Module 4: Capacity Planning

Foundations of Operations Management - Module 4: Capacity Planning

What is Capacity?

  • Capacity is defined as the ability to hold, receive, absorb, process, or transform resources within a system.
  • There are two types of measures for capacity:
    • Output measures: Units or resources exiting a process or system.
    • Input measures: Units or resources that enter the process or system.

Measures of Capacity

  • Capacity measures must be tailored to specific situations. Examples include:
    • Restaurant: Number of meals produced in a day.
    • Amusement Park: Number of customers who visit in a day.
    • Delivery Company: Number of packages delivered per hour.
    • Customer Service Center: Calls answered per hour.
    • Auto Manufacturer: Number of vehicles built in a day.
  • Note: Capacities are always measured using a unit of measure over some time interval.

If Capacity Does Not Equal Demand

  • Issues arise when capacity does not meet demand:
    • Identifies potential operational problems that could result from insufficient capacity.
    • Determine measures for improvement in operations to meet demand effectively.

Capacity Planning Concepts

  • Peak Capacity:
    • Maximum rate that a process or system can achieve in the short term under ideal conditions.
  • Effective Capacity:
    • Sustainable output over a prolonged period under normal circumstances.
  • Utilization:
    • The proportion of time a resource is utilized based on total available time.
  • Productivity:
    • The ratio of outputs to inputs indicating the efficiency of resource use.
  • Yield:
    • Usable output derived from input resources.

Differences Between Peak and Effective Capacity

  • The difference between peak and effective capacity often arises due to several assumptions:
    • Availability of equally skilled workers working at full productivity.
    • Assumption of 100% yield rates, with no defects in production.
    • Absence of time loss due to product changeovers or variations in products.
    • No operational interruptions caused by equipment failures or workforce issues.
    • Proper scheduling without unexpected maintenance or planned downtime.
    • Lack of variability in orders or resource availability.

Economies of Scale

  • Economies of Scale:
    • Reduction in average unit cost achieved by spreading fixed costs over a larger volume of production.
  • Diseconomies of Scale:
    • Increase in average cost per unit that occurs when production volume rises beyond optimal capacity.

Capacity Cushion

  • Capacity Cushion defines the difference between maximum capacity utilization (100%) and actual utilization.
    • Formula:
      Capacity Cushion=100%−Utilization Rate (%)\text{Capacity Cushion} = 100\% - \text{Utilization Rate (\%)}
  • Factors determining necessary capacity cushion:
    • Customer expectations.
    • Variability in demand and supply.
    • Cost implications of lost business versus idle capacity.
    • Characteristics of process attributes and linkages.
    • Competitive priorities in the market.

Capacity Strategies

  • Refers to various aspects of capacity management including:
    • Timing for expansion or contraction of capacity.
    • Measurement of capacity cushion size.
    • Facility sizing considerations.
    • Aligning capacity with marketing and business strategies.
    • Meeting competitive priorities.
Wait-and-See Strategy
  • Involves delaying decisions on expansions or resource acquisition until after demand surpasses current capacity.
  • Advantages:
    • Mitigates large capital investments until necessary.
  • Disadvantages:
    • May lead to low or no cushion, risking lost sales and potentially compromising overall responsiveness and product quality.
  • Best applicable in slow-growth industries where unused capacity is costly.
Aggressive Expansion Strategy
  • Involves increasing capacity ahead of projected demand, leading to short-term excess.
  • Advantages:
    • Can achieve economies of scale.
    • Offers higher service and volume flexibility.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Risk of having higher installed capacity than actual demand.
    • Potential for technological obsolescence if not managed.
  • This strategy is most effective in expanding markets where gaining market share is critical due to first-mover advantages.

Improving Capacity

  • Strategies for enhancing capacity within existing constraints:
    • Increase Utilization: Focus on maximizing up-time and reducing changeover/setup times.
    • Improve Efficiency: Optimize processes and layouts that minimize bottlenecks and variations.
    • Increase Yield: Incorporate customer feedback mechanisms (Voice of the Customer), implement Poka-Yoke systems to prevent errors, and improve material quality.

Estimating Capacity Requirements

  • Formula for calculating capacity requirements: M=Σ[Dp+(DQ)s]N[1−(C100)]M = \Sigma [D_p + (\frac{D}{Q})s] N [1 - (\frac{C}{100})] Where:
    • MM: Number of resources required for necessary capacity.
    • DD: Annual demand forecast.
    • pp: Processing time per unit.
    • QQ: Lot or batch size.
    • ss: Set-up time per lot.
    • NN: Total operational hours per year.
    • CC: Desired capacity cushion percentage.

Bottleneck Analysis

  • Definition: A Bottleneck is a step in a process with the slowest cycle time that limits overall system productivity.
  • Objective of process design: Maximize output relative to input.
Bottleneck Identification and Analysis Example
  • Consider a claims processing scenario with four claim types (A, B, C, D) that differ in volume and profitability, processed through multiple workflows with significant material expenses and labor.
    • To analyze:
    1. Identify the bottleneck process by determining capacity versus demand.
    2. Evaluate which claim is the most profitable in terms of processing times and revenues.
    3. Utilize a bottleneck-based approach to optimize product mix based on profitability during constrained resources.
Profitability Calculation Under Different Strategies
  1. Traditional Method:
    • Determine mix based on highest overall profit margins and available capacity for each product type.
  2. Bottleneck-based Approach:
    • Calculate the profit margin per minute for each type and prioritize production based on bottleneck utilization.