CHAPTER 14: Mathematical Induction Study Guide
The Concept of Mathematical Induction
Mathematical induction is a powerful proof technique used to prove an infinite list of statements, typically indexed by natural numbers.
Motivation and Conjecture: Consider the conjecture that the sum of the first odd natural numbers equals . * For : * For : * For : * For : * For :
General Formula: The sum is represented as .
The nth Odd Number: The tables indicate that the odd natural number (the last term in the sum) is defined by the formula . * Example: When , the second odd number is . * Example: When , the third odd number is .
The Domino Analogy: To visualize induction, imagine statements as a row of dominoes. 1. If the first domino is knocked down (proved true). 2. If the falling of any domino (assuming it is true) necessarily causes the next domino to fall (proving the implication). 3. Conclusion: All dominoes in the sequence will fall (all statements are true).
Outline and Mechanism of Proof by Induction
Formal Outline for Proof by Induction: * Proposition: The statements are all true. * Proof Procedure: 1. Basis Step: Prove that the first statement is true. (Note: The index can start at values other than , such as or any integer ). 2. Inductive Step: Given any integer , prove that the implication is true. 3. Conclusion: By mathematical induction, every is true.
Inductive Hypothesis: The assumption in the inductive step that is true is specifically called the inductive hypothesis.
Direct Proof in Induction: Step (2) is usually carried out using a direct proof: assume is true and demonstrate that this forces to be true.
Inductive Reasoning vs. Mathematical Induction: * Inductive Reasoning: Reaching a conclusion based on prior observations; the conclusion is "likely" but not certain. * Mathematical Induction: A rigorous mathematical method that provides absolute certainty for an infinite set of cases.
Examples of Proof by Induction
Example 1: Sum of First n Odd Numbers * Proposition: If , then . * Basis Step: For , is true. * Inductive Step: Suppose . We examine the sum for : * * * (using the inductive hypothesis) * . * Thus, the proposition holds for all .
Example 2: Divisibility * Proposition: If is a non-negative integer, then . * Basis Step: For , which is , true. * Inductive Step: Suppose , meaning for some integer . * * * . * Since this is a multiple of , the statement holds.
Example 3: Summation with Factorials * Proposition: If and , then . * Basis Step: For , and . True. * Inductive Step: Assume . * * * . True.
Example 4: Inequalities and Inequality Addition * Logic Rule: If and , then . Also, if and is positive, then . * Proposition: for each . * Basis Step: For , . True. * Inductive Step: Suppose . * Multiply by : . * Add to the larger side: . * This equals . True.
Example 5: Bernoulli’s Inequality * Proposition: If , then for all with x > -1. * Basis Step: For , , true. * Inductive Step: Assume . Since x > -1, (1+x) > 0. * * * Since , removing it preserves the inequality: .
Example 6: Prime Divisibility of a Product (Proposition 14.1) * Proposition: Let be integers (). If is prime and , then for at least one . * Basis Step (): Suppose . If does not divide , then . By identity, . Multiplying by gives . Since divides both terms on the right, . * Inductive Step: Assume the property holds for integers. For integers: . By the basis case, or . If , the inductive hypothesis ensures divides one of .
Induction in Recursive Procedures
Recursion Definition: A procedure is recursive if there is a call to the procedure within its own body.
RFac Procedure Example:
Procedure RFac(n) 1 begin 2 if n = 0 then 3 return 1 4 else 5 return n * RFac(n - 1) 6 end 7 end Proposition: For a non-negative integer ,
RFac(n)returns .Proof by Induction: 1. Basis Step: For , the code returns (line 3), which is . True. 2. Inductive Step: Assume
RFac(k)returns . * ForRFac(k+1), since , the code executes line 5: returns . * By hypothesis, this is . 3. Conclusion:RFac(n)correctly calculates for all non-negative .
Proof by Strong Induction
Motivation: Regular induction assumes only to prove . Strong induction is used when Sk alone does not easily imply . Instead, you may need information from multiple preceding steps.
Mechanism: Assume that all statements from the first up to index () are true, then show this forces to be true.
Outline for Strong Induction: 1. Basis Step: Prove the first statement (or first several, if necessary). 2. Inductive Step: Given , prove .
Example 1: Postage Problem * Proposition: Any postage of or more can be achieved using only and stamps. * Basis Case: * * * * Inductive Step: Assume statements are all true for . To prove , consider . By hypothesis, is true. We can get postage. Adding one stamp yields cents.
Example 2: Divisibility by 12 * Proposition: If , then . * Issue with Regular Induction: Expansion results in , where cannot be easily factored out. * Strong Induction Strategy: Use . * Basis Step: Verify for . * ; ; ; ; ; . All are multiples of . * Inductive Step: For , let . If is true, then . For : * * * . True.
Example 3: Graph Theory and Trees * Definitions: * Graph: A configuration of points (vertices) and lines (edges). * Cycle: A sequence of distinct edges forming a route that ends where it began. * Tree: A connected graph with no cycles. * Proposition: If a tree has vertices, then it has edges. * Proof: Strong induction is required because removing an edge from a tree with vertices creates two trees, (with vertices) and (with vertices), where x, y < k+1. * Inductive Hypothesis: Trees with vertices () have edges. * Total Edges for k+1 vertices: (Edges in ) + (Edges in ) + (the removed edge ) * .
Proof by Smallest Counterexample
Definition: A hybrid of induction and proof by contradiction.
Outline: 1. Verify the basis step . 2. Assume for contradiction that not every is true. 3. Define k > 1 as the smallest integer for which is false. 4. This implies is true. Use the truth of and the falsity of to derive a contradiction.
Example: Divisibility * Proposition: If , then . * Basis Step: . True. * Contradiction Setup: Let be the smallest integer such that does not divide . * Logic: Then , so . * Multiply by : * . * This shows , contradicting the assumption that was false.
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
Theorem: Any integer n > 1 has a unique prime factorization.
Existence Proof (Strong Induction): * Basis: is prime. * Inductive Step: For , if prime, done. If composite, where a, b < n+1. Since have prime factorizations (by hypothesis), their product is the factorization for .
Uniqueness Proof (Smallest Counterexample): * Assume there is a smallest integer with two different factorizations: . * . By Proposition 14.1, must equal one of the (say ). * Divide both sides by : the remaining product is a smaller number with two different factorizations, contradicting that was the smallest.
Fibonacci Numbers and Identities
Leonardo Pisano (Fibonacci): Born around , Italy. Known for Liber Abaci, promoting Hindu-Arabic numbers.
The Fibonacci Sequence:
Recursive Rules: .
Fibonacci Identity Proposition: . * Example for n=5: . * Proof by Induction: 1. Basis: . 2. Inductive Step: Assume true for . For , use : * * * * * .
Convergence to the Golden Ratio (\Phi): * The ratio satisfies the polynomial as . * The roots are . The positive root is . * Example: . * Relationship: Fibonacci numbers behave like a geometric sequence with ratio the further the sequence progresses.
Mathematical Induction Exercises
Sum of integers: .
Sum of squares: .
Sum of cubes: .
Product sum: .
Geometric sum: .
Factorial fractions: .
Divisibility: Prove for .
Generalized De Morgan’s Laws: ( \overline{A_1 \cup A_2 \cup \dots \cup A_n} = \overline{A_1} \cap \overline{A_2} \cap \dots \cap \overline{A_n} ).
Harmonic Series divergence: .
Binet’s Formula: Prove .
Plane Division: straight lines (no two parallel, no three intersecting at a point) divide the plane into regions.