12FkFk+1Fk+12= F_{k+1}^2 + 2 F_{k+1} F_k + F_k^2 - F_{k+1}^2 - F_k F_{k+1} - F_{k+1}^2             * =Fk+12+Fk+1Fk+Fk2=(Fk+12Fk+1FkFk2)= -F_{k+1}^2 + F_{k+1} F_k + F_k^2 = -(F_{k+1}^2 - F_{k+1} F_k - F_k^2)             * =(1)k=(1)k+1= -(-1)^k = (-1)^{k+1}.

  • Convergence to the Golden Ratio (\Phi):     * The ratio Fn+1Fn\frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n} satisfies the polynomial x2x1=0x^2 - x - 1 = 0 as nn \to \infty.     * The roots are 1±52\frac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2}. The positive root is Φ=1+521.618033\Phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} \approx 1.618033.     * Example: F13F121.618025\frac{F_{13}}{F_{12}} \approx 1.618025.     * Relationship: Fibonacci numbers behave like a geometric sequence with ratio Φ\Phi the further the sequence progresses.

Mathematical Induction Exercises

  1. Sum of integers: 1+2+3++n=n(n+1)21 + 2 + 3 + \cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}.

  2. Sum of squares: 12+22++n2=n(n+1)(2n+1)61^2 + 2^2 + \cdots + n^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}.

  3. Sum of cubes: 13+23++n3=n2(n+1)241^3 + 2^3 + \cdots + n^3 = \frac{n^2(n+1)^2}{4}.

  4. Product sum: 12+23++n(n+1)=n(n+1)(n+2)31 \cdot 2 + 2 \cdot 3 + \cdots + n(n+1) = \frac{n(n+1)(n+2)}{3}.

  5. Geometric sum: 21+22++2n=2n+122^1 + 2^2 + \cdots + 2^n = 2^{n+1} - 2.

  6. Factorial fractions: 12!+23!++n(n+1)!=11(n+1)!\frac{1}{2!} + \frac{2}{3!} + \cdots + \frac{n}{(n+1)!} = 1 - \frac{1}{(n+1)!}.

  7. Divisibility: Prove 24(52n1)24 | (5^{2n} - 1) for n0n \ge 0.

  8. Generalized De Morgan’s Laws: ( \overline{A_1 \cup A_2 \cup \dots \cup A_n} = \overline{A_1} \cap \overline{A_2} \cap \dots \cap \overline{A_n} ).

  9. Harmonic Series divergence: 1+12++12n1+n21 + \frac{1}{2} + \dots + \frac{1}{2^n} \ge 1 + \frac{n}{2}.

  10. Binet’s Formula: Prove Fn=(1+52)n(152)n5F_n = \frac{(\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2})^n - (\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2})^n}{\sqrt{5}}.

  11. Plane Division: nn straight lines (no two parallel, no three intersecting at a point) divide the plane into n2+n+22\frac{n^2+n+2}{2} regions.